Advertisement

Long-Term Imaging in Microfluidic Devices

Protocol
First Online:
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 591)

Abstract

During the past 10 years, major developments in live-cell imaging methods have accompanied growing interest in the application of microfluidic techniques to biological imaging. The broad design possibilities of microfabrication and its relative ease of implementation have led to the development of a number of powerful imaging assays. Specifically, there has been great interest in the development of devices in which single cells can be followed in real-time over the course of several generations while the growth environment is changed. With standard perfusion chambers, the duration of a typical experiment is limited to one cell generation time. Using microfluidics, however, long-term imaging setups have been developed which can measure the effects of temporally controlled gene expression or pathway activation while tracking individual cells over the course of many generations. In this paper, we describe the details of fabricating such a microfluidic device for the purpose of long-term imaging of proliferating cells, the assembly of its individual components into a complete device, and then we give an example of how to use such a device to monitor real-time changes in gene expression in budding yeast. Our goal is to make this technique accessible to cell biology researchers without prior experience with microfluidic systems.

Key words

Microfluidic devices long-term imaging live-cell imaging time-lapse fluorescence microscopy PDMS microfabrication temporally controlled gene expression 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Chalfie M., Tu Y., Euskirchen G., Ward W.W. and Prasher D.C. (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tsien R.Y. (1998) The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem 67:509–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaner N.C., Campbell R.E., Steinbach P.A., Giepmans B.N., Palmer A.E. and Tsien R.Y. (2004) Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 22:1567–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldman R.D. and Spector D.L. (2004) Live Cell Imaging. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Voldman J., Gray M.L. and Schmidt M.A. (1999) Microfabrication in biology and medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 1:401–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitesides G.M, Ostuni E., Takayama S., Jiang X. and Ingber D. (2001) Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3:335–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sia S.K., Whitesides G.M. (2003) Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis 24(21): 3563–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balaban N.Q., Merrin J., Chait R., Kowalik L. and Leibler S. (2004) Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 300(5690): 1622–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paliwal S., Iglesias P.A., Campbell K., Hilioti Z., Groisman A. and Levchenko A. (2007) MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast. Nature 446(7131): 46–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hersen P., McClean M.N., Mahadevan L., Ramanathan S. (2008) Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(20):7165–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennett M.R., Pang W.L., Ostroff N.A., Baumgartner B.L., Nayak S., Tsimring L.S., Hasty J. (2008). Metabolic gene regulation in a dynamically changing environment. Nature 454(7208):1119–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonald J.C., Duffy D.C., Anderson J.R., Chiu J.T., Wu H., Schueller O.J.A., Whitesides G.M. (2000) Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Electrophoresis 21:27–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cookson S., Ostroff N., Pang W.L., Volfson D. and Hasty J. (2005) Monitoring dynamics of single-cell gene expression over multiple cell cycles. Mol Syst Biol 1:00024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee P.J., Helman N.C., Lim W.A., and Hung P.J. (2008) A microfluidic system for dynamic yeast cell imaging. BioTechniques 44(1): 91–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charvin G., Cross F.R., Siggia E.D. (2008) A microfluidic device for temporally controlled gene expression and long-term fluorescent imaging in unperturbed dividing yeast cells. PLoS ONE 3:e1468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Joliot-Curie & Laboratoire de PhysiqueEcole Normale SupérieureLyonFrance
  2. 2.The Rockefeller UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite protocol

Buy options