Advertisement

Selected Reaction Monitoring to Measure Proteins of Interest in Complex Samples: A Practical Guide

  • Yuehan Feng
  • Paola PicottiEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1394)

Abstract

Biology and especially systems biology projects increasingly require the capability to detect and quantify specific sets of proteins across multiple samples, for example the components of a biological pathway through a set of perturbation-response experiments. Targeted proteomics based on selected reaction monitoring (SRM) has emerged as an ideal tool to this purpose, and complements the discovery capabilities of shotgun proteomics methods. SRM experiments rely on the development of specific, quantitative mass spectrometric assays for each protein of interest and their application to the quantification of the protein set in various biological samples. SRM measurements are multiplexed, namely, multiple proteins can be quantified simultaneously, and are characterized by a high reproducibility and a broad dynamic range. We provide here a practical guide to the development of SRM assays targeting a set of proteins of interest and to their application to complex biological samples.

Key words

Selected reaction monitoring Targeted proteomics Protein quantitation Assay design Assay validation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul J. Boersema and Martin Soste (ETH Zurich) for insightful discussions. We thank Brendan MacLean (University of Washington) for critical reading of the manuscript. P.P. is supported by an EU-FP7 ERC Starting Grant (FP7-ERC-StG-337965), by a FP7-Reintegration grant (FP7-PEOPLE-2010-RG-277147), by a Professorship grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant PP00P3_133670), and by a Promedica Stiftung (grant 2-70669-11). Y.F. is supported by an ETH Research Grant (grant 4412-1).

References

  1. 1.
    Aebersold R, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Picotti P, Aebersold R (2012) Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat Methods 9:555–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soste M, Hrabakova R, Wanka S et al (2014) A sentinel protein assay for simultaneously quantifying cellular processes. Nat Methods 11:1045–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kusebauch U, Deutsch EW, Campbell DS et al (2014) Using PeptideAtlas, SRMAtlas, and PASSEL: comprehensive resources for discovery and targeted proteomics. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 46:13.25.11–13.25.28Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N et al (2010) Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26:966–968CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reiter L, Rinner O, Picotti P et al (2011) mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat Methods 8:430–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bereman MS, MacLean B, Tomazela DM et al (2012) The development of selected reaction monitoring methods for targeted proteomics via empirical refinement. Proteomics 12:1134–1141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS et al (2007) Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 25:125–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fusaro VA, Mani DR, Mesirov JP et al (2009) Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 27:190–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qeli E, Omasits U, Goetze S et al (2014) Improved prediction of peptide detectability for targeted proteomics using a rank-based algorithm and organism-specific data. J Proteomics 108:269–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohammed Y, Domanski D, Jackson AM et al (2014) PeptidePicker: a scientific workflow with web interface for selecting appropriate peptides for targeted proteomics experiments. J Proteomics 106:151–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsch EW, Lam H, Aebersold R (2008) PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO Rep 9:429–434CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whiteaker JR, Halusa GN, Hoofnagle AN et al (2014) CPTAC assay portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays. Nat Methods 11:703–704CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma V, Eckels J, Taylor GK et al (2014) Panorama: a targeted proteomics knowledge base. J Proteome Res 13:4505–4510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Picotti P, Rinner O, Stallmach R et al (2010) High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat Methods 7:43–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stergachis AB, MacLean B, Lee K et al (2011) Rapid empirical discovery of optimal peptides for targeted proteomics. Nat Methods 8:1041–1043CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi M, Chang CY, Clough T et al (2014) MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics 30:2524–2526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Escher C, Reiter L, MacLean B et al (2012) Using iRT, a normalized retention time for more targeted measurement of peptides. Proteomics 12:1111–1121CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Graaf EL, Altelaar AF, van Breukelen B et al (2011) Improving SRM assay development: a global comparison between triple quadrupole, ion trap, and higher energy CID peptide fragmentation spectra. J Proteome Res 10:4334–4341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maclean B, Tomazella DM, Abatiello SE et al (2010) Effect of collision energy optimization on the measurement of peptides by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 82:10116–10124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Institute of BiochemistryETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations