ITC Measurement for High-Affinity Aptamers Binding to Their Target Proteins

  • Ryo Amano
  • Tomohisa Furukawa
  • Taiichi SakamotoEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1964)


Aptamers are nucleic acid molecules that bind to a target molecule with high affinity and specificity, which are generated by a process known as systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). Because of their high affinity and specificity, aptamers were developed as therapeutic agents. Although aptamers are investigated as promising therapeutic agents, the mechanism of their high affinity and specificity is not clear. Therefore, structural and biophysical studies are important to know that. To date, ITC is increasingly being used to study the thermodynamic basis of aptamer–target protein interactions. Understanding the mechanism of aptamer binding would contribute to their development for therapeutic applications. In this chapter, we describe the protocol to study the thermodynamics of aptamer–protein interactions.

Key words

Aptamer Protein C value Competition Heat capacity change 



This study was supported by research grants of Innovative Area, Structural Cell Biology (Number 23121528), and the Strategic Research Foundation Grant-aided Project for Private Universities (Number S1101001) from the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan.


  1. 1.
    Tuerk C, Gold L (1990) Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellington AD, Szostak JW (1990) In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346:818–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stoltenburg R, Reinemann C, Strehlitz B (2007) SELEX-A (r)evolutionary method to generate high-affinity nucleic acid ligands. Biomol Eng 24:381–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keefe AD, Pai S, Ellington AD (2010) Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakamura Y, Ishiguro A, Miyakawa S (2012) RNA plasticity and selectivity applicable to therapeutics and novel biosensor development. Genes Cells 17:344–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ng EW, Shima DT, Calias P, Cunningham ET Jr, Guyer DR, Adamis AP (2006) Pegaptanib, a targeted anti-VEGF aptamer for ocular vascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou B, Wang B (2006) Pegaptanib for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Exp Eye Res 83:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Potty AS, Kourentzi K, Fang H, Jackson GW, Zhang X, Legge GB, Willson RC (2009) Biophysical characterization of DNA aptamer interactions with vascular endothelial growth factor. Biopolymers 91:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Potty AS, Kourentzi K, Fang H, Schuck P, Willson RC (2011) Biophysical characterization of DNA and RNA aptamer interactions with hen egg lysozyme. Int J Biol Macromol 48:392–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanakaraj I, Chen W-H, Poongavanam M, Dhamane S, Stagg LJ, Ladbury LE, Kourentzi K, Strych U, Willson RC (2013) Biophysical characterization of VEGF–aHt DNA aptamer interactions. Int J Biol Macromol 57:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheung YW, Kwok J, Law AW, Watt RM, Kotaka M, Tanner JA (2013) Structural basis for discriminatory recognition of Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase by a DNA aptamer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:15967–15972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amano R, Takada K, Tanaka Y, Nakamura Y, Kawai G, Kozu T, Sakamoto T (2016) Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analyses of Interaction between a High-Affinity RNA Aptamer and Its Target Protein. Biochemistry 55:6221–6229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pica A, Russo Krauss I, Parente V, Tateishi-Karimata H, Nagatoishi S, Tsumoto K, Sugimoto N, Sica F (2017) Through-bond effects in the ternary complexes of thrombin sandwiched by two DNA aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res 45:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sakamoto T, Ennifar E, Nakamura Y (2017) Thermodynamic study of aptamers binding to their target proteins. Biochimie 145:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prabhu NV, Sharp KA (2005) Heat capacity in proteins. Annu Rev Phys Chem 56:521–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oda M, Nakamura H (2000) Thermodynamic and kinetic analyses for understanding sequence-specific DNA recognition. Genes Cells 5:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tahirov TH, Inoue-Bungo T, Morii H, Fujikawa A, Sasaki M, Kimura K, Shiina M, Sato K, Kumasaka T, Yamamoto M, Ishii S, Ogata K (2001) Structural analyses of DNA recognition by the AML1/Runx-1 Runt domain and its allosteric control by CBFβ. Cell 104:755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera – a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25:1605–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryo Amano
    • 1
  • Tomohisa Furukawa
    • 1
  • Taiichi Sakamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Advanced Engineering, Department of Life ScienceChiba Institute of TechnologyNarashino-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations