Advertisement

Bacteriophages pp 279-289 | Cite as

Isolation Independent Methods of Characterizing Phage Communities 2: Characterizing a Metagenome

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 502)

Abstract

Current appreciation of the vast expanse of prokaryotic diversity has largely come through molecular phylogenetic exploration of sequence diversity within the universally conserved gene for small subunit ribosomal RNA (16S rDNA). A plethora of methodologies for characterizing the diversity and composition of bacterial communities is based on sequence polymorphisms within this single gene. By comparison, no gene is universally shared among viruses or bacteriophages, which has prevented broad scale characterization of viral diversity within microbial ecosystems. With the reduction in DNA sequencing costs and wide availability of bioinformatics software, the tools of whole genome shotgun sequencing are now beginning to be applied to the characterization of genetic diversity within whole microbial communities. Such metagenomic approaches are ideally suited to the characterization of natural assemblages of viruses, because of the typically small, coding-dense nature of viral genomes. Data from a limited number of characterized viral metagenome libraries within a range of microbial ecosystems indicates that viral assemblages are comprised of between \({\sim}1,000\) to a million different genotypes. Furthermore, viral assemblages typically contain a large proportion of completely novel genes and are likely to be the largest reservoir of unexplored genetic diversity on earth. Here, we present a conceptual framework for characterization of viral assemblages through metagenomic approaches.

Key Words

Nanoclone™ bioinformatics database sequence homology 

References

  1. 1.
    Fleischmann, R.D., Adams, M.D., White, O., Clayton, R.A., Kirkness, E.F., Kerlavage, A.R., Bult, C.J., Tomb, J.F., et al. (1995) Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Venter, J.C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J.F., Halpern, A.L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J.A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., et al. (2004) Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304:66–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLong, E.F., Preston, C.M., Mincer, T., Rich, V., Hallam, S.J., Frigaard, N.U., Martinez, A., Sullivan, M.B., et al. (2006) Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311:496–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tringe, S.G., von Mering, C., Kobayashi, A., Salamov, A.A., Chen, K., Chang, H.W., Podar, M., Short, J.M., et al. (2005) Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308:554–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edwards, R.A. and Rohwer, F. (2005) Viral metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:504–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breitbart, M., Felts, B., Kelley, S., Mahaffy, J.M., Nulton, J., Salamon, P., and Rohwer, F. (2004) Diversity and population structure of a near-shore marine-sediment viral community. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breitbart, M., Salamon, P., Andresen, B., Mahaffy, J.M., Segall, A.M., Mead, D., Azam, F., and Rohwer, F. (2002) Genomic analysis of uncultured marine viral communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:14250–14255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hendrix, R.W., Smith, M.C., Burns, R.N., Ford, M.E., and Hatfull, G.F. (1999) Evolutionary relationships among diverse bacteriophages and prophages: all the world’s a phage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:2192–2197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angly, F.E., Felts, B., Breitbart, M., Salamon, P., Edwards, R.A., Carlson, C., Chan, A.M., Haynes, M., et al. (2006) The Marine Viromes of Four Oceanic Regions. PLoS Biol 4:e368.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paul, J.P. (2006) Personal communication.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W.E., Attiya, S., Bader, J.S., Bemben, L.A., Berka, J., Braverman, M.S., et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bench, S.R., Hanson, T.E., Williamson, K.E., Ghosh, D., Radosovich, M., Wang, K., and Wommack, K.E. (2007) Metagenomic characterization of Chesapeake Bay virioplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7629–7641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schoenfeld, T., Patterson, M., Richardson, P.M., Wommack, K.E., Young, M., and Mead, D. (2008) Use of a novel cloning strategy for comparative metagenomic analysis of viral assemblages from Yellowstone Hot Springers. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4164–4174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14. Wommack, K.E., Bench, S.R., Williamson, K.E., and Radosevich, M. (2004) Viruses in soils: The first terrestrial viral metagenome, In 10th International Symposium for Microbial Ecology, Cancun, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Breitbart, M., Hewson, I., Felts, B., Mahaffy, J.M., Nulton, J., Salamon, P., and Rohwer, F. (2003) Metagenomic analyses of an uncultured viral community from human feces. J Bacteriol 185:6220–6223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cann, A.J., Fandrich, S.E., and Heaphy, S. (2005) Analysis of the virus population present in equine faeces indicates the presence of hundreds of uncharacterized virus genomes. Virus Genes 30:151–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breitbart, M. and Rohwer, F. (2005) Method for discovering novel DNA viruses in blood using viral particle selection and shotgun sequencing. BioTechniques 39:729–736.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ewing, B. and Green, P. (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8:186–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M.C., and Green, P. (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8:175–185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., and Lipman, D.J. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Overbeek, R., Begley, T., Butler, R.M., Choudhuri, J.V., Chuang, H.Y., Cohoon, M., de Crecy-Lagard, V., Diaz, N., et al. (2005) The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:5691–5702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Etwiller, L., Eddy, S.R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K.L., et al. (2002) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 30:276–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., Dolinski, K., et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haft, D.H., Selengut, J.D., and White, O. (2003) The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 31:371–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Büchen-Osmond, C. (2003) The universal virus database ICTVdB. Computing in Science and Engineering 5:16–25.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rohwer, F. and Edwards, R. (2002) The Phage Proteomic Tree: a genome-based taxonomy for phage. J Bacteriol 184:4529–4535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Ocean Sciences DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.Lucigen CorporationMiddletonUSA

Personalised recommendations