Skip to main content

Co-immunoprecipitation for Assessing Protein–Protein Interactions in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Expression System in Nicotiana benthamiana

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Protein-Protein Interactions

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2690))

  • 1592 Accesses

Abstract

The characterization of protein–protein interactions (PPI) often provides functional information about a target protein. Yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) and luminescence/fluorescence-based detections, therefore, have been widely utilized for assessing PPI. In addition, a co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) method has also been adopted with transient protein expression in Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana) infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Herein, we describe a co-IP procedure in which structural maintenance of chromosome 1 (SMC1), identified from a Y2H screening, was verified as an interacting partner for microchidia 1 (MORC1), a protein well known for its function in plant immunity and epigenetics. SMC1 and MORC1 were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana when infiltrated by Agrobacterium with the respective genes. From this approach, we identified a region of SMC1 responsible for interacting with MORC1. The co-IP method, of which outputs are mainly from immunoblot analysis, provided information about target protein expression as well, which is often useful for troubleshooting. Using this feature, we showcased a PPI confirmation from our SMC1–MORC1 study in which a full-length SMC1 protein was not detectable, and, therefore, a subsequent truncated mutant analysis had to be employed for PPI verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Struk S, Jacobs A, Sánchez Martín-Fontecha E et al (2019) Exploring the protein–protein interaction landscape in plants. Plant Cell Environ 42:387–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Syafrizayanti BC, Hoheisel JD et al (2014) Methods for analyzing and quantifying protein–protein interaction. Expert Rev Proteomics 11:107–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carvunis AR, Charloteaux B, Dreze M et al (2011) Evidence for network evolution in an arabidopsis interactome map. Science 333

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braun P, Aubourg S, Van Leene J et al (2013) Plant protein interactomes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:161–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukhtar MS, Carvunis AR, Dreze M et al (2011) Independently evolved virulence effectors converge onto hubs in a plant immune system network. Science 333:596–601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Morsy M, Gouthu S, Orchard S et al (2008) Charting plant interactomes: possibilities and challenges. Trends Plant Sci 13:183–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Citovsky V, Lee LY, Vyas S et al (2006) Subcellular localization of interacting proteins by bimolecular fluorescence complementation in planta. J Mol Biol 362:1120–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerppola TK (2006) Visualization of molecular interactions by fluorescence complementation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:449–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gookin TE, Assmann SM (2014) Significant reduction of Bi FC non-specific assembly facilitates in planta assessment of heterotrimeric G-protein interactors. The Plant J 80:553–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang HG, Oh C-S, Sato M et al (2010) Endosome-associated CRT1 functions early in resistance gene–mediated defense signaling in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 22:918–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang HG, Kuhl JC, Kachroo P et al (2008) CRT1, an Arabidopsis ATPase that interacts with diverse resistance proteins and modulates disease resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Cell Host Microbe 3:48–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jia N, Zhu Y, Xie F (2018) An efficient protocol for model legume root protoplast isolation and transformation. Front Plant 9:670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin HY, Chen JC, Fang SC (2018) A protoplast transient expression system to enable molecular, cellular, and functional studies in Phalaenopsis orchids. Front Plant 9:843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon TH, Seo JE, Kim J et al (2003) Expression and secretion of the heterodimeric protein interleukin-12 in plant cell suspension culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:870–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Norkunas K, Harding R, Dale J et al (2018) Improving agroinfiltration-based transient gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods 14:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyurin AA, Suhorukova AV, Kabardaeva KV et al (2020) Transient gene expression is an effective experimental tool for the research into the fine mechanisms of plant gene function: advantages, limitations, and solutions. Plan Theory 9:1187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang YC, Yu M, Shih PY et al (2018) Stable pH suppresses defense signaling and is the key to enhance agrobacterium-mediated transient expression in Arabidopsis seedlings. Sci Rep 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moffett P, Farnham G, Peart J et al (2002) Interaction between domains of a plant NBS–LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death. The EMBO J 21:4511–4519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Collier SM, Moffett P (2009) NB-LRRs work a “bait and switch” on pathogens. Trends Plant Sci 14:521–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zuo J, Niu QW, Chua NH (2000) An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. The Plant J 24:265–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aoyama T, Chua NH (1997) A glucocorticoid-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants. The Plant J 11:605–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang HG, Woo Choi H, Von Einem S et al (2012) CRT1 is a nuclear-translocated MORC endonuclease that participates in multiple levels of plant immunity. Nat Commun 3:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lorković ZJ, Naumann U, Matzke AJM et al (2012) Involvement of a GHKL ATPase in RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 22:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolaños-Villegas P (2021) The role of structural maintenance of chromosomes complexes in meiosis and genome maintenance: translating biomedical and model plant research into crop breeding opportunities. Front Plant 563

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uhlmann F (2016) SMC complexes: from DNA to chromosomes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:399–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeppsson K, Kanno T, Shirahige K et al (2014) The maintenance of chromosome structure: positioning and functioning of SMC complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:601–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P et al (1998) SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. PNAS 95:5857–5864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirano M, Hirano T (2002) Hinge-mediated dimerization of SMC protein is essential for its dynamic interaction with DNA. The EMBO J 21:5733–5744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis TE (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Angela H. Kang for critical comments on the manuscript. This work is supported by National Science Foundation Grant (IOS-1553613) to HGK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Gu Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Nam, J.C., Bhatt, P.S., Kim, SI., Kang, HG. (2023). Co-immunoprecipitation for Assessing Protein–Protein Interactions in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Expression System in Nicotiana benthamiana. In: Mukhtar, S. (eds) Protein-Protein Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2690. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3327-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3327-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3326-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3327-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics