Rat Fecal Metabolomics-Based Analysis

  • Olga Deda
  • Helen G. Gika
  • Georgios A. Theodoridis
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1738)

Abstract

Fecal metabolomics-based analysis indisputably constitutes a very useful tool for elucidating the biochemistry of digestion and absorption of the gastrointestinal system. Fecal samples represent the most suitable, non-invasive, specimen for the study of the symbiotic relationship between the host and the intestinal microbiota.

It is well established that the balance of the intestinal microbiota changes in response to some stimuli, physiological such as gender, age, diet, exercise and pathological such as gastrointestinal and hepatic disease. Fecal samples have been analyzed using the most widespread analytical techniques, namely, NMR spectroscopy, GC-MS, and LC-MS/MS. Rat fecal sample is a frequently used and particularly useful substrate for metabolomics-based studies in related fields. The complexity and diversity of the nature of fecal samples require careful and skillful handling for the effective quantitative extraction of the metabolites while avoiding their deterioration. Parameters such as the fecal sample weight to extraction solvent volume, the nature and the pH value of the extraction solvent, and the homogenization process are some important factors for the optimal extraction of samples, in order to obtain high-quality metabolic fingerprints, using either untargeted or targeted metabolomics.

Key words

Metabolomics Sample preparation Fecal samples Rats NMR GC-MS LC-MS/MS Fecal extract 

References

  1. 1.
    Guinane CM, Cotter PD (2013) Role of the gut microbiota in health and chronic gastrointestinal disease: understanding a hidden metabolic organ. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 6(4):295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holmes E, Li JV, Athanasiou T, Ashrafian H, Nicholson JK (2011) Understanding the role of gut microbiome-host metabolic signal disruption in health and disease. Trends Microbiol 19(7):349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deda O, Gika HG, Wilson ID, Theodoridis GA (2015) An overview of fecal sample preparation for global metabolic profiling. J Pharm Biomed Anal 113:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Theodoridis G, Gika H, Franceschi P et al (2012) LC-MS based global metabolite profiling of grapes: solvent extraction protocol optimisation. Metabolomics 8(2):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gika H, Theodoridis G (2011) Sample preparation prior to the LC-MS-based metabolomics/metabonomics of blood-derived samples. Bioanalysis 3(14):1647–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gika HG, Wilson ID, Theodoridis GA (2014) LC–MS-based holistic metabolic profiling. Problems, limitations, advantages, and future perspectives. J Chromatogr B 966:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bollard ME, Stanley EG, Lindon JC et al (2005) NMR-based metabonomic approaches for evaluating physiological influences on biofluid composition. NMR Biomed 18(3):143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deda O, Chatziioannou AC, Fasoula S et al (2017) Sample preparation optimization in fecal metabolic profiling. J Chromatogr B 1047:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI (2002) How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu Rev Nutr 22:283–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lamichhane S, Yde CC, Schmedes MS et al (2015) Strategy for nuclear-magnetic-resonance-based metabolomics of human feces. Anal Chem 87(12):5930–5937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu J, An Y, Yao J, Wang Y, Tang H (2010) An optimised sample preparation method for NMR-based faecal metabonomic analysis. Analyst 135(5):1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saric J, Wang Y, Li J et al (2008) Species variation in the fecal metabolome gives insight into differential gastrointestinal function. J Proteome Res 7(1):352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deda O, Gika H, Panagoulis T et al (2017) Impact of exercise on fecal and cecal metabolome over aging: a longitudinal study in rats. Bioanalysis 9(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bezabeh T, Somorjai RL, Smith IC (2009) ICP MR metabolomics of fecal extracts: applications in the study of bowel diseases. Magn Reson Chem 47(S1):S54–S61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monleon D, Garcia-Valles R, Morales JM et al (2014) Metabolomic analysis of long-term spontaneous exercise in mice suggests increased lipolysis and altered glucose metabolism when animals are at rest. J Appl Physiol 117(10):1110–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao X, Pujos-Guillot E, Martin J-F et al (2009) Metabolite analysis of human fecal water by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with ethyl chloroformate derivatization. Anal Biochem 393(2):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gao X, Pujos-Guillot E, Sébédio J-L (2010) Development of a quantitative metabolomic approach to study clinical human fecal water metabolome based on trimethylsilylation derivatization and GC/MS analysis. Anal Chem 82(15):6447–6456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Virgiliou C, Sampsonidis I, Gika HG, Raikos N, Theodoridis GA (2015) Development and validation of a HILIC-MS/MS multitargeted method for metabolomics applications. Electrophoresis 36(18):2215–2225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Deda
    • 1
  • Helen G. Gika
    • 2
  • Georgios A. Theodoridis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of MedicineAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations