Advertisement

A Luciferase-Based Assay to Test Whether Gene Expression Responses to Environmental Inputs Are Temporally Restricted by the Circadian Clock

  • Amaury de MontaiguEmail author
  • Markus Christian Berns
  • George Coupland
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1398)

Abstract

Gating is the mechanism by which the influence of an environmental signal on a particular output is temporally restricted by the circadian clock, so that the maximum response of the output to the signal occurs at a specific time. Gated regulation mechanisms have been described for several genes whose expression is strongly induced by light or temperature at certain times but repressed by the circadian clock at others. To reveal a gated pattern of expression in response to light, light pulses are applied in the dark at different times of the 24 h cycle and the transcriptional response of the gene of interest is then monitored with an appropriate technique. Luciferase (LUC) reporters have been the method of choice to study circadian rhythms in the past decades, but this methodology also provides an ideal platform for performing a gating assay. In this chapter, we describe a LUC imaging based protocol designed to test whether the influence of light on the expression of a gene of interest is gated by the circadian clock.

Key words

Circadian clock Gating Gene expression Light Luciferase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The laboratory of George Coupland receives a core grant from the Max Planck Society. We are grateful to Reka Tóth and Seth Davis for many discussions on luminescence measurements and experimental design.

References

  1. 1.
    de Montaigu A, Toth R, Coupland G (2010) Plant development goes like clockwork. Trends Genet 26(7):296–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang W, Barnaby JY, Tada Y, Li H, Tor M, Caldelari D, Lee DU, Fu XD, Dong X (2011) Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature 470(7332):110–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9(8):R130PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA (2005) The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science 310(5750):1031–1034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH, Nilsson O (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312(5776):1040–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kloosterman B, Abelenda JA, Gomez Mdel M, Oortwijn M, de Boer JM, Kowitwanich K, Horvath BM, van Eck HJ, Smaczniak C, Prat S, Visser RG, Bachem CW (2013) Naturally occurring allele diversity allows potato cultivation in northern latitudes. Nature 495(7440):246–250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Millar AJ, Short SR, Chua NH, Kay SA (1992) A novel circadian phenotype based on firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 4(9):1075–1087PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li G, Siddiqui H, Teng Y, Lin R, Wan XY, Li J, Lau OS, Ouyang X, Dai M, Wan J, Devlin PF, Deng XW, Wang H (2011) Coordinated transcriptional regulation underlying the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol 13(5):616–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fowler SG, Cook D, Thomashow MF (2005) Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol 137(3):961–968PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edwards KD, Akman OE, Knox K, Lumsden PJ, Thomson AW, Brown PE, Pokhilko A, Kozma-Bognar L, Nagy F, Rand DA, Millar AJ (2010) Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions. Mol Syst Biol 6:424Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vieira J, Pinto da Silva L, Esteves da Silva JC (2012) Advances in the knowledge of light emission by firefly luciferin and oxyluciferin. J Photochem Photobiol B 117:33–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Close D, Xu T, Smartt A, Rogers A, Crossley R, Price S, Ripp S, Sayler G (2012) The evolution of the bacterial luciferase gene cassette (lux) as a real-time bioreporter. Sensors (Basel) 12(1):732–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Millar AJ, Kay SA (1996) Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB gene transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(26):15491–15496PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strayer C, Oyama T, Schultz TF, Raman R, Somers DE, Mas P, Panda S, Kreps JA, Kay SA (2000) Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 289(5480):768–771CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alabadi D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Mas P, Kay SA (2001) Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293(5531):880–883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Covington MF, Panda S, Liu XL, Strayer CA, Wagner DR, Kay SA (2001) ELF3 modulates resetting of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13(6):1305–1315PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16(6):735–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haydon MJ, Mielczarek O, Robertson FC, Hubbard KE, Webb AA (2013) Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock. Nature 502(7473):689–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore A, Zielinski T, Millar AJ (2014) Online period estimation and determination of rhythmicity in circadian data, using the BioDare data infrastructure. Methods Mol Biol 1158:13–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zielinski T, Moore AM, Troup E, Halliday KJ, Millar AJ (2014) Strengths and limitations of period estimation methods for circadian data. PLoS One 9(5):e96462PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amaury de Montaigu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Markus Christian Berns
    • 1
  • George Coupland
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations