Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology pp 71–86Cite as

Going Back to Basics: How to Master the Art of Making Scientifically Sound Questions

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

Abstract

Inspired by the famous quote of Leonardo da Vinci, this chapter builds upon the idea that practice without theory is blind and unpredictable. Indeed, theory without practice can be idle. Accordingly, progress in science is made through approaches that integrate hypothesis testing and falsifiability or that investigate weight of evidence for multiple hypothesis, such as the hypothetico-deductive method (HDM) and Bayesian techniques. Here, we provided a straightforward way to combine the HDM with statistical thinking to create a diagram that links variables by causal links, which can improve the scientific method and statistical literacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

Notes

  1. 1.

    After Pickett et al. [25].

References

  1. Popper K (1959) The logic of scientific discovery, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metz AM (2008) Teaching statistics in biology: using inquiry-based learning to strengthen understanding of statistical analysis in biology laboratory courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 7:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horgan GW, Elston DA, Franklin MF, Glasbey CA, Hunter EA, Talbot M, Kempton RA, McNicol JW, Wright F (1999) Teaching statistics to biological research scientists. J R Stat Soc D Stat 48:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot 47:33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips O, Gentry AH (1993) The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ Bot 47:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Albuquerque UP, Hanazaki N (2009) Five problems in current ethnobotanical research – and some suggestions for strengthening them. Hum Ecol 37:653–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neyman J, Pearson ES (1933) On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Phil T R Soc A 231:289–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Num Ecol, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonçalves PHS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM (2016) The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: a meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 26:2238–2253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM (2009) Plant invasions and the niche. J Ecol 97:609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saul WC, Jeschke JM (2015) Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions. Ecol Lett 18:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Platt JR (1964) Strong inference: certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science 146:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2012) A primer of ecological statistics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Publishers, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ford ED (2004) Scientific method for ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martínez-Abraín A (2008) Statistical significance and biological relevance: a call for a more cautious interpretation of results in ecology. Acta Oecol 34:9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whitlock M, Schluter D (2015) The analysis of biological data, 2nd edn. Roberts and Co. Publishers, Greenwood Village, CO

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ, Inouye BD, Strong DR (2014) P values, hypothesis testing, and model selection: it’s déjà vu all over again. Ecology 95:609–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McIntosh A, Pontius J (2016) Science and the global environment: case studies for integrating science and the global environment, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruxton GD, Colegrave N (2016) Experimental design for the life sciences, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vellend M (2016) The theory of ecological communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Magnusson WE, Mourão G, Costa F (2015) Statistics without math, 2nd edn. Editora Planta, Londrina

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arlidge SM, Thanukos A, Bean JR (2017) Using the understanding science flowchart to illustrate and bring students’ science stories to life. Bull Ecol Soc Am 98:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ, Beissinger SR, Benton T, Cameron DD, Carmel Y, Coomes DA, Coulson T, Emmerson MC, Hails RS, Hays GC, Hodgson DJ, Hutchings MJ, Johnson D, Jones JPG, Keeling MJ, Kokko H, Kunin WE, Lambin X, Lewis OT, Malhi Y, Mieszkowska N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Norris K, Phillimore AB, Purves DW, Reid JM, Reuman DC, Thompson K, Travis JMJ, Turnbull LA, Wardle DA, Wiegand T (2013) Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol 101:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pickett ST, Kolasa J, Jones CG (2007) Ecological understanding: the nature of theory and the theory of nature, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  26. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Díaz S, Echeverria-Londoño S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann JPW, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dawson W, Moser D, Mvan K, Kreft H, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Weigelt P, Winter M, Lenzner B, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Cassey P, Scrivens SL, Economo EP, Guénard B, Capinha C, Seebens H, García-Díaz P, Nentwig W, García-Berthou E, Casal C, Mandrak NE, Fuller P, Meyer C, Essl F (2017) Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, Schmitz OJ, Smith DW, Wallach AD, Wirsing AJ (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldenberg SU, Nagelkerken I, Ferreira CM, Ullah H, Connell SD (2017) Boosted food web productivity through ocean acidification collapses under warming. Glob Change Biol 23:4177–4184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reed J, Vianen JV, Barlow J, Sunderland T (2017) Have integrated landscape approaches reconciled societal and environmental issues in the tropics? Land Use Policy 63:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu J, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi X, Rao E, Lu F, Wang X, Daily GC, Ouyang Z (2017) Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:1601–1606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI (2017) The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Clim Change 140:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Niggli U, Fliessbach A, Hepperly P, Scialabba N (2009) Low greenhouse gas agriculture: mitigation and adaptation potential of sustainable farming systems. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  34. Blanchard JL, Watson RA, Fulton EA, Cottrell RS, Nash KL, Bryndum-Buchholz A, Büchner M, Carozza DA, Cheung WWL, Elliott J, Davidson LNK, Dulvy NK, Dunne JP, Eddy TD, Galbraith E, Lotze HK, Maury O, Müller C, Tittensor DP, Jennings S (2017) Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1240–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chaffin BC, Garmestani AS, Angeler DG, Herrmann DL, Stow CA, Nyström M, Sendzimir J, Hopton ME, Kolasa J, Allen CR (2016) Biological invasions, ecological resilience and adaptive governance. J Environ Manag 183:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Savolainen V, Williamson EM, Forest F, Wagstaff SJ, Baral SR, Watson MF, Pendry CA, Hawkins JA (2012) Phylogenies reveal predictive power of traditional medicine in bioprospecting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:15835–15840

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Hawkins JA, Greenhill SJ, Pendry CA, Watson MF, Tuladhar-Douglas W, Baral SR, Savolainen V (2014) The evolution of traditional knowledge: environment shapes medicinal plant use in Nepal. Proc R Soc B 281:20132768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindenmayer DB, Sato C (2018) Hidden collapse is driven by fire and logging in a socioecological forest ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:5181–5186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Goodness J, Andersson E, Anderson PML, Elmqvist T (2016) Exploring the links between functional traits and cultural ecosystem services to enhance urban ecosystem management. Ecol Indic 70:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Solar RRC, Barlow J, Ferreira J, Berenguer E, Lees AC, Thomson JR, Louzada J, Maués M, Moura NG, Oliveira VHF, Chaul JCM, Schoereder JH, Vieira ICG, MacNally R, Gardner TA (2015) How pervasive is biotic homogenization in human-modified tropical forest landscapes? Ecol Lett 18:1108–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ethnobiology Working Group (2003) Intellectual imperatives in ethnobiology. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stepp JR (2005) Advances in ethnobiological field methods. Field Method 17:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Albuquerque UP, Ferreira Júnior WS (2017) What do we study in evolutionary ethnobiology? Defining the theoretical basis for a research program. Evol Biol 44:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Clarke AC (2013) Ethnobiology: the missing link in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 28:67–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Albuquerque UP (2013) How to improve the quality of scientific publications in ethnobiology. Ethnobiol Cons 2:1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratório de Ecologia Filogenética e Funcional (ECOFFUN), Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Thiago Gonçalves-Souza

  2. Laboratório de Síntese em Biodiversidade, Setor de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

    Diogo B. Provete

  3. Laboratório de Ecologia de Metacomunidades, Instituto Latino-Americano de Ciências da Vida e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil

    Michel V. Garey

  4. Laboratório de Ecologia Teórica: Integrando Tempo, Biologia e Espaço (LET.IT.BE), Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil

    Fernando R. da Silva

  5. Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução de Sistemas Socioecológicos (LEA), Departamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

Authors
  1. Thiago Gonçalves-Souza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diogo B. Provete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel V. Garey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fernando R. da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiago Gonçalves-Souza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

    Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

  2. Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraiba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil

    Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena

  3. Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

    Luiz Vital Fernandes Cruz da Cunha

  4. Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil

    Rômulo Romeu Nóbrega Alves

Glossary

After Pickett et al. [25].

Assumption

Conditions needed to sustain a hypothesis or build the theory.

Hypothesis

Testable statement derived from or representing various components of a theory.

Mechanism

Direct interaction of a causal relationship that results in a phenomenon.

Pattern

Repeated events, recurring entities or replicated relationships observed in time or space.

Phenomenon

An observable event, entity or relationship.

Prediction

A statement of expectation deduced from the logical structure or derived from the causal structure of a theory.

Process

A subset of phenomena in which events follow one another in time or space, which may or may not be causally connected. It is cause, mechanism or constraint explaining a pattern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Gonçalves-Souza, T., Provete, D.B., Garey, M.V., da Silva, F.R., Albuquerque, U.P. (2019). Going Back to Basics: How to Master the Art of Making Scientifically Sound Questions. In: Albuquerque, U., de Lucena, R., Cruz da Cunha, L., Alves, R. (eds) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology . Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8918-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8919-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation