Abstract
Muscle stem cells play a central role in muscle regeneration. Most studies in the field of muscle regeneration focus on the unraveling of muscle stem cell biology to devise strategies for treating failing muscles as seen in aging and muscle-related diseases. However, the common method used in assessing stem cell function in vivo is laborious, as it involves time-consuming immunohistological analyses by microscopy on serial cryo-sections of the muscle post stem cell transplantation. Here we describe an alternative method, which adapts the bioluminescence imaging (BLI) technique to allow noninvasive tracking of engrafted stem-cell function in vivo in real-time. This assay system enables longitudinal studies in the same mice over time and reveals parameters, not feasible by traditional analysis, such as the magnitude and dynamics of engrafted muscle stem cell expansion in vivo in response to a particular drug treatment or muscle injury.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mauro A (1961) Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9:493–495
Sacco A, Doyonnas R, Kraft P, Vitorovic S, Blau HM (2008) Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature 456(7221):502–506. doi:10.1038/nature07384, nature07384 [pii]
Fukada S, Uezumi A, Ikemoto M, Masuda S, Segawa M, Tanimura N, Yamamoto H, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S (2007) Molecular signature of quiescent satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Stem Cells 25(10):2448–2459. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0019
Montarras D, Morgan J, Collins C, Relaix F, Zaffran S, Cumano A, Partridge T, Buckingham M (2005) Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science 309(5743):2064–2067
Dhawan J, Rando TA (2005) Stem cells in postnatal myogenesis: molecular mechanisms of satellite cell quiescence, activation and replenishment. Trends Cell Biol 15(12):666–673
Partridge TA (2002) Cells that participate in regeneration of skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 9(11):752–753. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301764
Blau HM, Cosgrove BD, Ho AT (2015) The central role of muscle stem cells in regenerative failure with aging. Nat Med 21(8):854–862. doi:10.1038/nm.3918
Brack AS, Rando TA (2007) Intrinsic changes and extrinsic influences of myogenic stem cell function during aging. Stem Cell Rev 3(3):226–237
Collins CA, Zammit PS, Ruiz AP, Morgan JE, Partridge TA (2007) A population of myogenic stem cells that survives skeletal muscle aging. Stem Cells 25(4):885–894. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0372
Gopinath SD, Rando TA (2008) Stem cell review series: aging of the skeletal muscle stem cell niche. Aging Cell 7(4):590–598. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00399.x
Grounds MD (1998) Age-associated changes in the response of skeletal muscle cells to exercise and regeneration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 854:78–91
Peault B, Rudnicki M, Torrente Y, Cossu G, Tremblay JP, Partridge T, Gussoni E, Kunkel LM, Huard J (2007) Stem and progenitor cells in skeletal muscle development, maintenance, and therapy. Mol Ther 15(5):867–877. doi:10.1038/mt.sj.6300145
Rosenblatt JD, Lunt AI, Parry DJ, Partridge TA (1995) Culturing satellite cells from living single muscle fiber explants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 31(10):773–779. doi:10.1007/BF02634119
Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Rando TA, Weissman IL, Wagers AJ (2004) Isolation of adult mouse myogenic progenitors: functional heterogeneity of cells within and engrafting skeletal muscle. Cell 119(4):543–554. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.021, S0092867404010360 [pii]
Motohashi N, Asakura Y, Asakura A (2014) Isolation, culture, and transplantation of muscle satellite cells. J Vis Exp (86). doi:10.3791/50846
Cosgrove BD, Gilbert PM, Porpiglia E, Mourkioti F, Lee SP, Corbel SY, Llewellyn ME, Delp SL, Blau HM (2014) Rejuvenation of the muscle stem cell population restores strength to injured aged muscles. Nat Med 20(3):255–264. doi:10.1038/nm.3464
Badr CE (2014) Bioluminescence imaging: basics and practical limitations. Methods Mol Biol 1098:1–18. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-718-1_1
Spring KR (2013) Cameras for digital microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 114:163–178. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407761-4.00008-7
Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE, Sacco A, Leonardi NA, Kraft P, Nguyen NK, Thrun S, Lutolf MP, Blau HM (2010) Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329(5995):1078–1081. doi:10.1126/science.1191035
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ho, A.T.V., Blau, H.M. (2016). Noninvasive Tracking of Quiescent and Activated Muscle Stem Cell (MuSC) Engraftment Dynamics In Vivo. In: Kyba, M. (eds) Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in the Mouse. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1460. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3810-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3808-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3810-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols