Abstract
Reversible protein phosphorylation plays essential roles in coordinating cell division and many other biological processes. Cell cycle regulation by opposing kinase and protein phosphatase activities is often complex and major challenges exist in identifying the direct substrates of these enzymes and the specific sites at which they act. While cell cycle kinases are known to exhibit strict substrate specificities important for coordinating the complex events of cell division, phosphatases have only recently been recognized to exert similarly precise regulatory control over cell cycle events through timely dephosphorylation of specific substrates. The molecular determinants for substrate recognition by many phosphatases that function in cell division are still poorly delineated. To understand phosphatase specificity, it is critical to employ methods that monitor the dephosphorylation of individual phosphorylation sites on physiologically relevant substrates. Here, using the cell cycle phosphatase Cdc14 as an example, we describe two methods for studying phosphatase specificity, one using synthetic phosphopeptide substrates and the other using intact phosphoprotein substrates. These methods are useful for targeted characterization of small substrate sets and are also adaptable to large-scale applications for global specificity studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brautigan DL (2013) Protein Ser/Thr phosphatases—the ugly ducklings of cell signalling. FEBS J 280:324–345
Bollen M, Gerlich D, Lesage B (2009) Mitotic phosphatases: from entry guards to exit guides. Trends Cell Biol 19:531–541
Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Lamond A (2006) Mitotic phosphatases: no longer silent partners. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:623–631
Virshup DM, Shenolikar S (2009) From promiscuity to precision: protein phosphatases get a makeover. Mol Cell 33:537–545
Wurzenberger C, Gerlich DW (2011) Phosphatases: providing safe passage through mitotic exit. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:469–482
Fisher D, Krasinska L, Coudreuse D et al (2012) Phosphorylation network dynamics in the control of cell cycle transitions. J Cell Sci 125:4703–4711
Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A et al (2010) Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal 3:ra3
Hardie DG (1999) Protein phosphorylation: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, London
Moorhead G (2007) Protein phosphatase protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Zhou B, Zhang Z-Y (2003) Measuring protein phosphatase activity with physiological substrates. Methods Enzymol 366:34–43
Geladopoulos TP, Sotiroudis TG, Evangelopoulos AE (1991) A malachite green colorimetric assay for protein phosphatase activity. Anal Biochem 192:112–116
Sheng Z, Charbonneau H (1993) The baculovirus Autographa californica encodes a protein tyrosine phosphatase. J Biol Chem 268:4728–4733
Taylor GS, Liu Y, Baskerville C et al (1997) The activity of Cdc14p, an oligomeric dual specificity protein phosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 272:24054–24063
Bremmer SC, Hall H, Martinez JS et al (2012) Cdc14 phosphatases preferentially dephosphorylate a subset of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) sites containing phosphoserine. J Biol Chem 287:1662–1669
Clifford DM, Chen CT, Roberts RH et al (2008) The role of Cdc14 phosphatases in the control of cell division. Biochem Soc Trans 36:436–438
Mocciaro A, Schiebel E (2010) Cdc14: a highly conserved family of phosphatases with non-conserved functions? J Cell Sci 123:2867–2876
Stegmeier F, Amon A (2004) Closing mitosis: the functions of the Cdc14 phosphatase and its regulation. Annu Rev Genet 38:203–232
Eissler CL, Mazon G, Powers BL et al (2014) The Cdk/Cdc14 module controls activation of the Yen1 holliday junction resolvase to promote genome stability. Mol Cell 54:80–93
Chin CF, Bennett AM, Ma WK et al (2012) Dependence of Chs2 ER export on dephosphorylation by cytoplasmic Cdc14 ensures that septum formation follows mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 23:45–58
Buss JE, Stull JT (1983) Measurement of chemical phosphate in proteins. Methods Enzymol 99:7–14
Eissler CL, Bremmer SC, Martinez JS et al (2011) A general strategy for studying multisite protein phosphorylation using label-free selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 418:267–275
Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J et al (2006) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc 1:2856–2860
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372
Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A et al (2011) Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res 10:1794–1805
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Powers, B.L., Melesse, M., Eissler, C.L., Charbonneau, H., Hall, M.C. (2016). Measuring Activity and Specificity of Protein Phosphatases. In: Coutts, A., Weston, L. (eds) Cell Cycle Oscillators. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1342. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2957-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2957-3_13
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2956-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2957-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols