Skip to main content

Determination of Enzymes Associated with Sulfite Toxicity in Plants: Kinetic Assays for SO, APR, SiR, and In-Gel SiR Activity

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Plant Stress Tolerance

Abstract

The amino acid cysteine plays a major role in plant response to abiotic stress by being the donor of elemental sulfur for the sulfuration of the molybdenum cofactor, otherwise the last step of ABA biosynthesis, the oxidation of abscisic aldehyde, is inactivated. Additionally, cysteine serves as a precursor for the biosynthesis of glutathione, the reactive oxygen species scavenger essential for redox status homeostasis during stress. Cysteine is generated by the sulfate reductive pathway where sulfite oxidase (SO; EC 1.8.3.1) is an important enzyme in the homeostasis of sulfite levels (present either as a toxic intermediate in the pathway or as a toxic air pollutant that has penetrated the plant tissue via the stomata). SO is localized to the peroxisomes and detoxifies excess sulfite by catalyzing its oxidation to sulfate. Here we show a kinetic assay that relies on fuchsin colorimetric detection of sulfite, a substrate of SO activity. This SO assay is highly specific, technically simple, and readily performed in any laboratory.

5′-adenylylsulfate (APS) reductase (APR, E.C. 1.8.4.9) enzyme regulates a crucial step of sulfate assimilation in plants, algae and some human pathogens. The enzyme is upregulated in response to oxidative stress induced by abiotic stresses, such as salinity and hydrogen peroxide, to generate sulfite an intermediate for cysteine generation essential for the biosynthesis of glutathione, the hydrogen peroxide scavenger. Here we present two robust, sensitive, and simple colorimetric methods of APR activity based on sulfite determination by fuchsin.

Sulfite reductase (SiR) is one of the key enzymes in the primary sulfur assimilation pathway. It has been shown that SiR is an important plant enzyme for protection plant against sulfite toxicity and premature senescence. Here we describe two methods for SiR activity determination: a kinetic assay using desalted extract and an in-gel assay using crude extract.

Due to the energetically favorable equilibrium, sulfurtransferase (ST) activity measured as sulfite generation or consumption. Sulfite-generating ST activity is determined by colorimetric detection of SCN formation at 460 nm as the red Fe(SCN)3 complex from cyanide and thiosulfate using acidic iron reagent. Sulfite-consuming (MST) activity is detected as sulfite disappearance in the presence of thiocyanate (SCN) or as SCN disappearance. To abrogate interfering SO activity, total ST activities is detected by inhibiting SO activity with tungstate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marschner H (2005) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academeic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saito K (2000) Regulation of sulfate transport and synthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:188–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewandowska M, Sirko A (2008) Recent advances in understanding plant response to sulfur-deficiency stress. Acta Biochim Pol 55(3):457–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rausch T, Wachter A (2005) Sulfur metabolism: a versatile platform for launching defence operations. Trends Plant Sci 10(10):503–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muttucumaru N, Halford NG, Elmore JS, Dodson AT, Parry M, Shewry PR, Mottram DS (2006) Formation of high levels of acrylamide during the processing of flour derived from sulfate-deprived wheat. J Agric Food Chem 54(23):8951–8955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leustek T, Martin MN, Bick JA, Davies JP (2000) Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Ann Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol 51:141–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray F (1997) Urban air pollution and health effects. In: Brune D, Chapman DV, Gwynne MD, Pacyna JM (eds) The global environment: science, technology and management. Scandinavian Science Publisher, Weinheim, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herschbach C, Rennenberg H (2001) Significance of phloem-translocated organic sulfur compounds for the regulation of sulfur nutrition. Prog Bot 62:177–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Kooij TAW, De Kok LJ, Haneklaus S, Schnug E Uptake and metabolism of sulfur dioxide by Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 135:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noji M, Saito M, Nakamura M, Aono M, Saji H, Saito K (2001) Cysteine synthase overexpression in tobacco confers tolerance to sulfur-containing environmental pollutants. Plant Physiol 126:973–980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Legge AH, Krupa SV (2002) Effects of sulphur dioxide. In: Bell JNB, Treshow M (eds) Air pollution and plant life, 2nd edn. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matityahu I, Kachan L, Ilan IB, Amir R (2006) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the Met25 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibit enhanced levels of cysteine and glutathione and increased tolerance to oxidative stress. Amino Acids 30:185–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brychkova G, Xia Z, Yang G, Yesbergenova Z, Zhang Z, Davydov O, Fluhr R, Sagi M (2007) Sulfite oxidase protects plants against sulfur dioxide toxicity. Plant J 50:696–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanda S, Leustek T, Theisen MJ, Garavito RM, Benning C (2001) Recombinant Arabidopsis SQD1 converts UDP-glucose and sulfite to the sulfolipid head group precursor UDP-sulfoquinovose in vitro. J Biol Chem 276:3941–3946

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eilers T, Schwarz G, Brinkmann H, Witt C, Richter T, Nieder J, Koch B, Hille R, Hänsch R, Mendel RR (2001) Identification and biochemical characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana sulfite oxidase: a new player in plant sulfur metabolism. J Biol Chem 276:46989–46994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kopriva S (2006) Regulation of sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis and beyond. Ann Bot 97:479–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Papenbrock J, Schmidt A (2000) Characterization of two sulfurtransferase isozymes from Arabidopsis thaliana. Eur J Biochem 267:5571–5579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsakraklides G, Martin M, Chalam R, Tarczynski MC, Schmidt A, Leustek T (2002) Sulfate reduction is increased in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana expressing 5′-adenylylsulfate reductase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Plant J 32:879–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brychkova G, Yarmolinsky D, Sagi M (2012) Kinetic assays for determining in vitro APS reductase activity in plants without the use of radioactive substances. Plant Cell Physiol 53(9):1648–1658

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brychkova G, Yarmolinsky D, Ventura Y, Sagi M (2012) A novel in-gel assay and an improved kinetic assay for determining in vitro sulfite reductase activity in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 53(8):1507–1516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Sagi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Brychkova, G. et al. (2017). Determination of Enzymes Associated with Sulfite Toxicity in Plants: Kinetic Assays for SO, APR, SiR, and In-Gel SiR Activity. In: Sunkar, R. (eds) Plant Stress Tolerance. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1631. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7136-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7136-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7134-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7136-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics