Advertisement

Culture of Human Preimplantation Embryos in a Clinical ART Setting

Protocol
First Online:
  • 1.1k Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2006)

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo culture in the human is a unique endeavor. Human assisted reproductive technology (ART) is practiced clinically to treat infertility. Due to the obvious ethical considerations of ART as applied to human medicine, only rarely is embryo culture undertaken for research purposes. As most IVF clinics are for profit businesses, a robust industry has developed to supply embryologists with quality control-tested media, equipment, and supplies necessary to support human IVF laboratory operation. Moreover, commercial items are preferred for efficiency and consistency, and strict quality control is required by accrediting organizations. As such, very little manual formulation or preparation of culture medium is typically required. Although human embryo culture is performed clinically, there is a surprising degree of variability in the details of the techniques used. In this chapter, we describe state-of-the-art procedures for gamete collection, in vitro fertilization, embryo culture, and embryo transfer that result in excellent blastocyst development and pregnancy rates for patients seeking treatment for infertility.

Key words

Sequential media Single step media Blastocyst In vitro embryo culture IVF 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) (2017) 2015 Assisted reproductive technology national summary report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, Banker M, Dyer S (2018) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril 110:1067–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine (2017) The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online 35:494–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) (2008) Revised guidelines for human embryology and andrology laboratories. Fertil Steril 90:S45–S59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Loendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PMM, Repping S, van der Veen F (2010) Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 16:577–589.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morbeck DE, Leonard PH (2012) Culture systems: mineral oil overlay. Methods Mol Biol 912:325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards RG, Steptoe PC, Purdy JM (1980) Establishing full term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitro. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 87:737–756.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1980.tb04610.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berger T, Marrs RP, Moyer DL (1985) Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 43:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyne RV, Stojanoff A, Clarke GN, Lopata A, Johnston WI (1986) Pregnancy from in vitro fertilization of human eggs after separation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 45:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veeck L (ed) (1986) Atlas of the human oocyte and early conceptus, vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120200110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 52:709–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yanagimachi R (1995) Is an animal model needed for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and other assisted reproduction technologies? Hum Reprod 10:2525–2526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alikani M, Cohen J (1992) Advances in clinical micromanipulation of gametes and embryos. Assisted fertilization and hatching. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:373–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alikani M, Cohen J, Palermo GD (1995) Enhancement of fertilization by micromanipulation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 7:182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mansour R (1998) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a state of the art technique. Hum Reprod Update 4:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tesarik J, Mendoza C (1999) In vitro fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. BioEssays 21:791–801.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-1878(199909)21:9<791::aid-bies11>3.0.co;2-zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E (1998) Treatment of severe male infertility by micromanipulation-assisted fertilization: news and views. Front Biosci 3:E238–E246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meldrum DR, Chetkowski R, Steingold KA, de Ziegler D, Cedars MI, Hamilton M (1987) Evolution of a highly successful in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril 48:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reed ML (2012) Culture systems: embryo density. Methods Mol Biol 912:273–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB (2000b) Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 73:1155–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen J (1991) Assisted hatching of human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 8:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z (1992) Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod 7:685–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alteri A, Vigano P, Maizar AA, Jovine L, Giacomini E, Rubino P (2018) Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols. J Assist Reprod Genet 35:367–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1118-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB (1999) Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 11:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Schoolcraft WB (2000a) Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Hum Reprod 15(Suppl 6):9–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cohen J, Rieger D (2012) Historical background of gamete and embryo culture. Methods Mol Biol 912:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quinn P (2014) Culture media, solutions, and systems in human ART. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Machtinger R, Racowsky C (2012) Culture systems: single step. Methods Mol Biol 912:199–209.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Quinn P (2012) Culture systems: sequential. Methods Mol Biol 912:211–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-971-6_13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Youssef MM, Mantikou E, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S, Mastenbroek S (2015) Culture media for human pre-implantation embryos in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD007876.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007876.pub2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Comar V, Mattila M, Vagnini LD, Renzi A, Petersen B, Ricci J, Oliveira JBA, Baruffi RLR, Franco JG Jr (2017) Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod 21:240–246.  https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorado Center for Reproductive MedicineLone TreeUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite protocol

Buy options