Abstract
Structural modeling plays a key role in protein function prediction on a genome-wide scale. For B and T lymphocyte receptors, the critical functional question is: which antigens and epitopes are targeted? With emerging B cell receptor (BCR) and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing methods improving in both breadth and depth, there is a growing need for methods that can help answer this question. Since lymphocyte-antigen recognition depends on complementarity, structural modeling is likely to play an important role in understanding antigen specificity and affinity. In the case of BCRs, such modeling methods have a long history in the study and design of antibodies. However, for TCRs there are relatively few publicly available modeling tools, and, to our knowledge, none that incorporate interaction between TCRs and peptide-MHC (pMHC) complexes. Here, we provide a web-based tool, ImmuneScape (https://sysimm.org/immune-scape/), to carry out TCR-pMHC modeling as a first step toward structure-based function prediction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Almagro JC, Teplyakov A, Luo J, Sweet RW, Kodangattil S, Hernandez-Guzman F, Gilliland GL (2014) Second antibody modeling assessment (AMA-II). Proteins 82(8):1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.24567
Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H (2003) Announcing the worldwide protein data bank. Nat Struct Biol 10(12):980. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb1203-980
Larsen MV, Lundegaard C, Lamberth K, Buus S, Lund O, Nielsen M (2007) Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 8:424. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-424
Roomp K, Antes I, Lengauer T (2010) Predicting MHC class I epitopes in large datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 11:90. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-90
Wang P, Sidney J, Dow C, Mothe B, Sette A, Peters B (2008) A systematic assessment of MHC class II peptide binding predictions and evaluation of a consensus approach. PLoS Comput Biol 4(4):e1000048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000048
Rosati E, Dowds CM, Liaskou E, Henriksen EKK, Karlsen TH, Franke A (2017) Overview of methodologies for T-cell receptor repertoire analysis. BMC Biotechnol 17(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0379-9
Altman JD, Moss PA, Goulder PJ, Barouch DH, McHeyzer-Williams MG, Bell JI, McMichael AJ, Davis MM (1996) Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science 274(5284):94–96
Maryanski JL, Jongeneel CV, Bucher P, Casanova JL, Walker PR (1996) Single-cell PCR analysis of TCR repertoires selected by antigen in vivo: a high magnitude CD8 response is comprised of very few clones. Immunity 4(1):47–55
Shugay M, Bagaev DV, Zvyagin IV, Vroomans RM, Crawford JC, Dolton G, Komech EA, Sycheva AL, Koneva AE, Egorov ES, Eliseev AV, Van Dyk E, Dash P, Attaf M, Rius C, Ladell K, McLaren JE, Matthews KK, Clemens EB, Douek DC, Luciani F, van Baarle D, Kedzierska K, Kesmir C, Thomas PG, Price DA, Sewell AK, Chudakov DM (2018) VDJdb: a curated database of T-cell receptor sequences with known antigen specificity. Nucleic Acids Res 46(D1):D419–D427. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx760
Liang S, Liu S, Zhang C, Zhou Y (2007) A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys. Proteins 69(2):244–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21498
Lepore R, Olimpieri PP, Messih MA, Tramontano A (2017) PIGSPro: prediction of immunoGlobulin structures v2. Nucleic Acids Res 45(W1):W17–W23. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx334
Weitzner BD, Jeliazkov JR, Lyskov S, Marze N, Kuroda D, Frick R, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Biswas N, Dunbrack RL Jr, Gray JJ (2017) Modeling and docking of antibody structures with Rosetta. Nat Protoc 12(2):401–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.180
Klausen MS, Anderson MV, Jespersen MC, Nielsen M, Marcatili P (2015) LYRA, a webserver for lymphocyte receptor structural modeling. Nucleic Acids Res 43(W1):W349–W355. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv535
Yamashita K, Ikeda K, Amada K, Liang S, Tsuchiya Y, Nakamura H, Shirai H, Standley DM (2014) Kotai antibody builder: automated high-resolution structural modeling of antibodies. Bioinformatics 30(22):3279–3280. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu510
Leem J, Dunbar J, Georges G, Shi J, Deane CM (2016) ABodyBuilder: automated antibody structure prediction with data-driven accuracy estimation. MAbs 8(7):1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2016.1205773
Schritt D, Li S, Rozewicki J, Katoh K, Yamashita K, Volkmuth W, Cavetc G, Standley DM (2019) Repertoire builder: high-throughput structural modeling of B and T cell receptors. Mol Syst Des Eng. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9ME00020H
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
Hoof I, Peters B, Sidney J, Pedersen LE, Sette A, Lund O, Buus S, Nielsen M (2009) NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans. Immunogenetics 61(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-008-0341-z
Jensen KK, Andreatta M, Marcatili P, Buus S, Greenbaum JA, Yan Z, Sette A, Peters B, Nielsen M (2018) Improved methods for predicting peptide binding affinity to MHC class II molecules. Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12889
Jurtz V, Paul S, Andreatta M, Marcatili P, Peters B, Nielsen M (2017) NetMHCpan-4.0: improved peptide-MHC class I interaction predictions integrating eluted ligand and peptide binding affinity data. J Immunol 199(9):3360–3368. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700893
Nielsen M, Andreatta M (2016) NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets. Genome Med 8(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0288-x
Alexandrov N, Shindyalov I (2003) PDP: protein domain parser. Bioinformatics 19(3):429–430
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W (2012) CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28(23):3150–3152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
Kozakov D, Hall DR, Xia B, Porter KA, Padhorny D, Yueh C, Beglov D, Vajda S (2017) The ClusPro web server for protein-protein docking. Nat Protoc 12(2):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.169
Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr (2009) Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 77(4):778–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.22488
Schmid N, Eichenberger AP, Choutko A, Riniker S, Winger M, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (2011) Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7. Eur Biophys J 40(7):843–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-011-0700-9
Standley DM, Toh H, Nakamura H (2007) ASH structure alignment package: sensitivity and selectivity in domain classification. BMC Bioinformatics 8:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-116
Rozewicki J, Li S, Amada KM, Standley DM, Katoh K (2019) MAFFT-DASH: integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 47(W1):W5–W10. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Li, S. et al. (2019). Structural Modeling of Lymphocyte Receptors and Their Antigens. In: Kaneko, S. (eds) In Vitro Differentiation of T-Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2048. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9728-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9728-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9727-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9728-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols