Whole-Slide Imaging for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1756)

Abstract

Whole-slide imaging revolutionizes the field of pathology especially in the areas of facilitation of research, long-term storages, exchange of information, and image analysis. In this process, a scanning equipment (scanner) scans the whole glass slide into a digital file. In research in esophageal adenocarcinoma or other cancers, whole-slide imaging could help in production of high-resolution images for studying and sharing of research information, assessment of tissue microarray slides as well as allowing digital image analysis of the tissue information such as level of staining (e.g., HER2) in a more efficient and objective manner. In this chapter, we will elaborate the concepts, advantages, barriers, and the operations of whole-slide imaging scanning.

Key words

Whole-slide imaging Scanning Esophageal adenocarcinoma Image analysis TMA 

References

  1. 1.
    Volynskaya Z, Evans AJ, Asa SL (2017) Clinical applications of whole-slide imaging in anatomic pathology. Adv Anat Pathol 24:215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saco A, Bombi JA, Garcia A, Ramírez J, Ordi J (2016) Current status of whole-slide imaging in education. Pathobiology 83:79–88.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000442391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyce BF (2015) Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching. Biotech Histochem 90:321–330.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295.2015.1033463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farris AB, Cohen C, Rogers TE, Smith GH (2017) Whole slide imaging for analytical anatomic pathology and telepathology: practical applications today, promises, and perils. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141:542–550.  https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0265-SA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Y, McManus DT, Arthur K, Johnston BT, Kennedy AJ, Coleman HG, Murray LJ, Hamilton PW (2015) Whole slide image cytometry: a novel method to detect abnormal DNA content in Barrett’s esophagus. Lab Investig 95:1319–1330.  https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2015.98 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nunes C, Rocha R, Buzelin M, Balabram D, Foureaux F, Porto S, Gobbi H (2014) High agreement between whole slide imaging and optical microscopy for assessment of HER2 expression in breast cancer: whole slide imaging for the assessment of HER2 expression. Pathol Res Pract 210:713–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.06.031. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilbur DC, Brachtel EF, Gilbertson JR, Jones NC, Vallone JG, Krishnamurthy S (2015) Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemistry interpretation: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation. J Pathol Inform 6:22.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.157788 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Janabi S, Horstman A, van Slooten HJ, Kuijpers C, Lai-A-Fat C, van Diest PJ, Jiwa M (2016) Validity of whole slide images for scoring HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridisation in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 69:992–997.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helin HO, Tuominen VJ, Ylinen O, Helin HJ, Isola J (2016) Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry. Virchows Arch 468:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1868-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cancer Molecular Pathology of School of MedicineGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations