Abstract
The Reasoning Engine for Interaction Networks (RE:IN) is a tool that was developed initially for the study of pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. A set of critical factors that regulate the pluripotent state had been identified experimentally, but it was not known how these genes interacted to stabilize self-renewal or commit the cell to differentiation. The methodology encapsulated in RE:IN enabled the exploration of a space of possible network interaction models, allowing for uncertainty in whether individual interactions exist between the pluripotency factors. This concept of an “abstract” network was combined with automated reasoning that allows the user to eliminate models that are inconsistent with experimental observations. The tool generalizes beyond the study of stem cell decision-making, allowing for the study of interaction networks more broadly across biology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P et al (2008) Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133:1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043
Lu R, Markowetz F, Unwin RD et al (2009) Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 462:358–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08575
van den Berg DLC, Snoek T, Mullin NP et al (2010) An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6:369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.014
Som A, Harder C, Greber B et al (2010) The PluriNetWork: an electronic representation of the network underlying pluripotency in mouse, and its applications. PLoS One 5:e15165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015165
Yeo J-C, Ng H-H (2013) The transcriptional regulation of pluripotency. Cell Res 23:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.172
Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B (2003) Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00017-6
Kühl M, Kracher B, Groß A, Kestler HA (2014) Mathematical models of Wnt signaling pathways. In: Wnt Signal. Dev. Dis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 153–160
Davidson EH (2010) Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks. Nature 468:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09645
S a K (1969) Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J Theor Biol 22:437–467
Thomas R (1973) Boolean formalization of genetic control circuits. J Theor Biol 42:563–585
Le Novère N (2015) Quantitative and logic modelling of molecular and gene networks. Nat Rev Genet 16:146–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3885
Yordanov B, Dunn S-J, Kugler H et al (2016) A method to identify and analyze biological programs through automated reasoning. npj Syst Biol Appl 2:–16010. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjsba.2016.10
Li F, Long T, Lu Y et al (2004) The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. PNAS 101:4781–4786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0305937101
Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H et al (2017) The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein–protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D362–D368. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw937
Martello G, Bertone P, Smith AG (2013) Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor. EMBO J:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.177
Martello G, Sugimoto T, Diamanti E et al (2012) Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 11:491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.008
Hall J, Guo G, Wray J et al (2009) Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 5:597–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.003
Silva J, Nichols J, Theunissen TW et al (2009) Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138:722–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.039
Tai C-I, Ying Q-L (2013) Gbx2, a LIF/Stat3 target, promotes reprogramming to and retention of the pluripotent ground state. J Cell Sci 126:1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.118273
Lanner F, Lee KL, Sohl M et al (2010) Heparan sulfation-dependent fibroblast growth factor signaling maintains embryonic stem cells primed for differentiation in a heterogeneous state. Stem Cells 28:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.265
Dunn S-J, Martello G, Yordanov B et al (2014) Defining an essential transcription factor program for naive pluripotency. Science (80- ) 344:1156–1160. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248882
Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recogn Lett 31:651–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011
Ying Q-L, Wray J, Nichols J et al (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06968
De Moura L, Bjørner N (2008) Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In: Tools algorithms constr. anal. syst. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 337–340
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Dunn, SJ. (2019). Automated Formal Reasoning to Uncover Molecular Programs of Self-Renewal. In: Cahan, P. (eds) Computational Stem Cell Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1975. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9224-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9224-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9223-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9224-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols