Advertisement

Comprehensive Analysis of Immunological Synapse Phenotypes Using Supported Lipid Bilayers

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1584)

Abstract

Supported lipid bilayers (SLB) formed on glass substrates have been a useful tool for study of immune cell signaling since the early 1980s. The mobility of lipid-anchored proteins in the system, first described for antibodies binding to synthetic phospholipid head groups, allows for the measurement of two-dimensional binding reactions and signaling processes in a single imaging plane over time or for fixed samples. The fragility of SLB and the challenges of building and validating individual substrates limit most experimenters to ~10 samples per day, perhaps increasing this few-fold when examining fixed samples. Successful experiments might then require further days to fully analyze. We present methods for automation of many steps in SLB formation, imaging in 96-well glass bottom plates, and analysis that enables >100-fold increase in throughput for fixed samples and wide-field fluorescence. This increased throughput will allow better coverage of relevant parameters and more comprehensive analysis of aspects of the immunological synapse that are well reconstituted by SLB.

Key words

Immunological synapse Supported lipid bilayers High-throughput screening Image analysis Costimulation Signaling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. Santos and S. Davis for sharing methods for protein production using the lentiviral system. Wellcome Trust grant 100262/Z/12/Z and the Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research supported this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Zinkernagel RM, Doherty PC (1974) Immunological surveillance against altered self components by sensitised T lymphocytes in lymphocytic choriomeningitis. Nature 251(5475):547–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poo WJ, Conrad L, Janeway CA Jr (1988) Receptor-directed focusing of lymphokine release by helper T cells. Nature 332(6162):378–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norcross MA (1984) A synaptic basis for T-lymphocyte activation. Ann Immunol (Paris) 135D(2):113–134Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul WE, Seder RA (1994) Lymphocyte responses and cytokines. Cell 76:241–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dustin ML, Olszowy MW, Holdorf AD, Li J, Bromley S, Desai N, Widder P, Rosenberger F, van der Merwe PA, Allen PM, Shaw AS (1998) A novel adapter protein orchestrates receptor patterning and cytoskeletal polarity in T cell contacts. Cell 94:667–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dustin ML, Colman DR (2002) Neural and immunological synaptic relations. Science 298(5594):785–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geiger B, Rosen D, Berke G (1982) Spatial relationships of microtubule-organizing centers and the contact area of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and target cells. J Cell Biol 95(1):137–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpen O, Virtanen I, Saksela E (1982) Ultrastructure of human natural killer cells: nature of the cytolytic contacts in relation to cellular secretion. J Immunol 128(6):2691–2697PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt RE, Caulfield JP, Michon J, Hein A, Kamada MM, MacDermott RP, Stevens RL, Ritz J (1988) T11/CD2 activation of cloned human natural killer cells results in increased conjugate formation and exocytosis of cytolytic granules. J Immunol 140(3):991–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kupfer A, Singer SJ (1989) Cell biology of cytotoxic and helper T cell functions: immunofluorescence microscopic studies of single cells and cell couples. Annu Rev Immunol 7:309–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stinchcombe JC, Bossi G, Booth S, Griffiths GM (2001) The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity 15(5):751–761CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Batista FD, Iber D, Neuberger MS (2001) B cells acquire antigen from target cells after synapse formation. Nature 411(6836):489–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll-Portillo A, Spendier K, Pfeiffer J, Griffiths G, Li H, Lidke KA, Oliver JM, Lidke DS, Thomas JL, Wilson BS, Timlin JA (2010) Formation of a mast cell synapse: Fc epsilon RI membrane dynamics upon binding mobile or immobilized ligands on surfaces. J Immunol 184(3):1328–1338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodridge HS, Reyes CN, Becker CA, Katsumoto TR, Ma J, Wolf AJ, Bose N, Chan AS, Magee AS, Danielson ME, Weiss A, Vasilakos JP, Underhill DM (2011) Activation of the innate immune receptor Dectin-1 upon formation of a ‘phagocytic synapse’. Nature 472(7344):471–475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A (1998) Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395(6697):82–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monks CR, Kupfer H, Tamir I, Barlow A, Kupfer A (1997) Selective modulation of protein kinase C-theta during T-cell activation. Nature 385(6611):83–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, Davis MM, Shaw AS, Allen PM, Dustin ML (1999) The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285(5425):221–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yokosuka T, Kobayashi W, Sakata-Sogawa K, Takamatsu M, Hashimoto-Tane A, Dustin ML, Tokunaga M, Saito T (2008) Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. Immunity 29(4):589–601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tseng SY, Waite JC, Liu M, Vardhana S, Dustin ML (2008) T cell-dendritic cell immunological synapses contain TCR-dependent CD28-CD80 clusters that recruit protein kinase Ctheta. J Immunol 181(7):4852–4863CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML (2005) Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 202(8):1031–1036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yokosuka T, Sakata-Sogawa K, Kobayashi W, Hiroshima M, Hashimoto-Tane A, Tokunaga M, Dustin ML, Saito T (2005) Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 6:1253–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varma R, Campi G, Yokosuka T, Saito T, Dustin ML (2006) T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 25(1):117–127CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bunnell SC, Hong DI, Kardon JR, Yamazaki T, McGlade CJ, Barr VA, Samelson LE (2002) T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol 158(7):1263–1275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Alwan MM, Rowden G, Lee TD, West KA (2001) The dendritic cell cytoskeleton is critical for the formation of the immunological synapse. J Immunol 166(3):1452–1456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Al-Alwan MM, Rowden G, Lee TD, West KA (2001) Fascin is involved in the antigen presentation activity of mature dendritic cells. J Immunol 166(1):338–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Comrie WA, Li S, Boyle S, Burkhardt JK (2015) The dendritic cell cytoskeleton promotes T cell adhesion and activation by constraining ICAM-1 mobility. J Cell Biol 208(4):457–473CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Natkanski E, Lee WY, Mistry B, Casal A, Molloy JE, Tolar P (2013) B cells use mechanical energy to discriminate antigen affinities. Science 340(6140):1587–1590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumari S, Depoil D, Martinelli R, Judokusumo E, Carmona G, Gertler FB, Kam LC, Carman CV, Burkhardt JK, Irvine DJ, Dustin ML (2015) Actin foci facilitate activation of the phospholipase C-gamma in primary T lymphocytes via the WASP pathway. eLife 4.  10.7554/eLife.04953
  29. 29.
    Kumari S, Vardhana S, Cammer M, Curado S, Santos L, Sheetz MP, Dustin ML (2012) T Lymphocyte myosin IIA is required for maturation of the immunological synapse. Front Immunol 3:230. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00230 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nair PM, Ngu H, Torres E, Marsters S, Lawrence DA, Stephan JP, Komuves L, Ashkenazi A (2015) Membrane display and functional analysis of juxtacrine ligand-receptor signaling. Biotechniques 59(4):231–238 240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mayya V, Neiswanger W, Medina R, Wiggins CH, Dustin ML (2015) Integrative analysis of T cell motility from multi-channel microscopy data using TIAM. J Immunol Methods 416:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.11.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goktug AN, Chai SC, Chen T (2013) Data analysis approaches in high throughput screening. In: El-Shemy HA (ed) Drug discovery. InTech, 2013. Rijeka, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hu J, Gondarenko AA, Dang AP, Bashour KT, O’Connor RS, Lee S, Liapis A, Ghassemi S, Milone MC, Sheetz MP, Dustin ML, Kam LC, Hone JC (2016) High-throughput mechanobiology screening platform using micro- and nanotopography. Nano Lett. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04364 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Torres AJ, Contento RL, Gordo S, Wucherpfennig KW, Love JC (2013) Functional single-cell analysis of T-cell activation by supported lipid bilayer-tethered ligands on arrays of nanowells. Lab Chip 13(1):90–99. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40869d CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johnston SC, Dustin ML, Hibbs ML, Springer TA (1990) On the species specificity of the interaction of LFA-1 with intercellular adhesion molecules. J Immunol 145(4):1181–1187PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesThe University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Target Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of MedicineThe University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations