Advertisement

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization on Comets: FISH Comet

  • Sergey ShaposhnikovEmail author
  • Naouale El Yamani
  • Andrew R. Collins
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1288)

Abstract

The DNA in eukaryotic cells is organized into loop domains that represent basic structural and functional units of chromatin packaging. The comet assay, a sensitive method for monitoring DNA damage and repair, involves electrophoresis of nucleoids comprising supercoiled DNA attached to the nuclear matrix. Breaks in the DNA relax the supercoiling and allow DNA loops to expand, and on electrophoresis to move towards the anode, giving the appearance of a comet tail. We use fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to investigate the structure of the chromatin within comet preparations and to study specific DNA sequences within comets. In this chapter we describe our FISH comets protocols, deal with some technical questions and outline the theory. FISH with comets should be useful to researchers interested in the structural organization of DNA and chromatin, the localization of DNA damage, and the kinetics of repair of damage.

Key words

FISH-comet Comet assay Fluorescent in situ hybridization DNA damage DNA probes 

References

  1. 1.
    Collins AR (2004) The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Mol Biotech 26:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaposhnikov S, Frengen E, Collins A (2009) Increasing the resolution of the comet assay using fluorescent in situ hybridization – a review. Mutagenesis 24:383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pellestor F, Paulasova P, Macek M, Hamamah S (2004) The peptide nucleic acids: a new way for chromosomal investigation on isolated cells? Hum Reprod 19:1946–1951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larsson C, Koch J, Nygren A, Janssen G, Raap AK, Landegren U, Nilsson M (2004) In situ genotyping individual DNA molecules by target-primed rolling-circle amplification of padlock. Nat Methods 1(3):227–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santos SJ, Singh NP, Natarajan AT (1997) Fluorescence in situ hybridization with comets. Exp Cell Res 232:407–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaposhnikov SA, Salenko VB, Brunborg G, Nygren J, Collins AR (2008) Single-cell gel electrophoresis (the comet assay): loops or fragments? Electrophoresis 29:3005–3012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horvathova E, Dusinska M, Shaposhnikov S, Collins AR (2004) DNA damage and repair measured in different genomic regions using the comet assay with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mutagenesis 19:269–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey Shaposhnikov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Naouale El Yamani
    • 2
  • Andrew R. Collins
    • 2
  1. 1.NorGenoTech ASSkreiaNorway
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations