Abstract
Faced with an increasing demand to select one embryo to transfer back to patients, a number of techniques are being developed to assist in discriminating differences within the cohort of a patient’s embryos. A new and emerging technology which allows us to measure the profile of different metabolites in embryo culture media and formulate a viability score correlated to implantation potential is metabolomics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Steptoe PC, Edwards RG (1978) Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo [letter]. Lancet 2(8085):366
Trounson A, Mohr L (1983) Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 305(5936):707–709
Lutjen P, Trounson A, Leeton J, Findlay J, Wood C, Renou P (1984) The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature 307(5947):174–175
Society for Assisted Reproduction Technology (SART) 2009 data. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
De MJ, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V et al (2010) Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 25(8):1851–1862
Adashi EY, Barri PN, Berkowitz R, Braude P, Bryan E, Carr J et al (2003) Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic. Reprod Biomed Online 7(5):515–542
Ledger WL, Anumba D, Marlow N, Thomas CM, Wilson EC (2006) The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. BJOG 113(1):21–25
Cummins J, Breen T, Harrison K, Shaw J, Wilson L, Hennessey J (1986) A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 3:284–295
Edwards R, Fishel S, Cohen J (1984) Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1:3–23
De Neubourg D, Gerris J (2003) Single embryo transfer—state of the art. Reprod Biomed Online 7(6):615–622
Sakkas D, Gardner DK (2004) Evaluation of embryo quality. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles C, Shoham Z (eds) Assisted reproduction technology laboratory and clinical perspectives, 2nd edn. Martin Dunitz Press, London, pp 211–234
Sakkas D, Gardner DK (2005) Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17(3):283–288
Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB (2004) Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 81(3):551–555
Inge GB, Brinsden PR, Elder KT (2005) Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful? Hum Reprod 20(3):588–592
Patrizio P, Sakkas D (2009) From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 91(4):1061–1066
Renard JP, Philippon A, Menezo Y (1980) In-vitro uptake of glucose by bovine blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil 58(1):161–164
Gardner DK, Leese HJ (1987) Assessment of embryo viability prior to transfer by the noninvasive measurement of glucose uptake. J Exp Zool 242(1):103–105
Lane M, Gardner DK (1996) Selection of viable mouse blastocysts prior to transfer using a metabolic criterion. Hum Reprod 11(9):1975–1978
Botros L, Sakkas D, Seli E (2008) Metabolomics and its application for non-invasive embryo assessment in IVF. Mol Hum Reprod 14(12):679–690
Oliver SG, Winson MK, Kell DB, Baganz F (1998) Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol 16(9):373–378
Ellis DI, Goodacre R (2006) Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 131(8):875–885
Seli E, Sakkas D, Scott R, Kwok SH, Rosendahl S, Burns DH (2007) Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using Raman and near infrared spectroscopy correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 88(5):1350–1357
Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK (2006) Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 86(3):678–685
Katz-Jaffe MG, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB (2006) Proteomic analysis of individual human embryos to identify novel biomarkers of development and viability. Fertil Steril 85(1):101–107
Scott R, Seli E, Miller K, Sakkas D, Scott K, Burns DH (2008) Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using Raman spectroscopy predicts embryonic reproductive potential: a prospective blinded pilot study. Fertil Steril 90(1):77–83
Seli E, Vergouw CG, Morita H, Botros L, Roos P, Lambalk CB et al (2010) Noninvasive metabolomic profiling as an adjunct to morphology for noninvasive embryo assessment in women undergoing single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 94(2):535–542
Ahlstrom A, Wikland M, Rogberg L, Barnett JS, Tucker M, Hardarson T (2011) Cross-validation and predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms for day-5 blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 22(5):477–484
Vergouw CG, Botros LL, Roos P, Lens JW, Schats R, Hompes PG et al (2008) Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection. Hum Reprod 23(7):1499–1504
Seli E, Bruce C, Botros L, Henson M, Roos P, Judge K et al (2011) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of day 5 morphology grading and metabolomic Viability Score on predicting implantation outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(2):137–144
Hardarson T, Ahlstrom A, Rogberg L, Botros L, Hillensjo T, Westlander G et al (2012) Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture media: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 27:89–96
Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Proctor M (2007) Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD002118
Vergouw CG. Metabolomic profiling of culture media by NIR spectroscopy as an adjunct to morphology for selection of a single Day 3 embryo to transfer: a double blind randomised trial (unpublished data)
Sfontouris IA, Lainas GT, Sakkas D, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas TG (2013) Non-invasive metabolomic analysis using a commercial NIR instrument for embryo selection. J Hum Reprod Sci 6(2):133–139
Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR et al (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357(1):9–17
Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E (2008) Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod 14(12):703–710
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sakkas, D. (2014). Embryo Selection Using Metabolomics. In: Rosenwaks, Z., Wassarman, P. (eds) Human Fertility. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1154. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0658-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0659-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols