Transformation of Oats and Its Application to Improving Osmotic Stress Tolerance

  • Shahina B. Maqbool*
  • Heng Zhong
  • Hesham F. Oraby
  • Mariam B. SticklenEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology™ book series (MIMB, volume 478)


Oat (Avena sativa L.), a worldwide temperate cereal crop, is deficient in tolerance to osmotic stress due to drought and/or salinity. To genetically transform the available commercial oat cultivars, a genotype-independent and efficient regeneration system from shoot apical meristems was developed using four oat cultivars: Prairie, Porter, Ogle, and Pacer. All these oat cultivars generated a genotype-independent in vitro differentiated multiple shoots from shoot apical meristems at a high frequency. Using this system, three oat cultivars were genetically co-transformed with pBY520 (containing hva1 and bar) and pAct1-D (containing gus) using biolistic bombardment. Transgenic plants were selected and regenerated using herbicide resistance and GUS as a marker. Molecular and biochemical analyses of putative transgenic plants confirmed the co-integration of hva1 and bar genes with a frequency of 100%, and 61.6% of the transgenic plants carried all three genes (hva1, bar and gus). Further analyses of R0, R1, and R2 progenies confirmed stable integration, expression, and Mendalian inheritance for all transgenes. Histochemical analysis of GUS protein in transgenic plants showed a high level of GUS expression in vascular tissues and in the pollen grains of mature flowers. Immunochemical analysis of transgenic plants indicated a constitutive expression of hva1 at all developmental stages. However, the level of HVA1 was higher during the early seedling stages.

The characteristic of HVA1 expression for osmotic tolerance in transgenic oat progeny was analyzed in vitro as well as in vivo. Transgenic plants exhibited significantly (P <0.05) increased tolerance to stress conditions than non-transgenic control plants. The symptoms of wilting or death of leaves as observed in 80% of non-transgenic plants due to osmotic stress was delayed and detected only in less than 10% of transgenic plants. These observations confirmed the characteristic of HVA1 protein as providing or enhancing the osmotic tolerance in transgenic plants against salinity and possible water-deficiency stress conditions.

Key Words:

Oat (Avena sativa L.) hva1 bar gus shoot apical meristem transgenic, progeny osmotic stress 



The MSU Plant Breeding and Genetics Program, the Northwest Plant Biotechnology Consortium, and Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt, supported this research.


  1. 1.
    Hitchcock, A. S. (1971) Manual of the grasses of the United States. Originally published in 1950 as U.S.D.A. Miscellaneous publication No. 200. Dover, Second edition revised by Chase, A.New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munz, P. A. and Keck, D. D. (1973) A California Flora (with Supplement by P. A. Munz). University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madson, B. A. (1951) Winter Covercrops. Circular 174, California Agricultural Extension Service, College of Agriculture, University of California, June 1951.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnny’s selected seeds (1983) Green Manures – A Mini Manual. Johnny’s selected seeds, Albion, Maine 04910.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verhallen, A., Hayes, A. and Taylor, T. (2003) Cover crops – Oats, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, L. and Benson, G. (2002) Origin, history, and uses of oat (Avena sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum).Course Agronomy 212, Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy, Iowa.Google Scholar
  7. 7. Agriculture crops cereals oats. Saskatchewan Interactive, last updated 14 Dec 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Forsberg, R. A. and Shands, H. L. (1989) ( Janick, J., Oat breeding in Plant Breeding Reviews. Vol. 6,Timber Press, Portland, OR, pp167–207.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyer, J. S. (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218,444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roy, M. Wu, R. (2002) Overexpression of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene in rice increases polyamine level and enhances sodium chloride-stress tolerance. Plant Science 163,987–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Apse, M. P., Aharon, G. S., Snedden, W. A. and Blumwald, E. (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by over expression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis Science 285,1256–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schachtman, D. and Lui, W. (1999) Molecular pieces to the puzzle of the interaction between potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Trends in Plant Science 4,281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qadir, M., Qureshi, R. H. and Ahmad, N. (1998) Horizontal flushing: a promising ameliorative technology for hard saline-sodic and sodic soils. Soil Tillage Research 45,119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cherry, J. H., Locy, R. D. and Rychter, A. (1999) Proc. NATO Adv. Res. Workshop, Mragowa, Poland. 13–19 June. Kluwer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin, R. J., Jamieson, P. D., Gillespie, R. N. and Maley, S. (2001) Effect of timing and intensity of drought on the yield of oats (Avena sativa L.). Proceeding of the 10th Australian Agronomy Conference, Hobart.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murty, A. S., Misra, P. N. and Haider, M. M. (1984) Effect of different salt concentrations on seed germination and seedling development in few oat cultivars. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 18,129–132.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verma, O. P. S. and Yadava, R. B. R. (1986) Salt tolerance of some oats (Avena sativa L.) varieties at germination and seedling stage. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 156,123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schonbeck, M. W. (1988) Cover Cropping and Green Manuring on Small Farms in New England and New York: An Informal Survey. Research Report 10, New Alchemy Institute, East Falmouth, MA 02536.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koev, G., Mohan, B. R., Dinesh-Kumar, S. P., Torbert, K. A., Somers, D. A. and Miller, W. A. (1998) Extreme reduction of disease in oats transformed with the 5’ half of the barley yellow dwarf virus PAV genome. Phytopathology 88,1013–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stoskopf, N. C. (1985 ( Stoskopf, N. C., ed.), ) Barley and Oat, in Cereal Grain Crops,Reston Publishing, Reston, pp. , Virginia444–458.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cushman, J. C. and Bohnert, H. J. (2000) Genomic approach to plant stress tolerance. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 3,117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abebe, T., Guenzi, A. C., Martin, B. and Cushman, J. C. (2003) Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiology 131,1748–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Epstein, E., Norlyn, J., Rush, D., Kingsbury, R., Kelley, D., Cunningham, G. and Wrona, A. (1980) Saline culture of crops: a genetic approach. Science 210,399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ribaut, J. M. and Hoisington, D. A. (1998) Marker assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends in Plant Science 3,236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    FAO. (1999). Biotechnology in food and agriculture. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma, H. C., Crouch, J. H., Sharma, K. K., Seetharama, N. and Hash, C. T. (2002) Application of biotechnology for crop improvement: prospects and constraints. Plant Science 163,381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mazur, B., Krebbers, E. and Tingey, S. (1999) Gene discovery and product development for grain quality traits. Science 285,372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rines, H. W., Phillips, R. L. and Somers, D. A. (1992) Marshall, H. G., and Sorrels, M. E., eds.), Application of tissue culture to oat improvement, in Oat Science and Technology, (American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society, Madison WI, pp. 777–791.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Somers, D. A., Torbert, K. A., Pawlowski, W. P. and Rines, H. W. (1994) Henry, R. J. and Ronalds, J. A., eds.), Genetic engineering of oat, in Improvement of Cereal Quality by Genetic Engineering, (Plenum, New York, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cummings, D. P., Green, C. E. and Stuthman, D. D. (1976) Callus induction and plant regeneration in oats. Crop Science 16,465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rines, H. W. and McCoy, T. J. (1981) Tissue culture initiation and plant regeneration in hexaploid species of oats. Crop Science 21,837–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bregitzer, P., Bushnell, W. R., Somers, D. A. and Rines, H. W. (1989) Development and characterization of friable, embryogenic oat callus. Crop Science 29,798–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rines, H. W. and Luke, H. H. (1985) Selection and regeneration of toxin insensitive plants from tissue cultures of oat (Avena sativa) susceptible to Helminthosporium victoriae. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 71,16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Somers, D. A., Rines, H. W., Gu, W., Kaeppler, H. F. and Bush-Nell, W. R. (1992) Fertile transgenic oat plants. Bio/Technology 10,1589–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, S., Zhong, H. and Sticklen, M. B. (1996) Production of multiple shoots from apical meristems of oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Plant Physiology 148,667–671.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Torbert, K. A., Rines, H. W. and Somers, D. A. (1998) Transformation of oat using mature embryo-derived tissue cultures. Crop Science 38,226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cho, M. J., Jiang, W. and Lemaux, P. G. (1999) High frequency transformation of oat via microprojectile bombardment of seed-derived highly regenerative cultures. Plant Science 148,9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gless, C., Lorz, H. and Jahne-Gartner, A. (1998) Establishment of a highly efficient regeneration system from leaf base segments of oat (Avena sativa L.). Plant Cell Reports 17,441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kaeppler, H. F., Menon, G. K., Skadsen, R. W., Nuutila, A. M. and Carlson, A. R. (2000) Transgenic oat plants via visual selection of cells expressing green fluorescent protein. Plant Cell Reports 19,661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Somers, D. A. (1999) Vasil, I. and PhillipesR., eds.), Genetic engineering of oat, in Molecular Improvement of Cereal Crops, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Choi, H. W., Lemaux, P. G. and Cho, M. J. (2001) High frequency of cytogenetic aberration in transgenic oat (Avena sativa L.) plants. Plant Science 160,761–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang, S., Cho, M. J., Koprek, T., Yun, R., Bregitzer, P. and Lemaux, P. G. (1999) Genetic transformation of commercial cultivars of oat (Avena sativa L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using in vitro shoot meristematic cultures derived from germinated seedlings. Plant Cell Reports 18,959–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhong, H., Srinivasan, C. and Sticklen, M. B. (1992) In vitro morphogenesis of corn (Zea mays L.). II. Differentiation of ear and tassel clusters from cultured shoot apices and immature inflorescences. Planta 187,483–489.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhong, H., Wang, W. and Sticklen, M. B. (1998) In vitro morphogenesis of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench: efficient plant regeneration from shoot apices. Journal of Plant Physiology 153,719–726.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Devi, P., Zhong, H. and Sticklen, M. B. (2000) In vitro morphogenesis of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.): efficient production of multiple shoots and inflorescences from shoot apices. Plant Cell Reports 19,546–550.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ahmad, A., Zhong, H., Wang, W. and Sticklen, M. B. (2001) Shoot apical meristem: In vitro plant regeneration and morphogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In Vitro Cellular and Developmen. Biology-Plant 38,163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Maqbool, S. B., Zhong, H., El-Maghraby, Y., Ahmad, A., Chai, B., Wang, W., Sabzikar, R. and Sticklen, M. B. (2002) Competence of oat (Avena sativa L.) shoot apical meristems on integrative transformation, inherited expression, and osmotic tolerance of transgenic lines containing the hva1. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105,201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xu, D., Duan, X., Wang, B., Hong, B., Ho, T. and Wu, R. (1996) Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiology 110,249–257.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patnaik, D. and Khurana, P. (2003) Genetic transformation of Indian bread (T. aestivum L.) and pasta (T. durum L.) wheat by particle bombardment of mature embryo-derived calli. BMC Plant Biology 3,1–11.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maqbool, S. B., Zhong, H. and Sticklen, M. B. (2004) Curtis, I. S., ed.), Genetic engineering of oat (Avena sativa L.) via the biolistic bombardment of shoot apical meristems, in Transgenic Crops of the World – Essential Protocols, Chap. 5, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Oraby, H. F., Ransom, C. B., Kravchenko, A. N. and Sticklen, M. B. (2005) Barley HVA1 gene confers salt tolerance in R3 transgenic oat. Crop Science 45,2218–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiology Plant 15,473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Strickberger, M. W. (1985) Genetics, 3rd ed. Macmillan, New York, pp. 126–146.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Southern, E. M. (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology 98,503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Lab, New York.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bradford, M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Annals of Biochemistry 72,248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jafferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A. and Bevan, M. W. (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO Journal 6,3901–3907.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lamb, C. R. C., Milach, S. C. K., Pasquali, G. and Barro, R. S. (2002) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration derived from mature embryos of oat. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 37,123–130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shahina B. Maqbool*
    • 1
  • Heng Zhong
    • 2
  • Hesham F. Oraby
    • 3
  • Mariam B. Sticklen
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.SABRIResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of HorticultureMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations