Abstract
Control of operant behavior in mice represents a powerful technique for evaluating behavioral function, biobehavioral differences, and the impact of environmental and pharmacological stimuli. The present method provides a means for rapid behavioral assessments that contrasts with the many weeks or months required in most steady-state procedures. The use of mice in these tests has many advantages including the ability to evaluate transgenic animals. Effects of compounds on suppressed or punished responding are often used to predict anxiolytic efficacy in humans. In contrast to steady-state baselines that can take months to establish, the present method can deliver dose–response data within a few days. Mice are food deprived and placed in an experimental chamber with two nose poke holes. Every nose poke (FR1) produces a 20 mg food pellet. After 2 days of training, a drug or drug vehicle is administered, and the mice are exposed to a mixed FR1 (food), FR1 (food + shock) schedule in alternating, unsignaled periods of 4 and 10 min for three cycles. In the 10-min period, nose pokes produce both food plus brief electrification of the grid floor (0.5 mA for 100 ms); during the 4-min period, only food is delivered with each nose poke. Under these conditions, the introduction of shock can substantially decrease nose pokes during the 10-min punishment period without significantly affecting responding during the non-punishment periods. Results are shown that document the comparability of the drug effects in this procedure to that of other punishment procedures requiring protracted training. Importantly, the method has wide applicability in probing multiple aspects of murine behavior and behavioral differences such as acquisition and extinction of behavior, sensory differences, and memory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc, New York
Geller I, Seifter J (1960) The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1:482–492
Cook L, Davidson AB (1973) Effects of behaviorally- active drugs in a conflict-punishment procedure in rats. In: Garratini S, Mussini E, Randall LO (eds) The Benzodiazepines. Raven Press, New York, pp 327–345
Spealman RD, Katz JL (1980) Some effects of clozapine on punished responding by mice and squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212:435–440
Umezu T (1999) Effects of psychoactive drugs in the Vogel conflict test in mice. Jpn J Pharmacol 80:111–118
Vogel JR, Beer B, Clody DE (1971) A simple and reliable conflict procedure for testing antianxiety agents. Psychopharmacologia 21:1–7
Millan MJ, Brocco M (2003) The Vogel conflict test: procedural aspects, g-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and monoamines. Eur J Pharmacol 463:67–96
Umezu T (1995) Assessment of anxiolytics (5) – Vogel-type conflict task in mice. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi 15:305–314
Barrett JE, Witkin JM (1991) Buspirone in animal models of anxiety. In: Tunnicliff G, Eison AS, Taylor DP (eds) Buspirone: mechanisms and clinical aspects. Academic Press, New York, pp 37–79
Patel JB, Malick JB (1980) Effects of isoproterenol and chlordiazepoxide on drinking and conflict behaviors in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:819–821
Witkin JM, Morrow D, Li X (2004) A rapid experimental conflict procedure for detection of anxiolytic compounds in mice. Psychopharmacology 172:52–57
Eiler WJA 2nd, Gleason SD, Smith JL, Witkin JM (2019) A medium throughput rodent model of relapse from addiction with behavioral and pharmacological specificity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 183:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2019.06.005
Kim JH, Perry C, Luikinga S, Zbukvic I, Brown RM, Lawrence AJ (2015) Extinction of a cocaine-taking context that protects against drug-primed reinstatement is dependent on the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor. Addict Biol 20(3):482–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12142
Harro J (2019) Animal models of depression: pros and cons. Cell Tissue Res 377(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2973-0
Kelleher RT, Morse WH (1968) Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol 60:1–56
Witkin JM, Katz JL (1990) Analysis of behavioral effects of drugs. Drug Dev Res 20:389–409
Gleason SD, Witkin JM (2007) A parametric analysis of punishment frequency as a determinant of the response to chlordiazepoxide in the Vogel conflict test in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 87(3):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2007.05.011
Pisu C, Pira L, Pani L (2010) Quetiapine anxiolytic-like effect in the Vogel conflict test is serotonin dependent. Behav Pharmacol 21:649–653
Barbano MF, Castañé A, Martín-García E, Maldonado R (2009) Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances food reinforcement in a mouse operant conflict test. Psychopharmacology 205:475–487
Borsini F, Podhorna J, Marazziti D (2002) Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology 163:121–141
Witkin JM, Smith JL (2022) Marble-burying in mice. In: Harro J (ed) Psychiatric vulnerability, and mood and anxiety disorders – tests and models in mice and rats. Humana Springer Nature
Witkin JM (2011) A Vogel conflict test using food reinforcement in mice. In: Gould T (ed) Mood and anxiety related phenotypes in mice, vol 2: characterization using behavioral tests. Humana Press
Eiler WJ 2nd, Chen Y, Slieker LJ, Ardayfio PA, Statnick MA, Witkin JM (2017) Consequences of constitutive deletion of melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptors for feeding and foraging behaviors of mice. Behav Brain Res 316:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.028
Balcer OM, Seager MA, Gleason SD, Li X et al (2019) Evaluation of 5-HT7 receptor antagonism for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia through the use of receptor-deficient mice. Behav Brain Res 360:270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Witkin, J.M., Smith, J.L. (2023). A Vogel Conflict Test Using Food Reinforcement in Mice. In: Harro, J. (eds) Psychiatric Vulnerability, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders. Neuromethods, vol 190. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2748-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2748-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2747-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2748-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols