High-Efficiency Electroporation of the Spinal Cord in Larval Axolotl

  • Aida Rodrigo Albors
  • Elly M. Tanaka
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1290)


Axolotls are well known for their remarkable ability to regenerate complex body parts and structures throughout life, including the entire limb and tail. Particularly fascinating is their ability to regenerate a fully functional spinal cord after losing the tail. Electroporation of DNA plasmids or morpholinos is a valuable tool to gain mechanistic insight into the cellular and molecular basis of regeneration. It provides among other advantages a simple and fast method to test gene function in a temporally and spatially controlled manner. Some classic drawbacks of the method, such as low transfection efficiency and damage to the tissue, had hindered our understanding of the contribution of different signaling pathways to regeneration. Here, we describe a comprehensive protocol for electroporation of the axolotl spinal cord that overcomes this limitations using a combination of high-voltage and short-length pulses followed by lower-voltage and longer-length pulses. Our approach yields highly efficient transfection of spinal cord cells with minimal tissue damage, which now allows the molecular dissection of spinal cord regeneration.

Key words

Electroporation Spinal cord Regeneration Axolotl 


  1. 1.
    Spallanzani L (1766) Lettre to C. Bonnet dated A’ Bomporto, près de Modene ce 21 Septembre 1766. Edizione Nazionale delle opere di Lazzaro Spallanzani edn.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holtzer SW (1956) The inductive activity of the spinal cord in urodele tail regeneration. J Morphol 99:1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O'Hara CM, Egar MW, Chernoff EA (1992) Reorganization of the ependyma during axolotl spinal cord regeneration: changes in intermediate filament and fibronectin expression. Dev Dyn 193:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nordlander RH, Singer M (1978) The role of ependyma in regeneration of the spinal cord in the urodele amphibian tail. J Comp Neurol 180:349–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McHedlishvili L, Mazurov V, Grassme KS, Goehler K, Robl B, Tazaki A, Roensch K, Duemmler A, Tanaka EM (2012) Reconstitution of the central and peripheral nervous system during salamander tail regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E2258–E2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Echeverri K, Tanaka EM (2003) Electroporation as a tool to study in vivo spinal cord regeneration. Dev Dyn 226:418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khattak S, Sandoval-Guzman T, Stanke N, Protze S, Tanaka EM, Lindemann D (2013) Foamy virus for efficient gene transfer in regeneration studies. BMC Dev Biol 13:17. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-13-17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khattak S, Schuez M, Richter T, Knapp D, Haigo SL, Sandoval-Guzman T, Hradlikova K, Duemmler A, Kerney R, Tanaka EM (2013) Germline transgenic methods for tracking cells and testing gene function during regeneration in the axolotl. Stem Cell Rep 1:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khattak S, Murawala P, Andreas H, Kappert V, Schuez M, Sandoval-Guzman T, Crawford K, Tanaka EM (2014) Optimized axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) husbandry, breeding, metamorphosis, transgenesis and tamoxifen-mediated recombination. Nat Protoc 9:529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mir LM (2014) Electroporation-based gene therapy: recent evolution in the mechanism description and technology developments. Methods Mol Biol 1121:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Echeverri K, Tanaka EM (2002) Ectoderm to mesoderm lineage switching during axolotl tail regeneration. Science 298:1993–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McHedlishvili L, Epperlein HH, Telzerow A, Tanaka EM (2007) A clonal analysis of neural progenitors during axolotl spinal cord regeneration reveals evidence for both spatially restricted and multipotent progenitors. Development 134:2083–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schnapp E, Tanaka EM (2005) Quantitative evaluation of morpholino-mediated protein knockdown of GFP, MSX1, and PAX7 during tail regeneration in Ambystoma mexicanum. Dev Dyn 232:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kawakami K (2007) Tol2: a versatile gene transfer vector in vertebrates. Genome Biol 8(Suppl 1):S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DFG Center for Regenerative Therapies TU Dresden (CRTD)Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations