Skip to main content

Participatory Methods in Ethnobiological and Ethnoecological Research

Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

This chapter introduces a brief discussion of the paths of participatory methods, within a multidisciplinary perspective, exemplifying its use as an instrument for data collection in ethnobiological research, as well as a discussion of some advantages and disadvantages.

Key words

  • Participatory approach
  • Ethnobiology
  • Ethnoecology
  • Ethnobotany

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_3
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-8636-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Geilfus F (1997) 80 Herramientas para el desarrollo participativo: diagnóstico, planificación, monitoreo, evaluación, 1st edn. IICA, San Salvador, p 218

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santos AD (2005) Participatory methodologies: ways to strengthen spaces public environmental, 1st edn. Peirópolis, São Paulo, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunther M, Vogl CR (2010) Visual participatory methods: an overview. Working group: knowledge systems and innovations division of organic farming department for sustainable agricultural systems, 1st edn. BOKU—University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chambers R, Guijt I (1995) DRP, cinco años después ¿Dónde nos encontramos? For Trees People Newsl 26(27):4–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park P (1992) Qué es la investigación-acción participativa. Perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas. In: Salazar MC (ed) La investigación-acción participativa: inícios y desarrollos. Editorial Popular, Madrid, pp 135–174

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colette MM (2001) Moderação. In: Brose M (Org) Participatory methodology: A introduction to 29 instruments. Tomo Editorial, Porto Alegre, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lulekal E, Kelbessa E, Bekele T et al (2008) An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Mana Angetu district, southeastern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4:10

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodward E, Jackson S, Finn M et al (2012) Utilising Indigenous seasonal knowledge to understand aquatic resource use and inform water resource management in northern Australia. Ecol Manag Restor 13(1):58–64

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Von Der Weid JM (2001) The trajectory approaches participatory development practice of NGOs in Brazil. In: Brose M (Org) Metodologia participativa: uma introdução a 29 instrumentos. Tomo Editorial, Porto Alegre, pp 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conway GR, McCracken JA (1990) Rapid rural appraisal and agroecosystem analysis. In: Altieri MA, Hecht SB (eds) Agroecology and small farm development. CRC Press, Inc., Florida, pp 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petersen P, Romano JO (1999) Participatory approaches local development. AS-PTA-Brasil, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans K, Jong WD, Cronkleton P et al (2006) Guide to participatory tools for forest communities. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Boef WS, Thijssen MH (2007) Participatory tools in working with crops, varieties and seeds. A guide for professionals working with participatory approaches in agrobiodiversity management, crop improvement and development of the seed sector. Wageningen International, Wageningen, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  15. Verdejo ME (2006) Participatory rural appraisal: practical guide. MDA/Secretaria da Agricultura Familiar, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaskell G (2007) Individual and group interviews. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G (eds) search qualitative text, image and sound: A practical Handbook, 6th edn. Vozes, Rio de Janeiro, pp 64–89

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sheil D, Puri RK, Basuki I et al (2004) Explorando la biodiversidad, el medio ambiente y las perspectives de los pobladores en areas boscosas: métodos para la valoración multidisciplinaria del paisage, 2nd edn. CIFOR, Bogor, pp 1–65

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sieber SS, Medeiros PM, Albuquerque UP (2011) Local perception of environmental change in a semi-arid area of northeast Brazil: a new approach for the use of participatory methods at the level of family units. J Agric Environ Ethics 24:511–531

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Boissiere M, Basuki I, Koponen P et al (2006) Biodiversity and local perceptions on the edge of a conservation area, Khe Tranvillage, Vietnam. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, p 106

    Google Scholar 

  20. Silva TC, Ramos MA, Alvarez IA, Kiill LHP, Albuquerque UP (2011) Representations owners and employes on farms changes and conservation of riparian vegetation the banks of the Rio São Francisco (Northeast Brazil)-Environmental Representations populations the banks of the São Francisco River 11:279–285

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piroznia M, Nagaranja V, Deng Y (2007) Gene Venn—a web application for comparing gene list use Venn diagrams. Bioinformation 1(10):420–422

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira EN, Mourão JS, Rocha PD et al (2009) Folk classification of the crabs and swimming crabs (Crustacea—Brachyura) of the Mamanguape river estuary, northeastern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 22(5):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaudhary P, Wangdi S, Mao A et al (2011) Consistency of local perceptions of climate change in the Kangchenjunga Himalaya landscape. Curr Sci 101(4):504–513

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mikkelsen B (2000) Methods for development work and research. A guide for practitioners, 6th edn. Sage, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  25. Catley A, Osman J, Mawien C et al (2002) Participatory analysis of seasonal incidences of diseases of cattle, disease vectors and rainfall in southern Sudan. Prev Vet Med 53:275–284

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clarke PA (2007) Aboriginal people and their plants. Rosenberg Publishing, Kenthurst

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aswani S, Vaccaro I (2008) Lagoon ecology and social strategies: habitat diversity and ethnobiology. Hum Ecol 36:325–341

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Moreira RF, Funi C, Silva CR (2011) Use Participatory Assessment Methodologies in the Dynamic Fishing in the Central Basin Araguari River, Amapá. Paper presented at the X Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil, São Lourenço, 16–22 Sept 2011

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rana RB, Sthapit BR, Garforth C et al (2004) Four-cells analysis as a decision-making tool for conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm. In: Sthapit BR, Upadhyay MP, Shrestha PK, Jarvis DI (eds) On-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in Nepal. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Nagarkot, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Castro AP, Fraxe TJP, Pereira HS et al (2012) Ethnobotany of local varieties of yams (Dioscorea spp.) grown in communities in the municipality of Caapiranga, state Amazon. Acta Bot Brasilica 26(3):658–667

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gomes LJ, Santana VB (2004) Organization community participatory management of order a conservation: the case of Serra-Itabaiana. Ijuí Editora Unijuí 4(6):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  32. Medeiros, Patrícia Muniz, Almeida, Alyson Luiz Santos, Silva, Taline Cristina, Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino (2011) Pressure indicators of wood resource use in an Atlantic forest area, Northeastern Brazil. Environmental Management (New York), 47:410–424

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Sieber, S.S., da Silva, T.C., Campos, L.Z.d.O., Zank, S., Albuquerque, U.P. (2014). Participatory Methods in Ethnobiological and Ethnoecological Research. In: Albuquerque, U., Cruz da Cunha, L., de Lucena, R., Alves, R. (eds) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8635-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8636-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols