Advertisement

Zymography pp 287-293 | Cite as

CTAB Zymography for the Analysis of Aspartic Proteases from Marine Sponges

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1626)

Abstract

Electrophoresis under denaturing conditions in the presence of SDS is a standard method for the protein and enzyme scientist. Nevertheless, there are special situations where this method may originate nonoptimal results. SDS may cause protein aggregation or precipitation. Beyond this, depending on the type of protein, some just do not resolve well or migrate abnormally in SDS gels. SDS, an anionic detergent, may be however substituted by a cationic detergent, like CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide), in order to solubilize and electrophorize proteins. CTAB electrophoresis allows the separation of proteins based on molecular weight and can be carried out at neutral or acidic pH. Here, we describe the development of a CTAB zymography method to analyze aspartic proteases from marine sponges, which present an abnormal high R f value when run in SDS-PAGE. The special feature of using CTAB is that it binds proteins, making them positively charged and thus migrating in the opposite direction compared to SDS-PAGE.

Key words

Aspartic proteases CTAB Cationic zymography Electrophoresis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge partial funding from the Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico de la Universidad de Carabobo (CDCH-2014). We kindly thank the donation of CTAB from Prof. Dr. C. Cabrele, University of Salzburg, Austria. Sponge samples were kindly provided by Prof. J.G. Rodríguez, Biology Department, FACYT, University of Carabobo.

References

  1. 1.
    Brik A, Wong CH (2003) HIV-1 protease: mechanism and drug discovery. Org Biomol Chem 1:5–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilkesman J, Schröder HC (2002) Heat-stable protease from the marine sponge Geodia cydonium. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand) 48:379–383Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buxbaum E (2012) Cationic electrophoresis. Methods Mol Biol 869:55–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Janson JC (2011) Protein purification: principles, high resolution methods, and applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garfin DE (2003) Gel electrophoresis of proteins. In: Davey J, Lord M (eds) Essential cell biology, vol 1: Cell structure, a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 197–268Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eley MH, Burns P, Kannapell CC, Campbell P (1979) Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide polycrylamide gel electrophoresis: estimation of protein subunit molecular weights using cationic detegents. Anal Biochem 92:411–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akin DT, Shapira R, Kinkade JM Jr (1985) The determination of molecular weights of biologically active proteins by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal Biochem 145:170–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hartinger J, Stenius K, Högemann D, Jahn R (1996) 16-BAC/SDS-PAGE: a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis system suitable for the separation of integral membrane proteins. Anal Biochem 240:126–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Macfarlane DE (1989) Two dimensional benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammonium chloride-sodium dodecyl sulfate preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: a high capacity high resolution technique for the purification of proteins from complex mixtures. Anal Biochem 176:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nothwang HG, Schindler J (2009) Two-dimensional separation of membrane proteins by 16-BAC-SDS-PAGE. Methods Mol Biol 528:269–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kramer ML (2006) A new multiphasic buffer system for benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammonium chloride polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of proteins providing efficient stacking. Electrophoresis 27:347–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braun R, Kinkl N, Beer M, Ueffing M (2007) Two-dimensional electrophoresis of membrane proteins. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1033–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snoek-van Beurden PA, Von den Hoff JW (2005) Zymographic techniques for the analysis of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Biotechniques 38:73–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bradford MB (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of micrograms quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi Q, Jackowski G (1998) One-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In: Hames BD (ed) Gel electrophoresis of proteins: a practical approach, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–52Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Díaz-López M, Moyano-López FJ, Alarcón-López FJ, García-Carreño FL, Navarrete del Toro MA (1998) Characterization of fish acid proteases by substrate-gel electrophoresis. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 121:369–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Environmental, Biology and Chemistry Research, Facultad de Ciencias y TecnologíaUniversidad de CaraboboValenciaVenezuela

Personalised recommendations