Skip to main content

Tetravalent DNA Vaccine Product as a Vaccine Candidate Against Dengue

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
DNA Vaccines

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1143))

Abstract

Dengue is the most important arbovirus worldwide and is the virus that causes dengue fever and the more severe dengue hemorrhagic fever. There are four serotypes of dengue with each possessing the ability to cause disease. Developing a preventive vaccine is the most efficient and effective way to prevent these diseases, and because immunity to one serotype does not protect against the other serotypes, a vaccine must provide tetravalent protection. We used DNA immunization as a platform to develop a tetravalent vaccine. In this chapter, we describe the laboratory, regulatory, and clinical methodology for evaluating a candidate tetravalent vaccine in a Phase 1 clinical trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Raviprakash K et al (2009) Advances in dengue vaccine development. Hum Vaccin 5:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raviprakash K et al (2006) A chimeric tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine elicits neutralizing antibody to all four virus serotypes in rhesus macaques. Virology 353:166–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff JA et al (1992) Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gene expression in mouse muscle. Hum Mol Genet 1:363–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ulmer JB et al (1993) Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science 259:1745–1749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beckett CG et al (2011) Evaluation of a prototype dengue-1 DNA vaccine in a Phase 1 clinical trial. Vaccine 29:960–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. (2007) Guidance for industry: toxicity grading scale for healthy adults and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Vaccines/ucm091977.pdf.

  7. Putnak JR et al (2008) Comparative evaluation of three assays for measurement of dengue virus neutralizing antibodies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 79:115–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raviprakash K et al (2000) Dengue virus type 1 DNA vaccine induces protective immune responses in rhesus macaques. J Gen Virol 81:1659–1667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu Y et al (2003) Dengue 2 PreM-E/LAMP chimera targeted to the MHC class II compartment elicits long-lasting neutralizing antibodies. Vaccine 21:2178–2189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blair PJ et al (2006) Evaluation of immunity and protective efficacy of a dengue-3 pre-membrane and envelope DNA vaccine in Aotus nancymaae monkeys. Vaccine 24:1427–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. (1995) Guidance for industry: content and format of investigational new drug applications (INDs) for phase 1 studies of drugs, including well-characterized, therapeutic, biotechnology-derived products. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM074980.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Peifang Sun, Ms. Monika Simmons, and Mr. Dan Ewing for their input on the laboratory test procedures. The views expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the US Government. We are employees of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. article 105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. article 101 defines a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. For the clinical trial described in this chapter, the NMRC Institutional Review Board, along with the US Army Human Subjects Research Review Board, reviewed and approved the study protocol in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin R. Porter M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Porter, K.R., Teneza-Mora, N., Raviprakash, K. (2014). Tetravalent DNA Vaccine Product as a Vaccine Candidate Against Dengue. In: Rinaldi, M., Fioretti, D., Iurescia, S. (eds) DNA Vaccines. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1143. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0410-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0410-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0409-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0410-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics