Abstract
While advanced neuroimaging methods such as fMRI provide a reliable way to determine individual lateralization of function, these methods are costly and not readily available to every scientist interested in investigating functional hemispheric asymmetries in humans. Behavioral methods of testing humans provide cheaper and easily administered alternatives to fMRI scans and are still widely used in lateralization research today. In the following chapter, two key methods will be reviewed: divided visual field paradigms based on tachistoscopic viewing and the dichotic listening task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baxendale S (2009) The Wada test. Curr Opin Neurol 22:185–189
Davidson RJ (1988) EEG measures of cerebral asymmetry: conceptual and methodological issues. Int J Neurosci 39:71–89
Rossion B, Dricot L, Devolder A, Bodart JM, Crommelinck M, De Gelder B, Zoontjes R (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 12:793–802
Westerhausen R, Kompus K, Hugdahl K (2014) Mapping hemispheric symmetries, relative asymmetries, and absolute asymmetries underlying the auditory laterality effect. Neuroimage 84:962–970
Volkmann AW (1859) Das Tachistoskop. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Mathematisch-Physische Classe 11:90–98
Poffenberger A (1912) Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nervous centers. Arch Psychol 23:1–73
Gazzaniga MS, Bogen JE, Sperry RW (1962) Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 48:1765–1769
Hausmann M, Güntürkün O (2000) Steroid fluctuations modify functional cerebral asymmetries: the hypothesis of progesterone-mediated interhemispheric decoupling. Neuropsychologia 38:1362–1374
Gazzaniga MS (2005) Forty-five years of split-brain research and still going strong. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:653–659
Bourne VJ (2006) The divided visual field paradigm: methodological considerations. Laterality 11:373–393
Van der Haegen L, Cai Q, Seurinck R, Brysbaert M (2011) Further fMRI validation of the visual half field technique as an indicator of language laterality: a large-group analysis. Neuropsychologia 49:2879–2888
Godnig EC (2003) The tachistoscope: its history and uses. J Behav Optom 14:39–42
Correia S (2011) Tachistoscopic presentation. In: Kreutzer J, DeLuca J, Caplan B (eds) Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 2461–2463
Benschop R (1998) What is a tachistoscope? Historical explorations of an instrument. Sci Context 11:23–50
Bryden PJ, Brown SG, Roy EA (2011) Can an observational method of assessing hand preference be used to predict language lateralisation? Laterality 16:707–721
Godard O, Fiori N (2012) Sex and hemispheric differences in facial invariants extraction. Laterality 17:202–216
Kavé G, Gavrieli R, Mashal N (2014) Stronger left-hemisphere lateralization in older versus younger adults while processing conventional metaphors. Laterality 19:705–717
Lam M, Collinson SL, Sim K, Mackay CE, James AC, Crow TJ (2012) Asymmetry of lexico-semantic processing in schizophrenia changes with disease progression. Schizophr Res 134:125–130
Elze T, Tanner TG (2012) Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments. PLoS One 7:e44048
Ghodrati M, Morris AP, Price NS (2015) The (un)suitability of modern liquid crystal displays (LCDs) for vision research. Front Psychol 6:303
Plant RR, Hammond N, Whitehouse T (2003) How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 35:276–284
Ocklenburg S, Arning L, Gerding WM, Epplen JT, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2013) FOXP2 variation modulates functional hemispheric asymmetries for speech perception. Brain Lang 126:279–284
Selpien H, Siebert C, Genc E, Beste C, Faustmann PM, Güntürkün O, Ocklenburg S (2015) Left dominance for language perception starts in the extrastriate cortex: an ERP and sLORETA study. Behav Brain Res 291:325–333
Walsh A, McDowall J, Grimshaw GM (2010) Hemispheric specialization for emotional word processing is a function of SSRI responsiveness. Brain Cogn 74:332–340
Jordan TR, Patching GR, Milner AD (1998) Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: implications for studying cerebral asymmetry. Q J Exp Psychol A 51:371–391
Bourne VJ, Hole GJ (2006) Lateralized repetition priming for familiar faces: evidence for asymmetric interhemispheric cooperation. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59:1117–1133
Marzi CA, Berlucchi G (1977) Right visual field superiority for accuracy of recognition of famous faces in normals. Neuropsychologia 15:751–756
Meyer AM, Federmeier KD (2008) The divided visual world paradigm: eye tracking reveals hemispheric asymmetries in lexical ambiguity resolution. Brain Res 1222:166–183
Lange JJ, Wijers AA, Mulder LJ, Mulder G (1999) ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays. Biol Psychol 50:203–233
Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D (2001) Types of eye movements and their functions. In: Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, LaMantia AS, McNamara JO, & Williams SM (eds.) Neuroscience, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Lindell AK, Nicholls ME (2003) Cortical representation of the fovea: implications for visual half-field research. Cortex 39:111–117
Saban-Bezalel R, Mashal N (2015) Hemispheric processing of idioms and irony in adults with and without pervasive developmental disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 45(11):3496–3508
Falkenberg HK, Rubin GS, Bex PJ (2007) Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability. Vision Res 47:126–135
Prete G, Laeng B, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L (2015) Right hemisphere or valence hypothesis, or both? The processing of hybrid faces in the intact and callosotomized brain. Neuropsychologia 68:94–106
Ellis AW (2004) Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation. Brain Lang 88:355–366
Gold R, Faust M, Ben-Artzi E (2012) Metaphors and verbal creativity: the role of the right hemisphere. Laterality 17:602–614
Tressoldi PE (1987) Visual hemispace differences reflect hemisphere asymmetries. Neuropsychologia 25:625–636
Verosky SC, Turk-Browne NB (2012) Representations of facial identity in the left hemisphere require right hemisphere processing. J Cogn Neurosci 24:1006–1017
Beaton AA, Fouquet NC, Maycock NC, Platt E, Payne LS, Derrett A (2012) Processing emotion from the eyes: a divided visual field and ERP study. Laterality 17:486–514
Jończyk R (2015) Hemispheric asymmetry of emotion words in a non-native mind: a divided visual field study. Laterality 20:326–347
Holtgraves T, Felton A (2011) Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of negative and positive words: a divided field study. Cogn Emot 25:691–699
Mashal N, Itkes O (2014) The effects of emotional valence on hemispheric processing of metaphoric word pairs. Laterality 19:511–521
Jones B, Anuza T (1982) Effects of sex, handedness, stimulus and visual field on “mental rotation”. Cortex 18:501–514
Michałowski B, Króliczak G (2015) Sinistrals are rarely “right”: evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms. Front Hum Neurosci 9:166
Leuthold H (2011) The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: a short review. Acta Psychol (Amst) 136:203–211
Ocklenburg S, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2011) Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes. Neuroimage 55:1771–1778
Leehey S, Carey S, Diamond R, Cahn A (1978) Upright and inverted faces: the right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex 14:411–419
Brysbaert M, d'Ydewalle G (1990) Tachistoscopic presentation of verbal stimuli for assessing cerebral dominance: reliability data and some practical recommendations. Neuropsychologia 28:443–455
Voyer D (1998) On the reliability and validity of noninvasive laterality measures. Brain Cogn 36:209–236
Hunter ZR, Brysbaert M (2008) Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 46:316–325
Bruyer R, Brysbaert M (2011) Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: is the Inverse Efficiency Score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean Reaction Time (RT) and the Percentage of Errors (PE)? Psychol Belg 51:5–13
Ocklenburg S, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2012) Hemispheric asymmetries and cognitive flexibility: an ERP and sLORETA study. Brain Cogn 78:148–155
Ocklenburg S, Ness V, Güntürkün O, Suchan B, Beste C (2013) Response inhibition is modulated by functional cerebral asymmetries for facial expression perception. Front Psychol 4:879
Smith ER, Chenery HJ, Angwin AJ, Copland DA (2009) Hemispheric contributions to semantic activation: a divided visual field and event-related potential investigation of time-course. Brain Res 1284:125–144
Küper K, Zimmer HD (2015) ERP evidence for hemispheric asymmetries in exemplar-specific explicit memory access. Brain Res 1625:73–83
Anders S, Lotze M, Wildgruber D, Erb M, Grodd W, Birbaumer N (2005) Processing of a simple aversive conditioned stimulus in a divided visual field paradigm: an fMRI study. Exp Brain Res 162:213–219
Sung YW, Someya Y, Eriko Y, Choi SH, Cho ZH, Ogawa S (2011) Involvement of low-level visual areas in hemispheric superiority for face processing. Brain Res 1390:118–125
Motz BA, James KH, Busey TA (2012) The Lateralizer: a tool for students to explore the divided brain. Adv Physiol Educ 36:220–225
Hopkins WD (1997) Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Neuropsychologia 35:343–348
Van Kleeck MH (1989) Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia 27:1165–1178
Dépy D, Fagot J, Vauclair J (1998) Comparative assessment of distance processing and hemispheric specialization in humans and baboons (Papio papio). Brain Cogn 38:165–182
Hugdahl K (2011) Fifty years of dichotic listening research—still going and going and …. Brain Cogn 76:211–213
Kimura D (1961) Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol 15:156–165
Kimura D (1961) Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol 15:166–170
Shankweiler D, Studdert-Kennedy M (1967) Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears. Q J Exp Psychol 19:59–63
Studdert-Kennedy M, Shankweiler D (1970) Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 48:579–694
Bryden MP, Munhall K, Allard F (1983) Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain Lang 18:236–248
Hugdahl K, Andersson L (1986) The “forced-attention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: a comparison between adults and children. Cortex 22:417–432
Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Uvebrant P, Lundervold AJ (1997) Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. Arch Neurol 54:1494–1500
Sommer I, Ramsey N, Kahn R, Aleman A, Bouma A (2001) Handedness, language lateralisation and anatomical asymmetry in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 178:344–351
Westerhausen R, Hugdahl K (2008) The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: a review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1044–1054
Kompus K, Specht K, Ersland L, Juvodden HT, van Wageningen H, Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R (2012) A forced-attention dichotic listening fMRI study on 113 subjects. Brain Lang 121:240–247
Bless JJ, Westerhausen R, Arciuli J, Kompus K, Gudmundsen M, Hugdahl K (2013) “Right on all Occasions?”—On the feasibility of laterality research using a smartphone dichotic listening application. Front Psychol 4:42
Bless JJ, Westerhausen R, von Koss Torkildsen J, Gudmundsen M, Kompus K, Hugdahl K (2015) Laterality across languages: results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality 20:434–452
Hirnstein M, Westerhausen R, Korsnes MS, Hugdahl K (2013) Sex differences in language asymmetry are age-dependent and small: a large-scale, consonant-vowel dichotic listening study with behavioral and fMRI data. Cortex 49:1910–1921
Westerhausen R, Bless J, Kompus K (2015) Behavioral laterality and aging: the free-recall dichotic-listening right-ear advantage increases with age. Dev Neuropsychol 40:313–327
Broadbent DE (1954) The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J Exp Psychol 47:191–196
Kimura D (2011) From ear to brain. Brain Cogn 76:214–217
Tervaniemi M, Hugdahl K (2003) Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 43:231–246
Hugdahl K (ed) (1988) Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods, and research. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
Bradshaw JL, Burden V, Nettleton NC (1986) Dichotic and dichhaptic techniques. Neuropsychologia 24:79–90
Bryden MP (1967) An evaluation of some models of laterality. Effects in dichotic listening. Acta Otolaryngol 63:595–604
Bruder GE (1991) Dichotic listening: new developments and applications in clinical research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 620:217–232
Hiscock M, Kinsbourne M (2011) Attention and the right-ear advantage: what is the connection? Brain Cogn 76:263–275
Musiek FE, Weihing J (2011) Perspectives on dichotic listening and the corpus callosum. Brain Cogn 76:225–232
Bouma A, Gootjes L (2011) Effects of attention on dichotic listening in elderly and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain Cogn 76:286–293
Gadea M, Espert R, Salvador A, Martí-Bonmatí L (2011) The sad, the angry, and the asymmetrical brain: dichotic listening studies of negative affect and depression. Brain Cogn 76:294–299
Obrzut JE, Mahoney EB (2011) Use of the dichotic listening technique with learning disabilities. Brain Cogn 76:323–331
Niccum N, Speaks C (1991) Interpretation of outcome on dichotic listening tests following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:614–628
Ocklenburg S, Westerhausen R, Hirnstein M, Hugdahl K (2013) Auditory hallucinations and reduced language lateralization in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of dichotic listening studies. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 19:410–418
Hahn C, Neuhaus AH, Pogun S, Dettling M, Kotz SA, Hahn E, Brüne M, Güntürkün O (2011) Smoking reduces language lateralization: a dichotic listening study with control participants and schizophrenia patients. Brain Cogn 76:300–309
Hahn C, Pogun S, Güntürkün O (2010) Smoking modulates language lateralization in a sex-specific way. Neuropsychologia 48:3993–4002
Demarest L, Demarest J (1981) The interaction of handedness, familial sinistrality and sex on the performance of a dichotic listening task. Int J Neurosci 14:7–13
Ocklenburg S, Arning L, Hahn C, Gerding WM, Epplen JT, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2011) Variation in the NMDA receptor 2B subunit gene GRIN2B is associated with differential language lateralization. Behav Brain Res 225:284–289
Hugdahl K, Løberg EM, Falkenberg LE, Johnsen E, Kompus K, Kroken RA, Nygård M, Westerhausen R, Alptekin K, Ozgören M (2012) Auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia as aberrant lateralized speech perception: evidence from dichotic listening. Schizophr Res 140:59–64
Van der Haegen L, Westerhausen R, Hugdahl K, Brysbaert M (2013) Speech dominance is a better predictor of functional brain asymmetry than handedness: a combined fMRI word generation and behavioral dichotic listening study. Neuropsychologia 51:91–97
Arciuli J (2011) Manipulation of voice onset time during dichotic listening. Brain Cogn 76:233–238
Castro A, Pearson R (2011) Lateralisation of language and emotion in schizotypal personality: evidence from dichotic listening. Pers Individ Dif 51:726–731
Prete G, Marzoli D, Brancucci A, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L (2014) The processing of chimeric and dichotic emotional stimuli by connected and disconnected cerebral hemispheres. Behav Brain Res 271:354–364
Wexler BE, Halwes T (1983) Increasing the power of dichotic methods: the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 21:59–66
Crosson B, Warren RL (1981) Dichotic ear preference for C-V-C words in Wernicke’s and Broca’s aphasias. Cortex 17:249–258
di Stefano M, Salvadori C, Fiaschi E, Viti M (1998) Speech lateralisation in callosal agenesis assessed by the dichotic fused words test. Laterality 3:131–142
Hoch L, Tillmann B (2010) Laterality effects for musical structure processing: a dichotic listening study. Neuropsychology 24:661–666
Nelson MD, Wilson RH, Kornhass S (2003) Performance of musicians and nonmusicians on dichotic chords, dichotic CVs, and dichotic digits. J Am Acad Audiol 14:536–544
Craig JD (1980) A dichotic rhythm task: advantage for the left-handed. Cortex 16:613–620
Spreen O, Spellacy FJ, Reid JR (1970) The effect of interstimulus interval and intensity on ear asymmetry for nonverbal stimuli in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 8:245–250
Ocklenburg S, Ball A, Wolf CC, Genç E, Güntürkün O (2015) Functional cerebral lateralization and interhemispheric interaction in patients with callosal agenesis. Neuropsychology 29:806–815
Løberg EM, Jørgensen HA, Hugdahl K (2004) Dichotic listening in schizophrenic patients: effects of previous vs. ongoing auditory hallucinations. Psychiatry Res 128:167–174
Bozikas VP, Kosmidis MH, Giannakou M, Kechayas P, Tsotsi S, Kiosseoglou G, Fokas K, Garyfallos G (2014) Controlled shifting of attention in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder through a dichotic listening paradigm. Compr Psychiatry 55:1212–1219
Hirnstein M, Hugdahl K, Hausmann M (2014) How brain asymmetry relates to performance—a large-scale dichotic listening study. Front Psychol 4:997
Foundas AL, Corey DM, Hurley MM, Heilman KM (2004) Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing. Cogn Behav Neurol 17:224–232
Conn R, Posey TB (2000) Dichotic listening in college students who report auditory hallucinations. J Abnorm Psychol 109:546–549
Hugdahl K, Andersson L, Asbjørnsen A, Dalen K (1990) Dichotic listening, forced attention, and brain asymmetry in righthanded and lefthanded children. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 12:539–548
Jäncke L, Buchanan TW, Lutz K, Shah NJ (2001) Focused and nonfocused attention in verbal and emotional dichotic listening: an FMRI study. Brain Lang 78:349–363
Kershner JR (2016) Forced-attention dichotic listening with university students with dyslexia: search for a core deficit. J Learn Disabil 49(3):282–292
Obrzut JE, Mondor TA, Uecker A (1993) The influence of attention on the dichotic REA with normal and learning disabled children. Neuropsychologia 31:1411–1416
Russell NL, Voyer D (2004) Reliability of laterality effects in a dichotic listening task with words and syllables. Brain Cogn 54:266–267
Speaks C, Niccum N, Carney E (1982) Statistical properties of responses to dichotic listening with CV nonsense syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 72:1185–1194
Bayazit O, Oniz A, Hahn C, Güntürkün O, Ozgören M (2009) Dichotic listening revisited: trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra- and interhemispheric differences. Neuropsychologia 47:536–545
Eichele T, Nordby H, Rimol LM, Hugdahl K (2005) Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:405–412
Passow S, Westerhausen R, Hugdahl K, Wartenburger I, Heekeren HR, Lindenberger U, Li SC (2014) Electrophysiological correlates of adult age differences in attentional control of auditory processing. Cereb Cortex 24:249–260
Yurgil KA, Golob EJ (2010) Neural activity before and after conscious perception in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia 48:2952–2958
Alho K, Salonen J, Rinne T, Medvedev SV, Hugdahl K, Hämäläinen H (2012) Attention-related modulation of auditory-cortex responses to speech sounds during dichotic listening. Brain Res 1442:47–54
Brancucci A, Penna SD, Babiloni C, Vecchio F, Capotosto P, Rossi D, Franciotti R, Torquati K, Pizzella V, Rossini PM, Romani GL (2008) Neuromagnetic functional coupling during dichotic listening of speech sounds. Hum Brain Mapp 29:253–264
Beaman CP, Bridges AM, Scott SK (2007) From dichotic listening to the irrelevant sound effect: a behavioural and neuroimaging analysis of the processing of unattended speech. Cortex 43:124–134
Hugdahl K, Law I, Kyllingsbaek S, Brønnick K, Gade A, Paulson OB (2000) Effects of attention on dichotic listening: an 15O-PET study. Hum Brain Mapp 10:87–97
Lipschutz B, Kolinsky R, Damhaut P, Wikler D, Goldman S (2002) Attention-dependent changes of activation and connectivity in dichotic listening. Neuroimage 17:643–656
Dos Santos Sequeira S, Specht K, Moosmann M, Westerhausen R, Hugdahl K (2010) The effects of background noise on dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: an fMRI study. Laterality 15:577–596
Van den Noort M, Specht K, Rimol LM, Ersland L, Hugdahl K (2008) A new verbal reports fMRI dichotic listening paradigm for studies of hemispheric asymmetry. Neuroimage 40:902–911
Westerhausen R, Passow S, Kompus K (2013) Reactive cognitive-control processes in free-report consonant-vowel dichotic listening. Brain Cogn 83:288–296
Güntürkün O, Güntürkün M, Hahn C (2015) Whistled Turkish alters language asymmetries. Curr Biol 25:R706–R708
Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, Medvedev S, Laine M, Hämäläinen H (2009) Attention and cognitive control: unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol 50:11–22
Don M, Starr A (1972) Lateralization performance of squirrel monkey (Samiri sciureus) to binaural click signals. J Neurophysiol 35:493–500
Tollin DJ, Populin LC, Moore JM, Ruhland JL, Yin TC (2005) Sound-localization performance in the cat: the effect of restraining the head. J Neurophysiol 93:1223–1234
Welch TE, Dent ML (2011) Lateralization of acoustic signals by dichotically listening budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J Acoust Soc Am 130:2293–2301
Ebert CS Jr, Blanks DA, Patel MR, Coffey CS, Marshall AF, Fitzpatrick DC (2008) Behavioral sensitivity to interaural time differences in the rabbit. Hear Res 235:134–142
Moiseff A (1989) Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl. J Comp Physiol A 164:637–644
Fitch RH, Brown CP, O'Connor K, Tallal P (1993) Functional lateralization for auditory temporal processing in male and female rats. Behav Neurosci 107:844–850
Fitch RH, Brown CP, Tallal P (1993) Left hemisphere specialization for auditory temporal processing in rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci 682:346–347
Böye M, Güntürkün O, Vauclair J (2005) Right ear advantage for conspecific calls in adults and subadults, but not infants, California sea lions (Zalophus californianus): hemispheric specialization for communication? Eur J Neurosci 21:1727–1732
Ehret G (1987) Left hemisphere advantage in the mouse brain for recognizing ultrasonic communication calls. Nature 325:249–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ocklenburg, S. (2017). Tachistoscopic Viewing and Dichotic Listening. In: Rogers, L., Vallortigara, G. (eds) Lateralized Brain Functions. Neuromethods, vol 122. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6725-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6725-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6723-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6725-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols