Skip to main content

Image Cytometry: Nuclear and Chromosomal DNA Quantification

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB,volume 689)

Abstract

Image cytometry (ICM) associates microscopy, digital image and software technologies, and has been particularly useful in spatial and densitometric cytological analyses, such as DNA ploidy and DNA content measurements. Basically, ICM integrates methodologies of optical microscopy calibration, standard density filters, digital CCD camera, and image analysis softwares for quantitative applications. Apart from all system calibration and setup, cytological protocols must provide good slide preparations for efficient and reliable ICM analysis. In this chapter, procedures for ICM applications employed in our laboratory are described. Protocols shown here for human DNA ploidy determination and quantification of nuclear and chromosomal DNA content in plants could be used as described, or adapted for other studies.

Key words

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
EUR   44.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   85.59
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   147.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Vilhar, B., Greilhuber, J., Koce, J. D., Temsch, E. M., Dermastia, M. (2001) Plant genome size measurement with DNA image cytometry. Ann Bot Fenn 87, 719–728.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chieco, P., Jonker, A., Van Noorden, C. J. F. (2001) Image Cytometry. Microscopy Handbooks 46. Springer, New York, NY, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pektas, Z. O., Keskin, A., Ömer, G., Karslioğlu, Y. (2006) Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64, 628–635.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biesterfeld, S., Reus, K., Bayer-Pietsch, E., Mihalcea, A. M., Böcking, A. (2001) DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 93, 160–164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Böcking, A., Nguyen, V. Q. H. (2003) Diagnostic and prognostic use of DNA image cytometry in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 102, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grote, H. J., Nguyen, H. V. Q., Leick, A. G., Böcking, A. (2004) Identification of progressive cervical epithelial cell abnormalities using DNA image cytometry. Cancer Cytopathol 102, 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greilhuber, J., Ebert, I. (1994) Genome size variation in Pisum sativum. Genome 37, 646–655.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Greilhuber, J., Obermayer, R. (1997) Genome size and maturity group in Glycine max (soybean). Heredity 78, 547–551.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Baranyi, M., Greilhuber, J. (1999) Genome size in Allium: in quest of reproducible data. Ann Bot Fenn 83, 687–695.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Gregory, T. R. (2001) The bigger the C-value, the larger the cell: genome size and red blood cell size in vertebrates. Blood Cell Mol Dis 27, 830–843.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory, T. R. (2003) Genome size estimates for two important freshwater molluscs, the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and the schistosomiasis vector snail (Biomphalaria glabrata). Genome 46, 841–844.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Russ, J. C., Russ, J. C. (ed.) (2008) Introduction to Image Processing and Analysis. CRC Press – Taylor & Francis Group, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 355.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greilhuber, J. (2008) Cytochemistry and C-values: the less-well-known world of nuclear DNA amounts. Ann Bot Fenn 101, 791–804.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodenacker, K., Bengtsson, E. (2003) A feature set for cytometry on digitized microscopic images. Anal Cell Pathol 25, 1–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bollmann, R., Méhes, G., Torka, R., Speich, N., Schmitt, C., Bollmann, M. (2003) Human papillomavirus typing and DNA ploidy determination of squamous intraepithelial lesions in liquid-based cytologic samples. Cancer Cytopathol 99, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Motherby, H., Pomjanski, N., Kube, M., Boros, A., Heiden, T., Tribukait, B., Böcking, A. (2002) Diagnostic DNA-flow vs. image-cytometry in effusion cytology. Anal Cell Pathol 24, 5–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gockel, I., Kämmerer, P., Brieger, J., Heinrich, U. R., Mann, W. J., Bittinger, F., Eckardt, V. F., Junginger, T. (2006) Image cytometric DNA analysis of mucosal biopsies in patients with primary achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 12, 3020–3025.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Temsch, E. M., Greilhuber, J., Krisai, R. (1998) Genome size in Sphagnum (Peat Moss). Bot Acta 111, 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rosado, T. B., Carvalho, C. R, Saraiva, L. S. (2005) DNA content of maize metaphasic A and B chromosomes determined by image cytometry. Maize Genet Cooperation Newsl 79, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abreu, I. S., Carvalho, C. R., Clarindo, W. R. (2008) Chromosomal DNA content of sweet pepper determined by association of cytogenetic and cytometric tools. Plant Cell Rep 27, 1227–1233.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Doležel, J., Bartoš, J. (2005) Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot Fenn 95, 99–100.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Puech, M., Giroud, F. (1999) Standardization of DNA quantitation by image analysis: quality control of instrumentation. Cytometry 36, 11–17.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hardie, D. C., Gregory, T. R., Hebert, P. D. N. (2002) From pixels to picograms: a beginners’ guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. J Histochem Cytochem 50, 735–749.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feulgen, R., Rossenbeck, H. (1924) Mikroskopisch-chemischer Nachweis einer Nukleinasäure von Typus der Thymonukleinsäure und die darauf beruhende selective Färbung von Zellkernen in mikroskopischen Präparaten. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 135, 203–248.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andor TM Technology (2006) Scientific Digital Camera Solutions Catalog, p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Böcking, A., Adler, C. P., Common, H. H., Hilgarth, M., Granzen, B., Auffermann, W. (1984) Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy. Anal Quant Cytol 6, 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chieco, P., Jonker, A., Melchiorri, C., Vanni, G., Van Noorden, C. J. F. (1994) An user’s guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations. Histochem J 26, 1–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Böcking, A., Giroud, F., Reith, A. (1995) Consensus report of the ESACP task force on standardization of diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 8, 67–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haroske, G., Dimmer, V., Meyer, W., Kunze, K. D. (1997) DNA histogram interpretation based on statistical approaches. Anal Cell Pathol 15, 157–173.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Giroud, F., Haroske, G., Reith, A., Böcking, A. (1998) ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Part II: specific recommendations for quality assurance. Anal Cell Pathol 17, 201–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Haroske, G., Giroud, F., Reith, A., Böcking, A. (1998) ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Part I: basic considerations and recommendations for preparation, measurements and interpretation. Anal Cell Pathol 17, 189–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haroske, G., Baak, J. P. A., Danielsen, H. et al, Giroud, F., Gschwendtner, A., Oberholzer, M., Reith, A., Spieler, P., and Böcking, A. (2001) Fourth updated ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Cell Pathol 23, 89–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chieco, P., Derenzini, M. (1999) The Feulgen reaction 75 years on. Hystochem Cell Biol 111, 345–358.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vilhar, B., Dermastia, M. (2002) Standardization of instrumentation in plant DNA image cytometry. Acta Bot Croat 61, 11–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Carvalho, C. R., Clarindo, W. R., Almeida, P. M. (2007) Plant cytogenetics: still looking for the perfect mitotic chromosomes. Nucleus 50, 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gonçalves, S., Haas, P., Spada, C., Fontana, C. S., Rangel, L., Mendonça, M. A. C., Carvalho, C. R. (2007) Citometria de imagem do conteúdo de DNA nuclear de células epiteliais do colo uterino. Rev Bras de Anál Clín 39, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Doležel, J., Sgorbati, S., Lucretti, S. (1992) Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Plant Physiol 85, 625–631.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnston, J. S., Bennett, M. D., Rayburn, A. L., Galbraith, D. W., Price, H. J. (1999) Reference standards for determination of DNA content of plant nuclei. Am J Bot 86, 609–613.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Thunnissen, F. B. J. M., Perdaen, H., Forrest, J. (1992) Influence of different cell extraction methods on cytometric features. Cytometry 13, 485–489.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Greilhuber, J., Temsch, E. M. (2001) Feulgen densitometry: some observations relevant to best practice in quantitative nuclear DNA content determination. Acta Bot Croat 60, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank CNPq – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and CBP&D/Café – Consórcio Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento do Café, Brazil, for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Roberto Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Humana Press

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Carvalho, C.R., Clarindo, W.R., Abreu, I.S. (2011). Image Cytometry: Nuclear and Chromosomal DNA Quantification. In: Chiarini-Garcia, H., Melo, R. (eds) Light Microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 689. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-950-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-950-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-949-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-950-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics