Synthetic RNA Switches for Yeast Metabolic Engineering: Screening Recombinant Enzyme Libraries

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1152)

Abstract

Directed evolution is a powerful technique for increasing the activity of poorly active enzymes, for example when an enzyme is engineered to accept a new substrate or function in a new environment. Since enzyme activity greatly depends on the enzyme environment, screening should be performed under the same conditions as the ultimate application of the enzyme. When an enzyme will be used in live cells, RNA biosensors offer a powerful and flexible method of linking the desired phenotype, production of a small molecule of interest, to an easily measured phenotype, such as fluorescence. Here, we describe methods for screening enzyme libraries using an RNA biosensor, showing examples from the evolution of a P450 monooxygenase.

Key words

RNA switch Directed evolution P450 High-throughput enzyme screening 

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold FH, Georgiou G (2003) Directed enzyme evolution: screening and selection methods, vol 230. In: Arnold FH, Georgiou G (eds) Methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michener JK, Thodey K, Liang JC, Smolke CD (2012) Applications of genetically-encoded biosensors for the construction and control of biosynthetic pathways. Metab Eng 14(3):212–222. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2011.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michener JK, Smolke CD (2012) High-throughput enzyme evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a synthetic RNA switch. Metab Eng 14(4):306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Win MN, Smolke CD (2007) A modular and extensible RNA-based gene-regulatory platform for engineering cellular function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(36):14283–14288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinha J, Topp S, Gallivan JP (2011) From SELEX to cell: dual selections for synthetic riboswitches. In: Voigt C (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 497. Academic Press, New York, pp 207–220. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385075-1.00009-3 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang JC, Smolke CD (2012) Rational design and tuning of ribozyme-based devices. Methods Mol Biol 848:439–454. doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-545-9_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liang JC, Chang AL, Kennedy AB, Smolke CD (2012) A high-throughput, quantitative cell-based screen for efficient tailoring of RNA device activity. Nucleic Acids Res 40(20):e154. doi:10.1093/nar/gks636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chao G, Lau WL, Hackel BJ, Sazinsky SL, Lippow SM, Wittrup KD (2006) Isolating and engineering human antibodies using yeast surface display. Nat Protoc 1(2):755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desai SK, Gallivan JP (2004) Genetic screens and selections for small molecules based on a synthetic riboswitch that activates protein translation. J Am Chem Soc 126(41):13247–13254. doi:10.1021/ja048634j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill A, Bloom K (1987) Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol Cell Biol 7(7):2397–2405Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organismic and Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioengineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations