Tumor Profiling pp 73-87 | Cite as
Clinical Validation of Targeted Solid Tumor Profiling
- 1 Citations
- 1.6k Downloads
Abstract
Large-scale tumor profiling studies have generated massive amounts of data that have been instrumental for the detection of recurrent driver mutations in many tumor types. These driver mutations as well as the concurrent passenger mutations are now being used for a more accurate diagnosis of the tumor and prognosis for the patient. Moreover, therapeutic inhibitors toward specific mutations are already on the market and many clinical trials are ongoing to approve novel therapeutic drugs. The broad-range identification of these somatic mutations is key to this tailored personalized medicine approach, which preferentially has to be performed by a multigene multihotspot method such as massive parallel sequencing, also called next generation sequencing (NGS). The implementation of NGS in molecular diagnostics of tumor profiling however, requires a firm validation to minimize the occurrence of false positives and false negatives, thereby yielding highly accurate and robust clinical data.
Here, we describe the different performance characteristics as well as quality metrics that should be analyzed for the robust diagnostic validation of tumor profiling in order to meet the requirements of international standards specific for medical laboratories, such as the ISO15189:2012 standard. These metrics include assays that assess the precision, limit of detection, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and robustness of the entire workflow from DNA enrichment up to the final report.
Key words
Solid tumor Validation NGS Target enrichment Diagnostic screening Variant classificationReferences
- 1.Thomas A, Rajan A, Lopez-Chavez A et al (2013) From targets to targeted therapies and molecular profiling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ann Oncol 24:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Damodaran S, Berger MF, Roychowdhury S (2015) Clinical tumor sequencing: opportunities and challenges for precision cancer medicine. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 35:e175–e182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Johnson DB, Dahlman KH, Knol J et al (2014) Enabling a genetically informed approach to cancer medicine: a retrospective evaluation of the impact of comprehensive tumor profiling using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel. Oncologist 19:616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ et al (2013) Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes. J Mol Diagn 15:607–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Froyen G, Broekmans A, Hillen F et al (2016) Validation and application of a custom-designed targeted next-generation sequencing panel for the diagnostic mutational profiling of solid Tumors. PLoS One 11:e0154038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Luthra R, Chen H, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Singh RR (2015) Next-generation sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostics of cancer: advantages and challenges. Cancers (Basel) 7:2023–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gagan J, Van Allen EM (2015) Next-generation sequencing to guide cancer therapy. Genome Med 7:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gargis AS, Kalman L, Berry MW et al (2012) Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice. Nat Biotechnol 30:1033–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Aziz N, Zhao Q, Bry L et al (2015) College of American Pathologists’ laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P et al (2013) ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med 15:733–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cuomo AM, Zucker HA, Dreslin S (2015) New York state department of health: next generation sequencing (NGS) guidelines for somatic genetic variant detection. http://www.wadsworth-org/labcert/TestApproval/forms/NextGenSeq_ONCO_Guidelines pdf
- 12.Bennett NC, Farah CS (2014) Next-generation sequencing in clinical oncology: next steps towards clinical validation. Cancers (Basel) 6:2296–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Deans ZC, Costa JL, Cree I et al (2016) Integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical diagnostic molecular pathology laboratories for analysis of solid tumours; an expert opinion on behalf of IQN path ASBL. Virchows Arch 470:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Heydt C, Fassunke J, Kunstlinger H et al (2014) Comparison of pre-analytical FFPE sample preparation methods and their impact on massively parallel sequencing in routine diagnostics. PLoS One 9:e104566CrossRefGoogle Scholar