Skip to main content

Adaptation of Laser Microdissection Technique to Nanostring RNA Analysis in the Study of a Spontaneous Metastatic Mammary Carcinoma Mouse Model

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Laser Capture Microdissection

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1723))

Abstract

The mouse model characterized by spontaneous lung metastasis from JygMC (A) cells closely resembles the human triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. The primary tumors morphologically present both epithelial and spindle-like cells, but metastases in lung parenchyma display only adenocarcinoma properties. In the study of molecular signatures, laser capture microdissection (LCM) on frozen tissue sections was used to separate the following regions of interest: the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET), carcinoma, lung metastases, normal mammary gland and normal lung parenchyma. NanoString was selected for the study of molecular signatures in LCM targets as a reliable downstream gene expression platform allowing analysis of tissue lysates without RNA extraction and amplification. This chapter provides detailed protocols for the collection of tissue, LCM sample preparation and dissection, production of lysates, extraction, and quality control of RNA for NanoString analysis, as well as the methodology of Nanostring gene expression profiling experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wulfkuhle JD, Speer R, Pierobon M et al (2008) Multiplexed cell signaling analysis of human breast cancer applications for personalized therapy. J Proteome Res 7:1508–1517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Melis M, Diaz G, Kleiner DE et al (2014) Viral expression and molecular profiling in liver tissue versus microdissected hepatocytes in hepatitis B virus–associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med 12:230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakazono M, Qiu F, Borsuk LA et al (2003) Laser–capture microdissection, a tool for the global analysis of gene expression in specific plant cell types: identification of genes expressed differentially in epidermal cells or vascular tissues of maize. Plant Cell 15:583–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Espina V, Wulfkuhle JD, Calvert VS et al (2006) Laser–capture microdissection. Nat Protoc 1:586–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma XJ, Dahiya S, Richardson EA et al (2009) Gene expression pro fi ling of tumor microenvironment during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 11:R7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emmert-Buck MR, Bonner RF, Smith PD et al (1996) Laser capture microdissection. Science 274:998–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erickson HS, Albert PS, Gillespie JW et al (2009) Quantitative RT–PCR gene expression analysis of laser microdissected tissue samples. Nat Protoc 4:902–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray GI (2007) An overview of laser microdissection technologies. Acta Histochem 109:171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldelli E, Haura EB, Crino L et al (2015) Impact of upfront cellular enrichment by laser capture microdissection on protein and phosphoprotein drug target signaling activation measurements in human lung cancer: Implications for personalized medicine. Proteomics Clin Appl 9(9–10):928–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacquet R, Hillyer J, Landis WJ (2005) Analysis of connective tissues by laser capture microdissection and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 337:22–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Golubeva Y, Rogers K (2009) Collection and preparation of rodent tissue samples for histopathological and molecular studies in carcinogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 511:3–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Castro NP, Fedorova-Abrams ND, Merchant AS et al (2015) Cripto-1 as a novel therapeutic target for triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 6:11910–11929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. NanoString Technologies (2009) NanoString technical note: sample flexibility for gene expression analysis with the nCounter™ analysis system; in v.20091113. NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geiss GK, Bumgarner RE, Birditt B et al (2008) Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs. Nat Biotechnol 26:317–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Castro NP, Merchant AS, Sayler K et al (2016) Adaptation of laser microdissection technique for the study of a spontaneous metastatic mammary carcinoma mouse model by nanostring technologies. PLoS One 11(4):e0153270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Imbeaud S, Graudens E, Boulanger V et al (2005) Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces. Nucleic Acids Res 33(6):e56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ross J (1995) mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Microbiol Rev 59:423–450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kabnick KS, Housman DE (1998) Determinants that contribute to cytoplasmic stability of human c–fos and beta–globin mRNAs are located at several sites in each RNA. Mol Cell Biol 8:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  19. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources CoLS, National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., p 125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Research was supported (in part) by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yelena G. Golubeva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Castro, N.P., Golubeva, Y.G. (2018). Adaptation of Laser Microdissection Technique to Nanostring RNA Analysis in the Study of a Spontaneous Metastatic Mammary Carcinoma Mouse Model. In: Murray, G. (eds) Laser Capture Microdissection. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1723. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7558-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7558-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7557-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7558-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics