Abstract
The extent of transposable element (TE) mobilization in different somatic tissues and throughout diverse species is not well understood. Somatic transposition is often challenging to study as it generates de novo TE insertions that represent rare genetic variants present in heterogenous tissues. Here, we describe experimental approaches that can be applied to address TE mobility in somatic tissues with the use of short- and long-read whole-genome DNA sequencing. Focusing on the analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster intestinal and head tissues, we provide instructions on how to design, perform, and validate experiments that aim at detecting somatic transposition. In addition to providing examples of protocols, this chapter intends to deliver general experimental guidelines that may be adapted to other fly tissues or to other species.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kubo S, del Seleme MC, Soifer HS et al (2006) L1 retrotransposition in nondividing and primary human somatic cells. PNAS 103:8036–8041. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601954103
Muotri AR, Chu VT, Marchetto MCN et al (2005) Somatic mosaicism in neuronal precursor cells mediated by L1 retrotransposition. Nature 435:903–910. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03663
Coufal NG, Garcia-Perez JL, Peng GE et al (2009) L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells. Nature 460:1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08248
Xie W, Donohue RC, Birchler JA (2013) Quantitatively increased somatic transposition of transposable elements in Drosophila strains compromised for RNAi. PLoS One 8:e72163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072163
Li W, Prazak L, Chatterjee N et al (2013) Activation of transposable elements during aging and neuronal decline in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 16:529–531. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3368
Chang Y-H, Keegan RM, Prazak L, Dubnau J (2019) Cellular labeling of endogenous retrovirus replication (CLEVR) reveals de novo insertions of the gypsy retrotransposable element in cell culture and in both neurons and glial cells of aging fruit flies. PLoS Biol 17:e3000278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000278
Treiber CD, Waddell S (2020) Transposon expression in the Drosophila brain is driven by neighboring genes and diversifies the neural transcriptome. Genome Res 30:1559. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.259200.119
Treiber CD, Waddell S (2017) Resolving the prevalence of somatic transposition in Drosophila. eLife 6:e28297. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28297
Yang N, Srivastav SP, Rahman R et al (2022) Transposable element landscapes in aging Drosophila. PLoS Genet 18:e1010024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010024
Siudeja K, Nassari S, Gervais L et al (2015) Frequent somatic mutation in adult intestinal stem cells drives neoplasia and genetic mosaicism during aging. Cell Stem Cell 17:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.016
Riddiford N, Siudeja K, van den Beek M et al (2021) Evolution and genomic signatures of spontaneous somatic mutation in Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Genome Res 31(8):1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.268441.120
Siudeja K, van den Beek M, Riddiford N et al (2021) Unraveling the features of somatic transposition in the Drosophila intestine. The EMBO J:e106388. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020106388
Rahman R, Chirn G, Kanodia A et al (2015) Unique transposon landscapes are pervasive across Drosophila melanogaster genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 43:10655–10672. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1193
Tauc HM, Tasdogan A, Pandur P (2014) Isolating intestinal stem cells from adult Drosophila midguts by FACS to study stem cell behavior during aging. J Vis Exp:e52223. https://doi.org/10.3791/52223
Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118:401–415
Feng Q, Moran JV, Kazazian HH, Boeke JD (1996) Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition. Cell 87:905–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81997-2
Ewing AD, Smits N, Sanchez-Luque FJ et al (2020) Nanopore sequencing enables comprehensive transposable element epigenomic profiling. Mol Cell 80:915–928.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.024
Li H (2018) Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094–3100. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
Stocker H, Gallant P (2008) Getting started. In: Dahmann C (ed) Drosophila: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 27–44
Partridge L, Green A, Fowler K (1987) Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 33:745–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(87)90060-6
Partridge L, Prowse N (1997) The effects of reproduction on longevity and fertility in male Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 43:501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00014-0
Reiff T, Jacobson J, Cognigni P et al (2015) Endocrine remodelling of the adult intestine sustains reproduction in Drosophila. eLife 4:e06930. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06930
Ahmed SMH, Maldera JA, Krunic D et al (2020) Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila. Nature 584:415–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2462-y
O’Neill K, Brocks D, Hammell MG (2020) Mobile genomics: tools and techniques for tackling transposons. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 375:20190345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0345
Mohamed M, Dang NT-M, Ogyama Y et al (2020) A transposon story: from TE content to TE dynamic invasion of Drosophila genomes using the single-molecule sequencing technology from Oxford nanopore. Cell 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081776
Han S, Dias GB, Basting PJ et al (2022) Local assembly of long reads enables phylogenomics of transposable elements in a polyploid cell line. bioRxiv:2022.01.04.471818
Wang L, Zeng X, Ryoo HD, Jasper H (2014) Integration of UPRER and oxidative stress signaling in the control of intestinal stem cell proliferation. PLoS Genet 10:e1004568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004568
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Allison Bardin for her support and guidance in developing the presented protocols and for the comments on the manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge Sonia Lameiras for optimizing low DNA input Illumina WGS sequencing. This work was supported by Inserm (K.S.) and ANR SoMuSeq-STEM (ANR-16-CE13-0012) to Allison J. Bardin and Nicolas Servant (salaries of NR and MvdB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
van den Beek, M., Rubanova, N., Siudeja, K. (2023). Experimental Approaches to Study Somatic Transposition in Drosophila Using Whole-Genome DNA Sequencing. In: Branco, M.R., de Mendoza Soler, A. (eds) Transposable Elements. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2607. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2883-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2883-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2882-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2883-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols