Cell Migration pp 341-350 | Cite as

Analysis of Random Migration of Dictyostelium Amoeba in Confined and Unconfined Environments

  • Christof Litschko
  • Julia Damiano-Guercio
  • Stefan Brühmann
  • Jan FaixEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1749)


Dictyostelium discoideum has proven to be an excellent model to study amoeboid cell migration. During their life cycle, Dictyostelium cells exhibit distinct modes of motility. Individual growth-phase cells explore new territories by random cell migration using the core cell motility machinery, but they can also hunt bacteria by detection and chemotaxis toward the by-product folate. After depletion of nutrients, the cells initiate a developmental program allowing streaming of the cells into aggregation centers by chemotaxis toward cAMP and by cell-to-cell adhesion. Subsequent development is associated with complex rotational movement of the compacted aggregates to drive cell type specific sorting, which in turn is necessary for terminal culmination and formation of fruiting bodies. Here we describe a protocol for the analyses of cell motility of vegetative Dictyostelium cells in unconfined and mechanically confined settings.

Key words

Cell migration Dictyostelium Confinement Cell tracking Agar overlay Random migration Amoeboid motility 



This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grants FA 330/9-1 and FA330/11-1).


  1. 1.
    Bozzaro S (2013) The model organism Dictyostelium discoideum. In: Eichinger L, Rivero F (eds) Dictyostelium discoideum protocols, Methods in molecular biology, vol 983. Springer, New York, NY, pp 17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faix J, Linkner J, Nordholz B et al (2013) The application of the Cre-loxP system for generating multiple knock-out and knock-in targeted loci. In: Eichinger L, Rivero F (eds) Dictyostelium discoideum protocols, Methods in molecular biology, vol 983. Springer, New York, NY, pp 249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Derivery E, Lombard B, Loew D, Gautreau A (2009) The wave complex is intrinsically inactive. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:777–790. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yumura S, Mori H, Fukui Y (1984) Localization of actin and myosin for the study of ameboid movement in Dictyostelium using improved immunofluorescence. J Cell Biol 99:894–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramalingam N, Franke C, Jaschinski E et al (2015) A resilient formin-derived cortical actin meshwork in the rear drives actomyosin-based motility in 2D confinement. Nat Commun 6:8496. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Litschko C (2017) Dicty Tracking: A standalone tool for fast and easy tracking of migrating Dictyostelium cells. figshare.
  8. 8.
    Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I (2012) Methods for cell and particle tracking. In: Conn PM (ed) Imaging and spectroscopic analysis of living cells. Methods Enzymol 504:183–200Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roman Gorelik, Alexis Gautreau, (2014) Quantitative and unbiased analysis of directional persistence in cell migration. Nature Protocols 9 (8):1931-1943Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christof Litschko
    • 1
  • Julia Damiano-Guercio
    • 1
  • Stefan Brühmann
    • 1
  • Jan Faix
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Biophysical ChemistryHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations