Advertisement

Stereological Methods to Quantify Cell Loss in the Huntington’s Disease Human Brain

  • Nasim F. Mehrabi
  • Malvindar K. Singh-Bains
  • Henry J. Waldvogel
  • Richard L. M. Faull
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1780)

Abstract

Design-based stereology is a quantification method to obtain a precise and unbiased estimate of the total number of cells (or any other objects) in a well-defined region of interest. There are two comparable stereological counting methods, (a) the Optical Fractionator and (b) the Nv:Vref method. Due to the adherence to strict stereological protocol, the Optical Fractionator is the most unbiased and preferable stereological method. However, the Nv:Vref method can be an alternative when tissue availability is limited. Both methods use systematic random sampling (SRS) techniques to account for the inhomogeneous nature of biological tissue. Here we describe the criteria for a successful and accurate stereological study, using human brain tissue.

Key words

Design-based stereology StereoInvestigator Optical Fractionator Human brain Huntington’s disease 

References

  1. 1.
    Thu DC, Oorschot DE, Tippett LJ et al (2010) Cell loss in the motor and cingulate cortex correlates with symptomatology in Huntington’s disease. Brain 133:1094–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim EH, Thu DC, Tippett LJ et al (2014) Cortical interneuron loss and symptom heterogeneity in Huntington disease. Ann Neurol 75:717–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nana AL, Kim EH, Thu DC et al (2014) Widespread heterogeneous neuronal loss across the cerebral cortex in Huntington's disease. J Huntingtons Dis 3:45–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mehrabi NF, Waldvogel HJ, Tippett LJ et al (2016) Symptom heterogeneity in Huntington’s disease correlates with neuronal degeneration in the cerebral cortex. Neurobiol Dis 96:67–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh-Bains MK, Tippett LJ, Hogg VM et al (2016) Globus pallidus degeneration and clinico-pathological features of Huntington’s disease. Ann Neurol 80:185–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmitz C, Hof P (2005) Design-based stereology in neuroscience. Neuroscience 130:813–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cavalieri B, Lombardo-Radice L (1966) Geometria degli indivisibili di Bonaventura Cavalieri, vol 5. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gundersen H, Jensen E (1987) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 147:229–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waldvogel HJ, Curtis MA, Baer K et al (2006) Immunohistochemical staining of post-mortem adult human brain sections. Nat Protoc 1:2719–2732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    West MJ, Gundersen H (1990) Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 296:1–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slomianka L, West MJ (2005) Estimators of the precision of stereological estimates: an example based on the CA1 pyramidal cell layer of rats. Neuroscience 136:757–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    West MJ (1999) Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias. Trends Neurosci 22:51–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andersen B, Gundersen H (1999) Pronounced loss of cell nuclei and anisotropic deformation of thick sections. J Microsc 196:69–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV, Kieu K, Nielsen J (1999) The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology—reconsidered. J Microsc 193:199–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nasim F. Mehrabi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Malvindar K. Singh-Bains
    • 1
    • 2
  • Henry J. Waldvogel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard L. M. Faull
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Brain Research, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Medical ImagingUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations