Advertisement

Methods to Determine Fitness in Bacteria

  • Cassie F. Pope
  • Timothy D. McHugh
  • Stephen H. GillespieEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 642)

Abstract

Acquisition of antibiotic resistance may be associated with a physiological cost for the bacterium. Determination of growth rate and generation time is often used to measure fitness costs associated with antibiotic resistance. However, fitness costs may be small and difficult to quantify and multiple models are required. Available in vitro models that can be used to measure fitness include quantification of biofilm growth, survival in water, resistance to drying, and measurement of planktonic growth rates. The use of growth curve techniques to determine generation time is laborious, time-consuming, and can introduce sampling error. We have described the use of a semi-automated liquid culture system to estimate generation time in Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria. We have also used the BacT/ALERT system to determine generation time and enumerate bacterial numbers in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We describe methods for measuring biofilm growth and environmental survival in Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria. These methods can be adapted for use with other organisms.

Key words

Fitness Pseudomonas Evolution antibiotic resistance 

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson DI, Levin BR (1999) The biological cost of antibiotic resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:489–493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levin BR, Perrot V, Walker N (1999) Compensatory mutations, antibiotic resistance and the population genetics of adaptive evolution in bacteria. Genetics 154:985–997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillespie SH, McHugh TD (1997) The biological cost of antimicrobial resistance. Trends Microbiol 5:337–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kugelberg E, Lofmark S, Wretlind B, Andersson DI (2005) Reduction of the fitness burden of quinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:22–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillespie SH, Voelker LL, Dickens A (2002) Evolutionary barriers to quinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microb Drug Resist 8:79–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gillespie SH (2001) Antibiotic resistance in the absence of selective pressure. Int J Antimicrob Agents 17:171–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennett AF, Dao KM, Lenski RE (1990) Rapid evolution in response to high-temperature selection. Nature 346:79–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lenski RE, Simpson S, Nguyen TT (1994) Genetic analysis of a plasmid-encoded, host genotype-specific enhancement of bacterial fitness. J Bacteriol 176:3140–3147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lenski RE, Mongold JA, Sniegowski PD, Travisano M, Vasi F, Gerrish PJ, Schmidt T (1998) Evolution of competitive fitness in experimental populations of E. coli: what makes one genotype a better competitor than another? Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73:35–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen TN, Phan QG, Duong LP, Bertrand KP, Lenski RE (1989) Effects of carriage and expression of the Tn10 tetracycline-resistance operon on the fitness of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Biol Evol 6:213–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh PK, Schaefer AL, Parsek MR, Moninger TO, Welsh MJ, Greenberg EP (2000) Quorum sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms. Nature 407:762–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanchez P, Linares JF, Ruiz-Diez B, Campanario E, Navas A, Baquero F, Martinez JL (2002) Fitness of in vitro selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa nalB and nfxB multidrug resistant mutants. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:657–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pope CF, Gillespie SH, Pratten JR, McHugh TD (2007) Fluoroquinolone resistance in Burkholderia cepacia: measuring the fitness costs using models relevant to transmission. J Antimicrob Chemother 52(3):1201–1203Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davies AP, Billington OJ, Bannister BA, Weir WR, McHugh TD, Gillespie SH (2000) Comparison of fitness of two isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, one of which had developed multi-drug resistance during the course of treatment. J Infect 41:184–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Youmans GP, Youmans AS (1949) A method for the determination of the rate of growth of tubercle bacilli by the use of small inocula. J Bacteriol 58:247–255Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laurent F, Lelievre H, Cornu M, Vandenesch F, Carret G, Etienne J, Flandrois JP (2001) Fitness and competitive growth advantage of new gentamicin-susceptible MRSA clones spreading in French hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 47:277–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol 28:449–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miles AA, Misra SS (1938) The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J Hyg 38:496–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cassie F. Pope
    • 1
  • Timothy D. McHugh
    • 2
  • Stephen H. Gillespie
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Medical Microbiology, St. George’s NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Department of InfectionUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations