Advertisement

Characterization of Eukaryotic Microbiome Using 18S Amplicon Sequencing

Protocol
First Online:
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1849)

Abstract

With the advent of low-cost, high-throughput sequencing, taxonomic profiling of complex microbial communities through 16S rRNA marker gene surveys has received widespread interest, uncovering a wealth of information concerning the bacterial composition of microbial communities, as well as their association with health and disease. On the other hand, little is known concerning the eukaryotic components of microbiomes. Such components include single-celled parasites and multicellular worms that are known to adversely impact the health of millions of people worldwide. Current molecular methods to detect eukaryotic microbes rely on the use of directed PCR analyses that are limited by their inability to inform beyond the taxon targeted. With increasing interest to develop equivalent marker-based surveys as used for bacteria, this chapter presents a stepwise protocol to characterize the diversity of eukaryotic microbes in a sample, using amplicon sequencing of hypervariable regions in the eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene.

Key words

Microbiome Eukaryotic microbes Amplicon sequencing Taxonomic assignment 18S rRNA Illumina MiSeq 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Gill SR et al (2006) Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312:1355–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin F-PJ et al (2007) A top-down systems biology view of microbiome-mammalian metabolic interactions in a mouse model. Mol Syst Biol 3:112.  https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maurice CF, Haiser HJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2013) Xenobiotics shape the physiology and gene expression of the active human gut microbiome. Cell 152:39–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL (2005) An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122:107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanley SL Jr, Reed SL (2001) Microbes and microbial toxins: paradigms for microbial-mucosal interactions. VI. Entamoeba histolytica: parasite-host interactions. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 280:G1049–G1054.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.6.G1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Upcroft P, Upcroft JA (2001) Drug targets and mechanisms of resistance in the anaerobic protozoa. Clin Microbiol Rev 14:150–164.  https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.14.1.150-164.2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen LO, Vedel Nielsen H, Stensvold CR (2013) Waiting for the human intestinal Eukaryotome. Isme j 7:1253–1255.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parfrey LW et al (2014) Communities of microbial eukaryotes in the mammalian gut within the context of environmental eukaryotic diversity. Front Microbiol 5:298.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00298CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR, Rajilic-Stojanovic M, Heilig HG, De Vos WM, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD (2014) The microbial eukaryote Blastocystis is a prevalent and diverse member of the healthy human gut microbiota. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90:326–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12396CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Underhill DM, Iliev ID (2014) The mycobiota: interactions between commensal fungi and the host immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 14:405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3684CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hadziavdic K, Lekang K, Lanzen A, Jonassen I, Thompson EM, Troedsson C (2014) Characterization of the 18S rRNA gene for designing universal eukaryote specific primers. PLoS One 9:e87624.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087624CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hugerth LW et al (2014) Systematic design of 18S rRNA gene primers for determining eukaryotic diversity in microbial consortia. PLoS One 9:e95567.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loy A, Horn M, Wagner M (2003) probeBase: an online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res 31:514–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Machida RJ, Knowlton N (2012) PCR primers for metazoan nuclear 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences. PLoS One 7:e46180.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pawlowski J et al (2012) CBOL protist working group: barcoding eukaryotic richness beyond the animal, plant, and fungal kingdoms. PLoS Biol 10:e1001419.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Y, Tian RM, Gao ZM, Bougouffa S, Qian PY (2014) Optimal eukaryotic 18S and universal 16S/18S ribosomal RNA primers and their application in a study of symbiosis. PLoS One 9:e90053.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quast C et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amaral-Zettler LA, McCliment EA, Ducklow HW, Huse SM (2009) A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS One 4:e6372.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hart ML, Meyer A, Johnson PJ, Ericsson AC (2015) Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Feces of Multiple Host Species for Downstream Next-Generation Sequencing. PLoS One 10:e0143334.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dawson SC, Pace NR (2002) Novel kingdom-level eukaryotic diversity in anoxic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8324–8329.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062169599CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim E et al (2011) Newly identified and diverse plastid-bearing branch on the eukaryotic tree of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:1496–1500.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013337108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carlton JM et al (2007) Draft genome sequence of the sexually transmitted pathogen Trichomonas vaginalis. Science 315:207–212.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132894CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner MJ et al (2002) Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 419:498–511.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Odronitz F, Kollmar M (2007) Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2,269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species. Genome Biol 8:R196.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parfrey LW et al (2010) Broadly sampled multigene analyses yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life. Syst Biol 59:518–533.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H, Burger G, Roger AJ, Gray MW, Philippe H, Lang BF (2007) Toward resolving the eukaryotic tree: the phylogenetic positions of jakobids and cercozoans. Curr Biol 17:1420–1425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tekle YI, Grant JR, Kovner AM, Townsend JP, Katz LA (2010) Identification of new molecular markers for assembling the eukaryotic tree of life. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55:1177–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.03.010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bates ST, Berg-Lyons D, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Knight R, Fierer N (2012) A preliminary survey of lichen associated eukaryotes using pyrosequencing. Lichenologist 44:137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282911000648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Andrews S (2017) FastQC. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 6 Mar 2017
  32. 32.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12.  https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahe F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oksanen JB, Guillaume F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  38. 38.
    Wickham H (2017) stringr: Simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. R package version 1.2.0.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wickham H (2007) Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw 21:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caporaso JG et al (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schloss PD et al (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01541-09CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    DeSantis TZ et al (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5069–5072.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cole JR et al (2014) Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D633–D642.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mercier C (2018) Sumaclust: fast and exact clustering of sequences. https://git.metabarcoding.org/obitools/sumaclust.git. Accessed 28 Jan 2018
  47. 47.
    Mahe F, Rognes T, Quince C, de Vargas C, Dunthorn M (2014) Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. PeerJ 2:e593.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schloss PD, Westcott SL (2011) Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3219–3226.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02810-10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glockner FO (2012) SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28:1823–1829.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Molecular MedicineThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Department of Molecular GeneticsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite protocol

Buy options