Nomenclature: Naming Your Gene-Modified Mouse

  • Alicia ValenzuelaEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2066)


For many of us, if we are honest, nomenclature is a tedious, incomprehensible jargon that interferes with presenting and reading research data. While understanding the rules governing nomenclature involves a steep learning curve, the curve is short, and the basics, with a little effort, are grasped relatively quickly.

Like a language, nomenclature is a communication tool that provides a common ground for a disparate group of people. Standardized names provide universally recognized identifiers that can be used by technicians, researchers, purchasing agents, and facility managers, in fact, anyone who uses mice. The formal nomenclature conveys information on the genetics, the technology involved in making the mutation, who created and maintained the strain, and its relationship to other strains. Using a standardized nomenclature for genes, alleles, and strains assists in the goal of reproducible science and helps to bridge the vast amount of data generated by multi-species genome projects.

Key words

Mouse Nomenclature Standardized Names Mouse genetics Mouse strain Gene-modified Reproducible science 


  1. 1.
    Dunn LC, Gruneberg H, Snell GD (1940) Report of the committee on mouse genetics nomenclature. J Hered 31:505–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Committee on Standardized Nomenclature for Mice (2014) Rules and guidelines for nomenclature of mouse and rat strains. Mouse genome informatics. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. http://www.informatics.jax.orgGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davisson MT (1996) Rules for nomenclature of inbred strains. In: Lyon MF, Rastan S, Brown SDM (eds) Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1532–1536Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Festing MFW (1999) Inbred strains of mice. Mouse genome informatics. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. http://www.informatics.jax.orgGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eppig JT, Strivens M (1999) Finding a mouse: the International Mouse Strain Resource (IMSR). Trends Genet 15:81–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mouse phenome database web site (2016) The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  7. 7.
    Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, Sargent E, Asquith S, Crew V, Johnson KA, Robinson P, Scott VE, Wiles MV (2004) An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Genome Res 14(9):1806–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) (2016) U.S. National Academy of Sciences Washington DC.
  9. 9.
    Chia R, Achilli F, Festing MFW, Fisher EMC (2005) The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat Genet 37(11):1181–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silver LM (1995) Mouse genetics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (2016).
  12. 12.
    Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF (2014) ZFN, TALEN and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31(7):397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sander JD, Joung JK (2014) CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol 32:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, Sander JK (2013) High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol 31(9):822–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Gene Trap Consortium (2016).
  16. 16.
    Flurkey K, Currer J (eds) (2009) The Jackson Laboratory handbook on genetically standardized mice. The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, MaineGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Jackson LaboratoryBar HarborUSA

Personalised recommendations