Simultaneous Visualization of FISH Signals and Bromo-deoxyuridine Incorporation by Formamide-Free DNA Denaturation

  • Daniela Moralli
  • Zoia L. MonacoEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 659)


The replication timing of different DNA sequences in the mammalian cell nucleus is a tightly regulated system, which affects important cellular processes such as genes expression, chromatin epigenetic marking, and maintenance of chromosome structure. For this reason, it is important to study the replication properties of specific sequences, to determine for example, if the replication timing varies in different tissues, or in the presence of specific reagents, such as hormones, or other biologically active molecules. In this chapter, we present a technique, which allows identification of specific DNA sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and simultaneously analyses the incorporation of a thymidine analogue, 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), to mark DNA replication. First, tissue culture cells are synchronized at the beginning of the S-phase. BrdU is then added, either at specific time-points during S-phase or during the whole of the cell cycle. After harvesting the cells, the chromosomal DNA is hybridized to FISH probes that identify specific DNA sequences; this is performed without the teratogen formamide normally used in FISH. Finally, the cell preparations are analysed with an epifluorescence microscope to determine if the sequence of interest incorporates BrdU and in which point of the S-phase.

Key words

BrdU DNA replication FISH 


  1. 1.
    Folle GA. (2008) Nuclear architecture, chromosome domains and genetic damage. Mutat. Res. 658, 172–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watanabe Y, Shibata K, Ikemura T, Maekawa M. (2008) Replication timing of extremely large genes on human chromosomes 11q and 21q. Gene 421, 74–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kemp MG, Ghosh M, Liu G, Leffak M. (2005). The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A alters the pattern of DNA replication origin activity in human cells. Nucleic Acid Res. 33, 325–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Voineagu I, Narayanan V, Lobachev KS, Mirkin SM. (2008). Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: Interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 9936–9941.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbosa AC, Otto PA, Vianna-Morgante AM. (2000) Replication timing of homologous alpha satellite DNA in Roberts syndrome. Chromosome Res. 8, 645–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Antoni S, Mattina T, Di Mare P, et al. (2004) Altered replication timing of the HIRS/Tuple1 locus in the DiGeorge and Velocardiofacial syndromes. Gene 333, 111–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shiraishi Y. (1990) Nature and role of high sister chromatid exchanges in Bloom syndrome cells. Some cytogenetic and immunological aspects. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 50, 175–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moralli D, Monaco ZL. Simultaneous detection of FISH signals and bromo-deoxyuridine incorporation in fixed tissue cultured cells. PLOS ONE 2009, 4(2): e4483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004483 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wellcome Trust Centre for Human GeneticsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations