Abstract
The primary responsibility of the skeleton is to bear the loads involved in physical activity without sustaining damage. This capability involves a mecha-nism in which bone cells “assess” the suitability of the bones' existing architecture in relation to their prevailing loading environment and adapt or maintain it accord-ingly. It is widely assumed that the loading-related variable to which the bone cells respond is the strain engendered within the bone tissue. Strain-related adaptation is essential for normal bone development, regulation of strength in relation to exercise, healing of fractures and the success of orthopedic interference. The most widespread failure of this adaptive response is osteoporosis.
Although strain-related bone adaptation can be investigated in these situations in humans in vivo, both the inputs and outputs are difficult to assess and control, and the tissues are unavailable for study. As a consequence much of our understanding of the mechanisms involved in strain-related adaptation have come from studies in ani-mals where the strains within the bone are measured, the loads imposed on the bones can be controlled, and the adaptive changes to cells and architecture determined. Although many animals have been used in the past (1–3), now the most commonly used animal is the mouse. Normal and transgenic mice are available and inbred strains of mice are well characterized physiologically (4). Most importantly, the techniques for measuring strains in mouse bones, loading these bones in a controlled manner, and assessing changes in architecture are all available. This chapter outlines the techniques involved in these three phases of investigation in mouse bone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
1. Rubin, C. T., Lanyon, L. E. (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37, 411–417.
2. Lanyon, L. E., Rubin, C. T., Baust, G. (1986) Modulation of bone loss during calcium insuffi-ciency by controlled dynamic loading. Calcif Tissue Int 38, 209–216.
3. Judex, S., Boyd, S., Qin, Y. X., et al. (2003) Adaptations of trabecular bone to low magnitude vibrations result in more uniform stress and strain under load. Ann Biomed Eng 31, 12–20.
Laboratory, T. J. (1999) http://www.jax.org
5. Turner, C. H., Burr, D. B. (1993) Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone 14, 595–608.
6. De Souza, R. L., Matsuura, M., Eckstein, F., et al. (2005) Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: a new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element. Bone 37, 810–818.
7. Torrance, A., Mosley, J., Suswillo, R., et al. (1994) Non invasive loading of the rat ulna in vivo induces a strain-related modeling response uncomplicated by trauma or periosteal pressure. Calcif Tissue Int 54, 241–247.
8. Fritton, S. P., Rubin, C. T. (2001) In vivo measurement of bone deformation using strain gauges, in (Cowin, S.C., ed.), Bone Mechanics Handbook. CRC Press, Washington, DC.
9. Robling, A. G., Burr, D. B., Turner, C. H. (2001) Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone. J Exp Biol 204, 3389–3399.
10. Lee, K. C., Maxwell, A., Lanyon, L. E. (2002) Validation of a technique for studying func-tional adaptation of the mouse ulna in response to mechanical loading. Bone 31, 407–412.
11. Hagihara, Y., Fukuda, S., Goto, S., et al. (2005) How many days per week should rats undergo running exercise to increase BMD? J Bone Miner Metab 23, 289–294.
12. Judex, S., Lei, X., Han, D., et al. (2006), Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude. J Biomech 40, 1333–1339
13. Srinivasan, S., Weimer, D. A., Agans, S. C., et al. (2002) Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle. J Bone Miner Res 17, 1613–1620.
14. Robling, A. G., Hinant, F. M., Burr, D. B., et al. (2002) Shorter, more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance bone mass. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34, 196–202.
15. Gross, T. S., Poliachik, S. L., Ausk, B. J., et al. (2004) Why rest stimulates bone formation: a hypothesis based on complex adaptive phenomenon. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 32, 9–13.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Alan Thomas from Zwick/Roell, Alex Robling from Indiana University and Massimo Marenzana from the Royal Veterinary College for their contributions to this chapter. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Saxon, L.K., Lanyon, L.E. (2008). Assessment of the In Vivo Adaptive Response to Mechanical Loading. In: Westendorf, J.J. (eds) Osteoporosis. Methods In Molecular Biology™, vol 455. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-104-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-104-8_21
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-828-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-104-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols