Skip to main content

Scoring Functions for AutoDock

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1273))

Abstract

Automated docking allows rapid screening of protein–ligand interactions. A scoring function composed of a force field and linear weights can be used to compute a binding energy from a docked atom configuration. For different force fields or types of molecules, it may be necessary to train a custom scoring function. This chapter describes the data and methods one must consider in developing a custom scoring function for use with AutoDock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Goodford PJ (1985) A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 28:849–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehler EL, Solmajer T (1991) Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models. Protein Eng 4:903–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stouten PFW, Frömmel C, Nakamura H, Sander C (1993) An effective solvation term based on atomic occupancies for use in protein simulations. Mol Simul 10:97–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–1662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huey R, Morris GM, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS (2007) A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J Comput Chem 28:1145–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris GM, Lim-Wilby M (2008) Molecular docking. In: Kukol A (ed) Molecular modeling of proteins, Methods in molecular biology, vol 443. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–382

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhm HJ (1994) The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:243–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laederach A, Reilly PJ (2003) Specific empirical free energy function for automated docking of carbohydrates to proteins. J Comput Chem 24:1748–1757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill AD, Reilly PJ (2008) A Gibbs free energy correlation for automated docking of carbohydrates. J Comput Chem 29:1131–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerzmann A, Neumann D, Kohlbacher O (2006) SLICK – scoring and energy functions for protein-carbohydrate interactions. J Chem Inf Model 46:1635–1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu L, Benson ML, Smith RD, Lerner MG, Carlson HA (2005) Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases). Proteins 60:333–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 49:6789–6801

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson ML, Smith RD, Khazanov NA, Dimcheff B, Beaver J, Dresslar P, Nerothin J, Carlson HA (2008) Binding MOAD, a high-quality protein-ligand database. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D674–D678

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Pique ME, Lindstrom W, Huey R, Forli S, Hart WE, Halliday S, Belew R, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock 4.2 User guide. http://autodock.scripps.edu/faqs-help/manual. Accessed 20 Dec 2011

  16. O’Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR (2011) Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform 3:33

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su S, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA (1993) General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 14:1347–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon MS, Schmidt MW (2005) Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In: Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE (eds) Theory and applications of computational chemistry: the first forty years. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1167–1189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Reilly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Hill, A.D., Reilly, P.J. (2015). Scoring Functions for AutoDock. In: Lütteke, T., Frank, M. (eds) Glycoinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1273. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2343-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2343-4_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2343-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics