Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Procurement and Storage of Pleural and Peritoneal Fluids for Biobanking

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Biobanking

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1897))

  • 5931 Accesses

Abstract

There is limited information regarding the biobanking of pleural and peritoneal fluids that might supplement storage of pulmonary and thoracic tissue biospecimens. Such fluids are sometimes collected for clinical analyses and may have uses that obviate or supplement tissue samples. There has been a growing interest in using liquid biopsies as they are less invasive and may be amenable to analyses that guide targeted therapies. Integrating cytology and biobanking approaches, we describe techniques that may be used for collecting and banking pleural and peritoneal fluids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rothwell E, Maschke KJ, Botkin JR et al (2015) Biobanking research and human subjects protections: perspectives of IRB leaders. IRB 37:8–13

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McIntosh LD, Sharma MK, Mulvihill D et al (2015) caTissue Suite to OpenSpecimen: developing an extensible, open source, web-based biobanking management system. J Biomed Inform 57:456–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mullins P, Pugh R, Vaught J (2015) Following up on ISBER (2015): call for environmental biobanking papers. Biopreserv Biobank 13:229–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rush A, Battisti R, Barton B, Catchpoole D (2015) Opinions of young adults on re-consenting for biobanking. J Pediatr 167(4):925–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheelock AM, Paulson L, Litton JE, EuPA Biobank Initiative Group (2015) The EuPA Biobank Initiative: meeting the future challenges of biobanking in proteomics & systems medicine. J Proteome 127(Pt B):414–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tupasela A, Snell K, Canada JA (2015) Constructing populations in biobanking. Life Sci Soc Policy 11:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Milley KM, Nimmo JS, Bacci B, Ryan SD, Richardson SJ, Danks JA, DogMATIC (2015) A remote biospecimen collection kit for biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 13:247–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Joly Y, Dalpe G, So D, Birko S (2015) Fair shares and sharing fairly: a survey of public views on open science, informed consent and participatory research in biobanking. PLoS One 10:e0129893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowton EA, Collier SP, Wang X et al (2015) Phenotype-driven plasma biobanking strategies and methods. J Pers Med 5:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallinan D, Friedewald M (2015) Open consent, biobanking and data protection law: can open consent be ‘informed’ under the forthcoming data protection regulation? Life Sci Soc Policy 11:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pekar G, Davies H, Lukacs AP et al (2016) Biobanking multifocal breast carcinomas: sample adequacy with regard to histology and DNA content. Histopathology 68(3):411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Locock L, Boylan AM (2015) Biosamples as gifts? How participants in biobanking projects talk about donation. Health Expect 19(4):805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leusmann P, Veeck J, Jakel J et al (2015) Towards sustainable data management in professional biobanking. Stud Health Technol Inform 212:94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofer P, Neururer S, Hauffe H, Insam T, Zeilner A, Gobel G (2015) Semi-automated evaluation of biomedical ontologies for the biobanking domain based on competency questions. Stud Health Technol Inform 212:65–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castillo-Pelayo T, Babinszky S, LeBlanc J, Watson PH (2015) The importance of biobanking in cancer research. Biopreserv Biobank 13:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amin W, Parwani AV, Melamed J et al (2013) National mesothelioma virtual bank: a platform for collaborative research and mesothelioma biobanking resource to support translational research. Lung Cancer Int 2013:765748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank. https://mesotissue.org/. Accessed Nov 2015

  18. Krishnamurthy S (2015) Biospecimen repositories and cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol 123:152–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perskvist N, Norman I, Eklund C, Litton JE, Dillner J (2013) The Swedish cervical cytology biobank: sample handling and storage process. Biopreserv Biobank 11:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arbyn M, Andersson K, Bergeron C et al (2011) Cervical cytology biobanks as a resource for molecular epidemiology. Methods Mol Biol 675:279–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arbyn M, Van Veen EB, Andersson K et al (2010) Cervical cytology biobanking in Europe. Int J Biol Markers 25:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boulet GA, Horvath CA, Berghmans S et al (2008) Cervical cytology biobanking: quality of DNA from archival cervical Pap-stained smears. J Clin Pathol 61:637–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ugolini D, Neri M, Bennati L et al (2012) CREST biorepository for translational studies on malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer and other respiratory tract diseases: Informatics infrastructure and standardized annotation. Exp Ther Med 3:540–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ugolini D, Neri M, Canessa PA et al (2008) The CREST biorepository: a tool for molecular epidemiology and translational studies on malignant mesothelioma, lung cancer, and other respiratory tract diseases. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17:3013–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tumor Bank Caen University Hospital. https://www.chu-caen.fr/page.php?famille=8&idpage=126. Accessed Nov 2015

  26. National Cancer Institute: Best Practices for Biospecimens Resources (2016) https://biospecimens.cancer.gov/bestpractices/2016-NCIBestPractices.pdf

  27. Perskvist N, Bjorklund C, Dillner J (2014) A complex intervention for workflow enhancement at the Swedish cervical cytology biobank. Biopreserv Biobank 12:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hubel A, Spindler R, Skubitz AP (2014) Storage of human biospecimens: selection of the optimal storage temperature. Biopreserv Biobank 12:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCullough J, Haley R, Clay M et al (2010) Long-term storage of peripheral blood stem cells frozen and stored with a conventional liquid nitrogen technique compared with cells frozen and stored in a mechanical freezer. Transfusion 50:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hubel K, Rodger E, Gaviria JM et al (2005) Effective storage of granulocytes collected by centrifugation leukapheresis from donors stimulated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Transfusion 45:1876–1889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hubel A, Carlquist D, Clay M, McCullough J (2004) Liquid storage, shipment, and cryopreservation of cord blood. Transfusion 44:518–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hubel A, Carlquist D, Clay M, McCullough J (2003) Cryopreservation of cord blood after liquid storage. Cytotherapy 5:370–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hubel A, Carlquist D, Clay M, McCullough J (2003) Short-term liquid storage of umbilical cord blood. Transfusion 43:626–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mora M, Angelini C, Bignami F et al (2015) The EuroBioBank Network: 10 years of hands-on experience of collaborative, transnational biobanking for rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 23:1116–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Castle PE, Solomon D, Hildesheim A et al (2003) Stability of archived liqui-based cervical cytologic specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 99:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Galli J, Oelrich J, Taussig MJ et al (2015) The Biobanking Analysis Resource Catalogue (BARCdb): a new research tool for the analysis of biobank samples. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1158–D1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Klingstrom T (2013) Biobanking in emerging countries. Biopreserv Biobank 11:329–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Killian JK, Walker RI, Suuriniemi M et al (2010) Archival fine-needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) samples: untapped resource for clinical molecular profiling. J Mol Diagn 12:739–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ladd DC, O’Sullivan-Mejia E, Lea T et al (2011) Preservation of fine needle aspiration specimens for future use in RNA-based molecular testing. Cancer Cytopathol 119:102–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Murphy PG, Henderson DT, Adams MD et al (2009) Isolation of RNA from cell lines and cervical cytology specimens stored in BD Sure Path preservative fluid and downstream detection of housekeeping gene and HPV E6 expression using real time RT-pCR. J Virol Methods 156:138–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Tarkowski TA, Rajeevan MS, Lee DR et al (2001) Improved detection of viral RNA isolated from liquid-based cytology samples. Mol Diagn 6:125–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Alberto M. Marchevsky, Shikha Bose & Beatrice Knudsen

Authors
  1. Alberto M. Marchevsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shikha Bose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beatrice Knudsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto M. Marchevsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brain Tumor Translational Resource, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    William H. Yong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Marchevsky, A.M., Bose, S., Knudsen, B. (2019). Procurement and Storage of Pleural and Peritoneal Fluids for Biobanking. In: Yong, W. (eds) Biobanking. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1897. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8935-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8935-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8933-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8935-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation