Advertisement

Photosynthesis pp 105-120 | Cite as

Sub-saturating Multiphase Flash Irradiances to Estimate Maximum Fluorescence Yield

  • Thomas J. AvensonEmail author
  • Aaron J. Saathoff
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1770)

Abstract

Many intricacies of leaf-level photosynthesis can be probed by combining infrared gas analysis with pulse-amplitude-modulation chlorophyll a fluorometry. A key fluorescence yield (ΦF) parameter required for estimating many of the phenomena associated with the light reactions of photosynthesis is referred to as the maximum ΦF, which is termed Fm′ when measured on a light-adapted leaf. While ubiquitously used to assess many aspects of photosynthesis, Fm′ is problematic because it is prone to being underestimated. This error can be propagated to parameters and phenomena that are based on estimation of Fm′. Theoretical and experimental observations have shown that ΦF increases hyperbolically in response to increasing irradiance, asymptotically approaching the maximum ΦF, or Fm′, at extreme irradiances. Importantly, depending upon the convexity of the hyperbolic response, ΦF exhibits a linear and inverse relationship with the reciprocal of irradiance, a relationship previously referred to as a reciprocal plot. Given the negative slope of the reciprocal plot, estimates of ΦF at infinite irradiance can be obtained, even over sub-saturating irradiances, by linear regression and extrapolation of the resultant reciprocal plot to the y-intercept. Here, we show how to obtain data from a dynamic multiphase flash of sub-saturating irradiance, occurring within the time span of ~1 s, to generate a reciprocal plot that subsequently provides an accurate estimate of ΦF at infinite irradiance, or Fm′.

Key words

Maximum fluorescence yield Multiphase flash Photosynthesis Photosystem II Pulse-amplitude-modulation chlorophyll a fluorescence Saturation flash 

References

  1. 1.
    Schreiber U (2004) Pulsed-amplitude-modulation (PAM) fluorometry and saturation pulse method: an overview. In: Papageorgiou (ed) Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Earl HJ, Ennahli S (2004) Estimating photosynthetic electron transport via chlorophyll fluorometry without Photosystem II light saturation. Photosynth Res 82:177–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loriaux SD et al (2013) Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub-saturating intensity. Plant Cell Environ 36:1755–1770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Markgraf T, Berry JA (1990) Measurement of photochemical and non-photochemical quenching: correction for trunover of PSII during steady-state photosynthesis. In: Baltscheffski M (ed) Current research in photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schatz GH, Brock H, Holzwarth AR (1988) Kinetic and energetic model for the primary processes in photosystem II. Biophys J 54:397–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kramer DM, Johnson G, Kiirats O, Edwards GE (2004) New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth Res 79:209–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muller P, Li XP, Niyogi KK (2001) Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol 125:1558–1566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kramer DM, Crofts AR (1996) Control and measurement of photosynthetic electron transport in vivo. In: Baker NR (ed) Photosynthesis and the environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Genty BE, Briantas JM, Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards GE, Baker NR (1993) Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? Photosynth Res 37:89–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kulheim C, Ågren J, Jansson S (2002) Rapid regulation of light harvesting and plant fitness in the field. Science 297:91–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lavergne J, Trissl H-W (1995) Theory of fluorescence induction in photosystem II: derivation of analytical expressions in a model including exciton-radical-pair equilibrium and restricted energy transfer between photosynthetic units. Biophys J 68:2474–2492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003) Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J Exp Bot 54:2393–2401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Long SP, Garcia RL (1996) Measurement of leaf and canopy photosynthetic CO2 exchange in the field. J Exp Bot 47:1629–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nishio JN, Sun J, Vogelmann TC (1993) Carbon fixation gradients across spinach leaves do not follow internal light gradients. Plant Cell 5:953–961CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidi SL, Ort DR (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis improve crop yields? Plant Cell Environ 29:315–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LI-COR BiosciencesLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations