Statistical Genomics pp 19-38 | Cite as
Integrative Exploratory Analysis of Two or More Genomic Datasets
- 3 Citations
- 1 Mentions
- 7.4k Downloads
Abstract
Exploratory analysis is an essential step in the analysis of high throughput data. Multivariate approaches such as correspondence analysis (CA), principal component analysis, and multidimensional scaling are widely used in the exploratory analysis of single dataset. Modern biological studies often assay multiple types of biological molecules (e.g., mRNA, protein, phosphoproteins) on a same set of biological samples, thereby creating multiple different types of omics data or multiassay data. Integrative exploratory analysis of these multiple omics data is required to leverage the potential of multiple omics studies. In this chapter, we describe the application of co-inertia analysis (CIA; for analyzing two datasets) and multiple co-inertia analysis (MCIA; for three or more datasets) to address this problem. These methods are powerful yet simple multivariate approaches that represent samples using a lower number of variables, allowing a more easily identification of the correlated structure in and between multiple high dimensional datasets. Graphical representations can be employed to this purpose. In addition, the methods simultaneously project samples and variables (genes, proteins) onto the same lower dimensional space, so the most variant variables from each dataset can be selected and associated with samples, which can be further used to facilitate biological interpretation and pathway analysis. We applied CIA to explore the concordance between mRNA and protein expression in a panel of 60 tumor cell lines from the National Cancer Institute. In the same 60 cell lines, we used MCIA to perform a cross-platform comparison of mRNA gene expression profiles obtained on four different microarray platforms. Last, as an example of integrative analysis of multiassay or multi-omics data we analyzed transcriptomic, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic data from pluripotent (iPS) and embryonic stem (ES) cell lines.
Key words
Multivariate Dimension reduction Multi-omics Multiassay Data integrationReferences
- 1.Fellenberg K, Hauser NC, Brors B, Neutzner A, Hoheisel JD, Vingron M (2001) Correspondence analysis applied to microarray data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10781–10786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Raychaudhuri S, Stuart JM, Altman RB (2000) Principal components analysis to summarize microarray experiments: application to sporulation time series. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp 455–466Google Scholar
- 3.Culhane AC, Perriere G, Higgins DG (2003) Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 21(4):59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Meng C, Kuster B, Culhane A, Gholami AM (2014) A multivariate approach to the integration of multi-omics datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 29(15):162Google Scholar
- 5.Dolédec S, Chessel D (1994) Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshw Biol 31:277–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Culhane AC, Fagan A, Higgins DG (2007) A multivariate analysis approach to the integration of proteomic and gene expression data. Proteomics 7:2162–2171Google Scholar
- 7.Reinhold WC, Sunshine M, Liu H, Varma S, Kohn KW, Morris J, Doroshow J, Pommier Y (2012) Cellminer: a web-based suite of genomic and pharmacologic tools to explore transcript and drug patterns in the NCI-60 cell line set. Cancer Res 72(14):3499–511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Moghaddas Gholami A, Hahne H, Wu Z, Auer FJ, Meng C, Wilhelm M, Kuster B (2013) Global proteome analysis of the NCI-60 cell line panel. Cell Rep 4:609–620Google Scholar
- 9.Phanstiel DH, Brumbaugh J, Wenger CD, Tian S, Probasco MD, Bailey DJ, Swaney DL, Tervo MA, Bolin JM, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Thomson JA, Coon JJ (2011) Proteomic and phosphoproteomic comparison of human ES and iPS cells. Nat Methods 8:821–827CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar