Quorum Sensing pp 353-362 | Cite as

Identification of AI-2 Quorum Sensing Inhibitors in Vibrio harveyi Through Structure-Based Virtual Screening

  • Tianyu Jiang
  • Peng Zhu
  • Lupei Du
  • Minyong Li
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1673)


Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell-to-cell communication system that regulates gene expression as a result of the production and perception of signal molecules called autoinducers (AIs). AI-2 is a QS autoinducer produced by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, in which it regulates intraspecies and interspecies communication. The identification of QS inhibitors is considered a promising strategy for the development of anti-virulence drugs with reduced selective pressure for resistance. Here we describe a high-throughput virtual screening approach to identify AI-2 quorum sensing inhibitors on the basis of Vibrio harveyi LuxPQ crystal structure. Seven potent inhibitors with IC50 values in the micromolar range were selected with no effect or low effect on V. harveyi growth rate.

Key words

AI-2 Vibrio harveyi LuxPQ Quorum sensing inhibitors Virtual screening 



This project was funded by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (No. 2013CB734002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81370085 and 81001362), the Qilu Professorship at Shandong University, and the Taishan Scholarship Program at Shandong Province.


  1. 1.
    Atkinson S, Williams P (2009) Quorum sensing and social networking in the microbial world. J R Soc Interface 6:959–978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:165–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith JA, Wang J, Nguyen-Mau SM, Lee V, Sintim HO (2009) Biological screening of a diverse set of AI-2 analogues in Vibrio harveyi suggests that receptors which are involved in synergistic agonism of AI-2 and analogues are promiscuous. Chem Commun 7:7033–7035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Kievit TR, Iglewski BH (2000) Bacterial quorum sensing in pathogenic relationships. Infect Immun 68:4839–4849CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong YH, Wang LH, JL X, Zhang HB, Zhang XF, Zhang LH (2001) Quenching quorum-sensing-dependent bacterial infection by an N-acyl homoserine lactonase. Nature 411:813–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunlap PV (1999) Quorum regulation of luminescence in Vibrio fischeri. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 1:5–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB (1978) Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75:3479–3483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P (2005) Biofilm formation and dispersal and the transmission of human pathogens. Trends Microbiol 13:7–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsusaki H, Chinachoti N, Sonomoto K, Ishizaki A (1998) Purification, identification, and effective production of a peptide antibiotic produced by Lactococcus lactis IO-1 (JCM 7638). Ann N Y Acad Sci 864:422–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang T, Li M (2013) Quorum sensing inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 23:867–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bassler BL, Wright M, Silverman MR (1994) Multiple signalling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi: sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway. Mol Microbiol 13:273–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camilli A, Bassler BL (2006) Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science 311:1113–1116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eberhard A, Burlingame AL, Eberhard C, Kenyon GL, Nealson KH, Oppenheimer NJ (1981) Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Biochemistry 20:2444–2449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henke JM, Bassler BL (2004) Three parallel quorum-sensing systems regulate gene expression in Vibrio harveyi. J Bacteriol 186:6902–6914CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyon GJ, Wright JS, Christopoulos A, Novick RP, Muir TW (2002) Reversible and specific extracellular antagonism of receptor-histidine kinase signaling. J Biol Chem 277:6247–6253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pesci EC, Milbank JB, Pearson JP, McKnight S, Kende AS, Greenberg EP et al (1999) Quinolone signaling in the cell-to-cell communication system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11229–11234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sperandio V, Torres AG, Jarvis B, Nataro JP, Kaper JB (2003) Bacteria-host communication: the language of hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8951–8956CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowery CA, Mckenzie KM, Qi L, Meijler MM, Janda KD (2005) Quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi: probing the specificity of the LuxP binding site. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15:2395–2398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rickard AH, Palmer RJ Jr, Blehert DS, Campagna SR, Semmelhack MF, Egland PG et al (2006) Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth. Mol Microbiol 60:1446–1456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang S, Lopez CR, Zechiedrich EL (2006) Quorum sensing and multidrug transporters in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2386–2391CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu P, Li M (2012) Recent progresses on AI-2 bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 19:174–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen X, Schauder S, Potier N, Van Dorsselaer A, Pelczer I, Bassler BL et al (2002) Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 415:545–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neiditch MB, Federle MJ, Miller ST, Bassler BL, Hughson FM (2005) Regulation of LuxPQ receptor activity by the quorum-sensing signal autoinducer-2. Mol Cell 18:507–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neiditch MB, Federle MJ, Pompeani AJ, Kelly RC, Swem DL, Jeffrey PD et al (2006) Ligand-induced asymmetry in histidine sensor kinase complex regulates quorum sensing. Cell 126:1095–1108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stock AM (2006) Transmembrane signaling by asymmetry. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:861–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu P, Peng H, Ni N, Wang B, Li M (2012) Novel AI-2 quorum sensing inhibitors in Vibrio harveyi identified through structure-based virtual screening. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22:6413–6417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pearlman RS (1987) Rapid generation of high quality approximate 3D molecular structures. Chem Des Autom News 2:1–7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muegge I (2003) Selection criteria for drug-like compounds. Med Res Rev 23:302–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vilchez R, Lemme A, Thiel V, Schulz S, Sztajer H, Wagner-Döbler I (2007) Analysing traces of autoinducer-2 requires standardization of the Vibrio harveyi bioassay. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:489–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ewing TJA, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15:411–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moustakas DT, Lang PT, Pegg S, Pettersen E, Kuntz ID, Brooijmans N et al (2006) Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:601–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miller ST, Xavier KB, Campagna SR, Taga ME, Semmelhack MF, Bassler BL et al (2004) Salmonella typhimurium recognizes a chemically distinct form of the bacterial quorum-sensing signal AI-2. Mol Cell 15:677–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ni N, Choudhary G, Li M, Wang B (2009) A new phenothiazine structural scaffold as inhibitors of bacterial quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382:153–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang JM, Chen YF, Shen TW, Kristal BS, Hsu DF (2005) Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:1134–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Semmelhack MF, Campagna SR, Federle MJ, Bassler BL (2005) An expeditious synthesis of DPD and boron binding studies. Org Lett 7:569–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Natural Products (MOE), School of PharmacyShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations