Abstract
The large increase in interest in micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) over the last decade reflects the+ need for a method able to non-destructively visualize the internal three-dimensional structure of an object. Thereby, the real beauty of computed tomography lies in the fact that it is available for a large range of nominal resolutions, which allows hierarchical imaging from whole bodies down to the tissue level. Although micro-CT is currently mainly used for imaging of hard tissue (i.e., bone and tooth), future developments might also allow high soft tissue contrast either using appropriate contrast agents or x-ray contrast mechanisms. This chapter aims to review the steps necessary for a successful micro-CT measurement. Although the actual measurement is often machine dependent, the chapter does not describe a specific system but rather lists all steps that eventually have to be considered to set up a measurement, run the measurement, process the image data, and get morphometric indices as a result. The chapter provides an easy understandable manual that should allow newcomers to perform successful measurements and hence to best profit from this powerful technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
1. Radon, J. (1917) Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre Integralwerte längs bes-timmter Mannigfaltigkeiten. Ber Verb Sächs Akad Wiss Leipzig Math-Nat Kl 69, 262–277.
2. Cormack, A. M. (1963) Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. J Appl Phys 34, 2722–2727.
3. Cormack, A. M. (1964) Representation of a function by its line integrals with some radiological applications. II. J Appl Phys 35, 2908–2913.
Hounsfield, G. N. (1972) A method of and apparatus for examination of a body by radiation such as x-ray or gamma radiation. Patent Specification GB.
5. Hounsfield, G. N. (1973) Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 46, 1016–1022.
6. Hounsfield, G. N. (1977) EMI scanner. Proc the Roy Soc London Series B Biol Sci 195, 281–289.
7. Feldkamp, L. A., Goldstein, S. A., Parfitt, A. M., et al. (1989) The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4, 3–11.
8. Müller, R., Rüegsegger, P. (1994) Morphological validation of the 3D structure of non-invasive bone biopsies. Abstracts 10th Int. Workshop on Bone Densitometry. Bone Miner 25, 8.
9. Rüegsegger, P., Koller, B., Müller, R. (1996) A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58, 24–29.
10. Bonse, U., Busch, F. (1996) x-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) using synchrotron radiation (SR). Prog Biophys Mol Biol 65, 133–169.
11. Stampanoni, M., Borchert, G., Abela, R., et al (2002) Bragg magnifier: A detector for submi-crometer x-ray computer tomography. J Appl Phys 92, 7630–7635.
12. Nuzzo, S., Lafage-Proust, M. H., Martin-Badosa, E., et al. (2002) Synchrotron radiation microtomography allows the analysis of three-dimensional microarchitecture and degree of mineralization of human iliac crest biopsy specimens: effects of etidronate treatment. J Bone Miner Res 17, 1372–1382.
13. Nuzzo, S., Peyrin, F., Cloetens, P., et al. (2002) Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. Med Phys 29, 2672–2681.
14. Müller, R., Gerber, S. C., Hayes, W. C. (1998) Micro-compression: a novel technique for the non-destructive assessment of local bone failure. Technol Health Care 6, 433–444.
15. Nazarian, A., Stauber, M., Muller, R. (2005) Design and implementation of a novel mechanical testing system for cellular solids. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 73B, 400–411.
16. Grodzins, L. (1983) Optimum energies for x-ray transmission tomography of small samples. Nuclear Instr Methods 206, 541–545.
17. Gonzalez, R., Woods, R. (2002) Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Odgaard, A. (1997) Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone 20, 315–328.
19. Parfitt, A. M., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., et al. (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2, 595–610.
20. Müller, R., Rüegsegger, P. (1995) Three-dimensional finite element modelling of non-inva-sively assessed trabecular bone structures. Med Eng Phys 17, 126–133.
21. Lorensen, W. E., Cline, H. E. (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graphics 21, 163–169.
22. Hildebrand, T., Rüegsegger, P. (1997) A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 185, 67–75.
23. Danielson, P-E. (1980) Euclidean distance mapping. Comp Vision Graph Image Processing 14, 227–248.
24. Odgaard, A., Gundersen, H. J. (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14, 173–182.
25. Hildebrand, T., Ruegsegger, P. (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1, 15–23.
26. Stauber, M., Müller, R. (2006) Volumetric spatial decomposition of trabecular bone into rods and plates: a new method for local bone morphometry. Bone 38, 475–484.
27. Nishikawa, Y. , Jinnai, H., Koga, T., et al. (1998) Measurements of interfacial curvatures of bicontinuous structure from three-dimensional digital images. 1. A parallel surface method. Langmuir 14, 1242–1249.
28. Hahn, M., Vogel, M., Pompesius-Kempa, M., et al (1992) Trabecular bone pattern factor-a new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone 13, 327–330.
29. Jinnai, H., Watashiba, H., Kajihara, T., et al. (2002) Surface curvatures of trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone 30, 191–194.
30. Whitehouse, W. J. (1974) The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone. J Microsc 101, 153–168.
31. Odgaard, A., Jensen, E. B., Gundersen, H. J. (1990) Estimation of structural anisotropy based on volume orientation. A new concept. J Microsc 157, 149–162.
32. Cruz-Orive, L. M., Karlsson, L. M., Larsen, S. E., et al. (1992) Characterizing anisotropy: a new concept. Micron Microscopica Acta 23, 75–76.
33. Pothuaud, L., Porion, P., Lespessailles, E., et al. (2000) A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture. J Microsc 199, 149–161.
34. Saha, P. K., Chaudhuri, B. B. (1996) 3D digital topology under binary transformation with applications. Comput Vis Image Understanding 63, 418–429.
35. Gomberg, B. R., Saha, P. K., Wehrli, F. W. (2003) Topology-based orientation analysis of trabecular bone networks. Med Phys 30, 158–168.
36. Stauber, M., Rapillard, L., van Lenthe, G. H., et al. (2006) Importance of individual rods and plates in the assessment of bone quality and their contribution to bone stiffness. J Bone Miner Res 21, 586–595.
37. Kohler, T., Beyeler, M., Webster, D., et al. (2005) Compartmental bone morphometry in the mouse femur: reproducibility and resolution dependence of microtomographic measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 77, 281–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Stauber, M., Müller, R. (2008). Micro-Computed Tomography: A Method for the Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Structure of Biological Specimens. In: Westendorf, J.J. (eds) Osteoporosis. Methods In Molecular Biology™, vol 455. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-104-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-104-8_19
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-828-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-104-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols