Abstract
In this chapter, commonly used methods to assess the genome-wide DNA methylation status are reviewed and compared. The methods described in this chapter include enrichment-based method, Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), paired with microarray technology and next generation sequencing, and sodium bisulfate-based techniques including Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (Illumina 450 K) and Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS).
An overview of each protocol, including description as to why particular steps are required or critical, is outlined. Further, the protocols are compared and advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C et al (2011) High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 98:288–295
Gold M, Gefter M, Hausmann R, Hurwitz J (1966) Methylation of DNA. J Gen Physiol 49:5–28
Razin A, Riggs AD (1980) DNA methylation and gene function. Science 210:604–610
Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R (1992) Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69:915–926
Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99:247–257
Comb M, Goodman HM (1990) CpG methylation inhibits proenkephalin gene expression and binding of the transcription factor AP-2. Nucleic Acids Res 18:3975–3982
Lewis JD, Meehan RR, Henzel WJ et al (1992) Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell 69:905–914
Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wade PA et al (1998) Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet 19:187–191
Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA et al (1998) Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393:386–389
Yang X, Han H, De Carvalho DD, Lay FD, Jones PA, Liang G (2014) Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Cell 26:577–590
Jjingo D, Conley AB, Yi SV, Lunyak VV, Jordan IK (2012) On the presence and role of human gene-body DNA methylation. Oncotarget 3:462–474
Schultz MD, He Y, Whitaker JW et al (2015) Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature 523:212–216
Zhao M, Liu S, Luo S et al (2014) DNA methylation and mRNA and microRNA expression of SLE CD4+ T cells correlate with disease phenotype. J Autoimmun 54:127–136
Karpurapu M, Ranjan R, Deng J et al (2014) Krüppel like factor 4 promoter undergoes active demethylation during monocyte/macrophage differentiation. PLoS One 9, e93362
Zhao M, Wang Z, Yung S, Lu Q (2015) Epigenetic dynamics in immunity and autoimmunity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 67:65–74
Lardenoije R, Iatrou A, Kenis G et al (2015) The epigenetics of aging and neurodegeneration. Prog Neurobiol 131:21–64
Landgrave-Gómez J, Mercado-Gómez O, Guevara-Guzmán R (2015) Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases. Front Cell Neurosci 9:58
Paska AV, Hudler P (2015) Aberrant methylation patterns in cancer: a clinical view. Biochem Medica 25:161–176
Chiang N-J, Shan Y-S, Hung W-C, Chen L-T (2015) Epigenetic regulation in the carcinogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 67:110–114
Sui X, Zhu J, Zhou J et al (2015) Epigenetic modifications as regulatory elements of autophagy in cancer. Cancer Lett 360:106–113
Bock C, Tomazou EM, Brinkman AB et al (2010) Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologies. Nat Biotechnol 28:1106–1114
Laird PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11:191–203
Beck S, Rakyan VK (2008) The methylome: approaches for global DNA methylation profiling. Trends Genet 24:231–237
Weber M, Davies JJ, Wittig D et al (2005) Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat Genet 37:853–862
Lisanti S, von Zglinicki T, Mathers JC (2012) Standardization and quality controls for the methylated DNA immunoprecipitation technique. Epigenetics 7:615–625
Borgel J, Guibert S, Weber M (2012) Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) from low amounts of cells. Methods Mol Biol 925:149–158
Zhao M-T, Whyte JJ, Hopkins GM, Kirk MD, Prather RS (2014) Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (MeDIP-seq) using low amounts of genomic DNA. Cell Reprogram 16:175–184
Harris RA, Wang T, Coarfa C et al (2010) Comparison of sequencing-based methods to profile DNA methylation and identification of monoallelic epigenetic modifications. Nat Biotechnol 28:1097–1105
Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ et al (2008) A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nat Biotechnol 26:779–785
Pelizzola M, Koga Y, Urban AE et al (2008) MEDME: an experimental and analytical methodology for the estimation of DNA methylation levels based on microarray derived MeDIP-enrichment. Genome Res 18:1652–1659
Stevens M, Cheng JB, Li D et al (2013) Estimating absolute methylation levels at single-CpG resolution from methylation enrichment and restriction enzyme sequencing methods. Genome Res 23:1541–1553
Otto C, Reiche K, Hackermuller J (2012) Detection of differentially expressed segments in tiling array data. Bioinformatics 28:1471–1479
Sorek R, Cossart P (2010) Prokaryotic transcriptomics: a new view on regulation, physiology and pathogenicity. Nat Rev Genet 11:9–16
Jia J, Pekowska A, Jaeger S, Benoukraf T, Ferrier P, Spicuglia S (2010) Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using in vitro methylated genomic DNA. BMC Res Notes 3:240
Clark C, Palta P, Joyce CJ et al (2012) A comparison of the whole genome approach of MeDIP-seq to the targeted approach of the Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip(®) for methylome profiling. PLoS One 7:e50233
Meissner A (2005) Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 33:5868–5877
Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS et al (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1827–1831
Grunau C, Clark SJ, Rosenthal A (2001) Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters. Nucleic Acids Res 29:E65–E65
Guo F, Yan L, Guo H et al (2015) The transcriptome and DNA methylome landscapes of human primordial germ cells. Cell 161:1437–1452
Boyle P, Clement K, Gu H et al (2012) Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol 13:R92
Gu H, Bock C, Mikkelsen TS et al (2010) Genome-scale DNA methylation mapping of clinical samples at single-nucleotide resolution. Nat Methods 7:133–136
Smith ZD, Gu H, Bock C, Gnirke A, Meissner A (2009) High-throughput bisulfite sequencing in mammalian genomes. Methods 48:226–232
Liang F, Tang B, Wang Y et al (2014) WBSA: web service for bisulfite sequencing data analysis. PLoS One 9:e86707
Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Wen B et al (2009) The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat Genet 41:178–186
Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M et al (2010) Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 466:253–257
Roessler J, Ammerpohl O, Gutwein J et al (2012) Quantitative cross-validation and content analysis of the 450k DNA methylation array from Illumina Inc. BMC Res Notes 5:210
Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S et al (2011) Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics 6:692–702
Harper KN, Peters BA, Gamble MV (2013) Batch effects and pathway analysis: two potential perils in cancer studies involving DNA methylation array analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22:1052–1060
Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Calonne E, Denis H, Sotiriou C, Fuks F (2011) Evaluation of the infinium methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics 3:771–784
Touleimat N, Tost J (2012) Complete pipeline for Infinium(®) Human Methylation 450K BeadChip data processing using subset quantile normalization for accurate DNA methylation estimation. Epigenomics 4:325–341
Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H et al (2014) Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30:1363–1369
Maksimovic J, Gordon L, Oshlack A (2012) SWAN: Subset-quantile within array normalization for illumina infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips. Genome Biol 13:R44
Teschendorff AE, Marabita F, Lechner M et al (2013) A beta-mixture quantile normalization method for correcting probe design bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics 29:189–196
Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A et al (2014) ChAMP: 450k chip analysis methylation pipeline. Bioinformatics 30:428–430
Pidsley R, Y Wong CC, Volta M, Lunnon K, Mill J, Schalkwyk LC (2013) A data-driven approach to preprocessing Illumina 450K methylation array data. BMC Genomics 14:293
Triche TJ, Weisenberger DJ, Van Den Berg D, Laird PW, Siegmund KD (2013) Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e90
Du P, Zhang X, Huang C-C et al (2010) Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11:587
Bibikova M, Fan J-B (2009) GoldenGate assay for DNA methylation profiling. Methods Mol Biol 507:149–163
Bibikova M, Lin Z, Zhou L et al (2006) High-throughput DNA methylation profiling using universal bead arrays. Genome Res 16:383–393
Sean Davis, Pan Du, Sven Bilke, Tim Triche, Jr. MB. methylumi: Handle Illumina methylation data. 2015: R package version 2.14.0
Zhuang J, Widschwendter M, Teschendorff AE (2012) A comparison of feature selection and classification methods in DNA methylation studies using the Illumina Infinium platform. BMC Bioinformatics 13:59
Du P, Kibbe WA, Lin SM (2008) lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics 24:1547–1548
Wang D, Yan L, Hu Q et al (2012) IMA: an R package for high-throughput analysis of Illumina’s 450K Infinium methylation data. Bioinformatics 28:729–730
Aryee KDHMJ. minfi: Analyze Illumina’s 450 K methylation arrays. 2013: R package version 1.2.0. 2012
Butcher LM, Beck S (2015) Probe Lasso: a novel method to rope in differentially methylated regions with 450K DNA methylation data. Methods 72:21–28
Chen Y, Lemire M, Choufani S et al (2013) Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics8:203–209
Acknowledgments
S.P. is supported by the Mats Sundin Fellowship in Developmental Health. D. C. is supported by fellowship from the Israel Cancer Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Petropoulos, S., Cheishvili, D., Szyf, M. (2017). High-Throughput Techniques for DNA Methylation Profiling. In: Stefanska, B., MacEwan, D. (eds) Epigenetics and Gene Expression in Cancer, Inflammatory and Immune Diseases. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6743-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6743-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6741-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6743-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols