Abstract
Protein depletion by genetic means, in a very general sense including the use of RNA interference [1, 2] or CRISPR/Cas9-based methods, represents a central paradigm of modern biology to study protein functions in vivo. However, acting upstream the proteic level is a limiting factor if the turnover of the target protein is slow or the existing pool of the target protein is important (for instance, in insect embryos, as a consequence of a strong maternal contribution). In order to circumvent these problems, we developed deGradFP [3, 4]. deGradFP harnesses the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to achieve direct depletion of GFP-tagged proteins. deGradFP is in essence a universal method because it relies on an evolutionarily conserved machinery for protein catabolism in eukaryotic cells; see refs. 5, 6 for review. deGradFP is particularly convenient in Drosophila melanogaster where it is implemented by a genetically encoded effector expressed under the control of the Gal4 system. deGradFP is a ready-to-use solution to perform knockdowns at the protein level if a fly line carrying a functional GFP-tagged version of the gene of interest is available. Many such lines have already been generated by the Drosophila community through different technologies allowing to make genomic rescue constructs or direct GFP knockins: protein-trap stock collections [7, 8] (http://cooley.medicine.yale.edu/flytrap/, http://www.flyprot.org/), P[acman] system [9], MiMIC lines [10, 11], and CRISPR/Cas9-driven homologous recombination.
Two essential controls of a protein knockdown experiment are easily achieved using deGradFP. First, the removal of the target protein can be assessed by monitoring the disappearance of the GFP tag by fluorescence microscopy in parallel to the documentation of the phenotype of the protein knockdown (see Note 1 ). Second, the potential nonspecific effects of deGradFP can be assessed in control fly lacking a GFP-tagged target protein. So far, no nonspecific effects of the deGradFP effector have been reported [3].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dietzl G, Doris CD, Schnorrer F et al (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448:151–156
Ni JQ, Zhou R, Czech B et al (2011) A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila. Nat Methods 8:405–407
Caussinus E, Kanca O, Affolter M (2012) Fluorescent fusion protein knock-out mediated by anti-GFP nanobody. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:117–121
Caussinus E, Kanca O, Affolter M (2013) Protein knockouts in living eukaryotes using deGradFP and green fluorescent protein fusion targets. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 73:Unit 30.2
Ciechanover A (1998) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J 17:7151–7160
Varshavsky A (2012) The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem 81:167–176
Morin X, Daneman R, Zavortink M et al (2001) A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:15050–15055
Lowe N, Rees JS, Roote J et al (2014) Analysis of the expression patterns, subcellular localisations and interaction partners of drosophila proteins using a pigp protein trap library. Development 141:3994–4005
Venken KJT, Carlson JW, Schulze KL et al (2009) Versatile P[acman] bac libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods 6:431–434
Nagarkar-Jaiswal S, Lee PT, Campbell ME et al (2015) A library of Mimics allows tagging of genes and reversible, spatial and temporal knockdown of proteins in Drosophila. Elife. doi:10.7554/eLife.05338
Nagarkar-Jaiswal S, DeLuca SZ, Lee PT et al (2015) A genetic toolkit for tagging intronic mimic containing genes. Elife. doi:10.7554/eLife.08469
Ciechanover A, Ben-Saadon R (2004) N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol 14:103–106
Jiang J, Struhl G (1998) Regulation of the hedgehog and wingless signalling pathways by the F-box/WD40-repeat protein Slimb. Nature 391:493–496
Saerens D, Pellis M, Loris R et al (2005) Identification of a universal VHH framework to graft non-canonical antigen-binding loops of camel single-domain antibodies. J Mol Biol 352:597–607
Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Tillib S et al (2006) Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nat Methods 3:887–889
Tabata T, Eaton S, Kornberg TB (1992) The Drosophila hedgehog gene is expressed specifically in posterior compartment cells and is a target of engrailed regulation. Genes Dev 6:2635–2645
Le T, Liang Z, Patel H et al (2006) A new family of Drosophila balancer chromosomes with a w-Dfd-GMR yellow fluorescent protein marker. Genetics 174:2255–2257
Pina C, Pignoni F (2012) Tubby-RFP balancers for developmental analysis: FM7c 2xTb-RFP, Cyo 2xTb-RFP, and TM3 2xTb-RFP. Genesis 50:119–123
Matsumoto K, Toh-e A, Oshima Y (1978) Genetic control of galactokinase synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for constitutive expression of the positive regulatory gene gal4. J Bacteriol 134:446–457
McGuire SE, Le PT, Osborn AJ et al (2003) Spatiotemporal rescue of memory dysfunction in Drosophila. Science 302:1765–1768
Tilmann B, Dominique F, Stefan L (2014) The transmembrane protein Macroglobulin complement-related is essential for septate junction formation and epithelial barrier function in Drosophila. Development 141:899–908
Royou A, Field C, Sisson JC et al (2004) Reassessing the role and dynamics of nonmuscle myosin II during furrow formation in early Drosophila embryos. Mol Biol Cell 15:838–850
Zecca M, Struhl G (2007) Recruitment of cells into the Drosophila wing primordium by a feed-forward circuit of vestigial autoregulation. Development 134:3001–3010
Bopp D, Bell LR, Cline TW et al (1991) Developmental distribution of female-specific sex-lethal proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev 5:403–415
Urban E, Nagarkar-Jaiswal S, Lehner CF et al (2014) The cohesin subunit Rad21 is required for synaptonemal complex maintenance, but not sister chromatid cohesion, during Drosophila female meiosis. PLOS Genetics 10:e1004540
Rubliaychaudhuri N, Dubruille R, Orsi GA et al (2012) Transgenerational propagation and quantitative maintenance of paternal centromeres depends on Cid/Cenp-A presence in Drosophila sperm. PLoS Biol 10:e1001434
Harder B, Schomburg A, Pflanz R et al (2008) Tev protease-mediated cleavage in Drosophila as a tool to analyze protein functions in living organisms. Biotechniques 44:765–772
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (Indiana University, Bloomington) for providing fly stocks, and Addgene for providing plasmids.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Caussinus, E., Affolter, M. (2016). deGradFP: A System to Knockdown GFP-Tagged Proteins. In: Dahmann, C. (eds) Drosophila. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1478. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6369-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6371-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols