Assessment of the Absolute Excitatory Level of the Retina by Flicker ERG

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1753)

Abstract

Electroretinography (ERG) is important for functional diagnostics of the retina. Types of information about retinal function obtainable by ERG differ depending on recording conditions, e.g., a combination of light stimulus and adaptation. In terms of stimulation, single-flash and flicker stimuli are frequently used because response properties have been well investigated, allowing an assessment of fundamental retinal functionality; for example, how photoreceptors and bipolar cells, including signal transmission between them, are affected under pathological conditions. Usually, ERGs are recorded with a nonzero lower cutoff frequency of amplifiers to avoid certain artifacts, and additionally, responses are averaged over time so that non-event-related signals are cancelled out. However, the improved signal quality is associated with a loss of information. Especially in steady-state flicker ERG, information about the absolute baseline of recordings is missing because the prestimulus baseline is not included on the recording trace as well as because a zero response is obtained in all cases in which the signal baseline stays constant for a sufficient amount of time. In other words, it is impossible to tell from the conventional flicker ERG whether a zero signal is obtained under conditions of maximal or no excitation of the visual system. In this chapter, we describe a direct current ERG protocol (featuring a lower cutoff frequency of zero) with repetitive single flashes mimicking conventional flicker that contains a defined onset. Using this recording protocol, it is possible to assess not only the absolute excitatory level of the retina but also the development of steady-state responses from the single flash response.

Key words

Mouse Flicker Direct current electroretinography Rod Cone Depolarizing bipolar cell 

References

  1. 1.
    Frishman LJ, Wang MH (2011) Electroretinogram of human, monkey and mouse. In: Levin LA, Nilsson SF, Ver Hoeve J, SM W, Kaufman PL, Alm A (eds) Adler’s physiology of the eye, 11th edn. Saunders Elsevier, New York, pp 480–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tanimoto N, Sothilingam V, Kondo M et al (2015) Electroretinographic assessment of rod- and cone-mediated bipolar cell pathways using flicker stimuli in mice. Sci Rep 5:10731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanimoto N, Akula JD, Fulton AB et al (2016) Differentiation of murine models of “negative ERG” by single and repetitive light stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 132:101–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanimoto N, Michalakis S, Weber BH et al (2016) In-depth functional diagnostics of mouse models by single-flash and flicker electroretinograms without adapting background illumination. Adv Exp Med Biol 854:619–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abd-El-Barr MM, Pennesi ME, Saszik SM et al (2009) Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways in the dark-adapted mouse retina. J Neurophysiol 102:1945–1955CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Naka KI, Rushton WA (1966) S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol 185:587–599CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matthews HR, Fain GL (2003) The effect of light on outer segment calcium in salamander rods. J Physiol 552:763–776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanimoto N, Sothilingam V, Gloeckner G et al (2013) Auditory event-related signals in mouse ERG recordings. Doc Ophthalmol 128:25–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinKielGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Ophthalmic ResearchUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations