Skip to main content

Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization in the Developing Chicken Brain

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Brain Development

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2047))

  • 1852 Accesses

Abstract

One of the first steps in studies of gene function is the spatiotemporal analysis of patterns of gene expression. Indirect immunohistochemistry is a method that allows the detection of a protein of interest by incubating a histological section with an antibody or antiserum raised against the protein, and then localizing this primary antibody with a tagged secondary antibody. To determine the cellular source of a protein of interest, or if a specific antibody is not available, specific transcripts can be localized using in situ hybridization. A histological section is incubated with a labeled RNA probe that is complementary to the target transcript; after hybridization with the target transcript the labeled RNA probe can be identified with an antibody. Here we describe materials and methods used to perform basic indirect immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization on frozen sections through the developing chicken brain, emphasizing controls and potential problems that may be encountered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coons AH, Creech HJ Jr, Jones RN, Berliner E (1942) The demonstration of pneumococcal antigen in tissues by the use of fluorescent antibody. J Immunol 45:159–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beutner EH, Witebsky E (1963) Studies on organ specificity. XV. Immunohistologic evaluation of reactions produced by thyroid autoantibodies. J Immunol 91:204–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akam ME (1983) The location of ultrabithorax transcripts in Drosophila tissue sections. EMBO J 2:2075–2084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hafen E, Levine M, Garber RL, Gehring WJ (1983) An improved in situ hybridization method for the detection of cellular RNAs in Drosophila tissue sections and its application for localizing transcripts of the homeotic Antennapedia gene complex. EMBO J 2:617–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garner CC, Tucker RP, Matus A (1988) Selective localization of messenger RNA for cytoskeletal protein MAP2 in dendrites. Nature 336:674–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkinson DG (ed) (1998) In situ hybridization: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 224

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zeller R, Rogers M, Harami AG, Carrasceo AS (2001) In situ hybridization to cellular RNA. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 14:Unit 14.3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishii T, Hirota J, Mombaerts P (2003) Combinatorial coexpression of neural and immune multigene families in mouse vomeronasal sensory neurons. Curr Biol 13:394–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iezzoni JC, Kang JH, Bucana CD, Reed JA, Brigati DJ (1993) Rapid colorimetric detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA by in situ hybridization. J Clin Lab Anal 7:247–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodkin DK, Knudson DL (1985) Assessment of sequence relatedness of double-stranded RNA genes by RNA-RNA blot hybridization. J Virol Methods 10:45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans MF, Aliesky HA, Cooper K (2003) Opimization of biotinyl-tyramide-based in situ hybridization for sensitive background-free applications on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. BMC Clin Pathol 3:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrington CS, Graham AK, Flannery DM, Burns J, McGee JO (1990) Discrimination of closely homologous HPV types by nonisotopic in situ hybridization: definition and derivation of tissue melting temperatures. Histochem J 22:545–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrington CS, Anderson SM, Graham AK, McGee JO (1993) The discrimination of high-risk HPV types by in situ hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction. Histochem J 25:191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Herrington CS, McGee JO (1994) Discrimination of closely homologous human genomic and viral sequences in cells and tissues: further characterization of Tmt. Histochem J 26:545–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard P. Tucker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Tucker, R.P., Ishimaru, T., Gong, Q. (2020). Immunohistochemistry and In Situ Hybridization in the Developing Chicken Brain. In: Sprecher, S. (eds) Brain Development. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2047. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9732-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9732-9_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9731-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9732-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics