Combining Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization with Neuronal Tracing and Immunohistochemistry

  • Jeremy S. Duncan
  • Karen L. Elliott
  • Jennifer Kersigo
  • Brian Gray
  • Bernd Fritzsch
Protocol
Part of the Neuromethods book series (NM, volume 99)

Abstract

Despite the presence of several markers to study the expression of genes (eGFP, LacZ), in situ hybridization remains one of the most powerful techniques to analyze gene expression. While this allows cellular identification of the expression of a single gene and, using fluorescent in situ hybridization two or occasionally more genes, it is often necessary to combine this technology with assays of neuronal projection/morphology, protein expression using antibody staining, and histology for cytological details. Since each task has certain levels of false negatives, combining them in a single preparation can compromise further correlative studies due to loss of fluorescence, loss of antigenic epitope, or loss of tissue morphology. We have designed a protocol that, when performed in sequence, will enable the researcher to combine several of these technologies in the same sample saving time and sparing expense. By combining neuronal tracing, whole-mount in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and histology one can extract a maximal amount of data with limited loss in fidelity of each technique and optimal data superposition for a more complete understanding of phenotypes.

Key words

In situ hybridization Lipophilic dye Immunohistochemistry Neuronal tracing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Confocal images were obtained at the University of Iowa Carver Center for Imaging. We thank the Office of the Vice President for Research (OVPR), University of Iowa College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (CLAS), and the P30 core grant for support (DC 010362). This work was in part supported by a NASA base grant (Bernd Fritzsch) and 1R43GM108470-01 (Gray, Fritzsch).

References

  1. 1.
    Tautz D, Pfeifle C (1989) A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98(2):81–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koopman P (2001) In situ hybridization to mRNA: from black art to guiding light. Int J Dev Biol 45(3):619–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallner GN, Amann R, Beisker W (1993) Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14(2):136–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouchard M et al (2010) Pax2 and Pax8 cooperate in mouse inner ear morphogenesis and innervation. BMC Dev Biol 10:89CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan JS, Fritzsch B (2013) Continued expression of GATA3 is necessary for cochlear neurosensory development. PLoS One 8(4):e62046CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pan N et al (2012) A novel Atoh1 “self-terminating” mouse model reveals the necessity of proper Atoh1 level and duration for hair cell differentiation and viability. PLoS One 7(1):e30358CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fritzsch B, Glover J (2006) Evolution of the deuterostome central nervous system: an intercalation of developmental patterning processes with cellular specification processes. Evol Nerv Syst 2:1–24Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duncan J et al (2011) Combining lipophilic dye, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and histology. J Vis Exp 49:2451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadjieconomou D et al (2011) Flybow: genetic multicolor cell labeling for neural circuit analysis in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods 8(3):260–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hama H et al (2011) Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 14(11):1481–1488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung K et al (2013) Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497(7449):332–337CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shcherbakova DM, Verkhusha VV (2013) Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nat Methods 10:751–754CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prigodich AE et al (2012) Multiplexed nanoflares: mRNA detection in live cells. Anal Chem 84(4):2062–2066CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai D et al (2013) Improved tools for the Brainbow toolbox. Nat Methods 10(6):540–547CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abe T, Fujimori T (2013) Reporter mouse lines for fluorescence imaging. Dev Growth Differ 55:390–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fritzsch B (1993) Fast axonal diffusion of 3000 molecular weight dextran amines. J Neurosci Methods 50(1):95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tonniges J et al (2010) Photo- and bio-physical characterization of novel violet and near-infrared lipophilic fluorophores for neuronal tracing. J Microsc 239(2):117–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kopecky BJ et al (2012) Three-dimensional reconstructions from optical sections of thick mouse inner ears using confocal microscopy. J Microsc 248(3):292–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jahan I et al (2010) Neurod1 suppresses hair cell differentiation in ear ganglia and regulates hair cell subtype development in the cochlea. PLoS One 5(7):e11661CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy S. Duncan
    • 1
  • Karen L. Elliott
    • 2
  • Jennifer Kersigo
    • 2
  • Brian Gray
    • 3
  • Bernd Fritzsch
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Otolaryngology and Department of Neurobiology and AnatomyUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.The Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and SciencesUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Molecular Targeting Technologies Inc.West ChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations