Measuring Dorsoventral Pattern and Morphogen Signaling Profiles in the Growing Neural Tube
Developmental processes are inherently dynamic and understanding them requires quantitative measurements of gene and protein expression levels in space and time. While live imaging is a powerful approach for obtaining such data, it is still a challenge to apply it over long periods of time to large tissues, such as the embryonic spinal cord in mouse and chick. Nevertheless, dynamics of gene expression and signaling activity patterns in this organ can be studied by collecting tissue sections at different developmental stages. In combination with immunohistochemistry, this allows for measuring the levels of multiple developmental regulators in a quantitative manner with high spatiotemporal resolution. The mean protein expression levels over time, as well as embryo-to-embryo variability can be analyzed. A key aspect of the approach is the ability to compare protein levels across different samples. This requires a number of considerations in sample preparation, imaging and data analysis. Here we present a protocol for obtaining time course data of dorsoventral expression patterns from mouse and chick neural tube in the first 3 days of neural tube development. The described workflow starts from embryo dissection and ends with a processed dataset. Software scripts for data analysis are included. The protocol is adaptable and instructions that allow the user to modify different steps are provided. Thus, the procedure can be altered for analysis of time-lapse images and applied to systems other than the neural tube.
Key wordsNeural tube Spinal cord Tissue development Morphogen gradient Pattern formation Quantitative imaging
We thank J. Briscoe and T. Bollenbach for comments on the manuscript. Funding: IST Austria and European Research Council under European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (680037) (MZ, AK).
- 5.Oosterveen T, Kurdija S, Alekseenko Z, Uhde CW, Bergsland M, Sandberg M, Andersson E, Dias JM, Muhr J, Ericson J (2012) Mechanistic differences in the transcriptional interpretation of local and long-range Shh Morphogen signaling. Dev Cell 23:1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.09.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Peterson KA, Nishi Y, Ma W, Vedenko A, Shokri L, Zhang X, McFarlane M, Baizabal JM, Junker JP, van Oudenaarden A, Mikkelsen T, Bernstein BE, Bailey TL, Bulyk ML, Wong WH, McMahon AP (2012) Neural-specific Sox2 input and differential Gli-binding affinity provide context and positional information in Shh-directed neural patterning. Genes Dev 26:2802–2816. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.207142.112CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Behringer R, Gertsenstein M, Nagy K (2013) Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual, fourth edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bronner-Fraser M (2011) Avian embryology, Methods cell biol, vol 87, 2nd edn, pp 1–409Google Scholar