Skip to main content

A Vogel Conflict Test Using Food Reinforcement in Mice

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Psychiatric Vulnerability, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 190))

  • 823 Accesses

Abstract

Control of operant behavior in mice represents a powerful technique for evaluating behavioral function, biobehavioral differences, and the impact of environmental and pharmacological stimuli. The present method provides a means for rapid behavioral assessments that contrasts with the many weeks or months required in most steady-state procedures. The use of mice in these tests has many advantages including the ability to evaluate transgenic animals. Effects of compounds on suppressed or punished responding are often used to predict anxiolytic efficacy in humans. In contrast to steady-state baselines that can take months to establish, the present method can deliver dose–response data within a few days. Mice are food deprived and placed in an experimental chamber with two nose poke holes. Every nose poke (FR1) produces a 20 mg food pellet. After 2 days of training, a drug or drug vehicle is administered, and the mice are exposed to a mixed FR1 (food), FR1 (food + shock) schedule in alternating, unsignaled periods of 4 and 10 min for three cycles. In the 10-min period, nose pokes produce both food plus brief electrification of the grid floor (0.5 mA for 100 ms); during the 4-min period, only food is delivered with each nose poke. Under these conditions, the introduction of shock can substantially decrease nose pokes during the 10-min punishment period without significantly affecting responding during the non-punishment periods. Results are shown that document the comparability of the drug effects in this procedure to that of other punishment procedures requiring protracted training. Importantly, the method has wide applicability in probing multiple aspects of murine behavior and behavioral differences such as acquisition and extinction of behavior, sensory differences, and memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geller I, Seifter J (1960) The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1:482–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook L, Davidson AB (1973) Effects of behaviorally- active drugs in a conflict-punishment procedure in rats. In: Garratini S, Mussini E, Randall LO (eds) The Benzodiazepines. Raven Press, New York, pp 327–345

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spealman RD, Katz JL (1980) Some effects of clozapine on punished responding by mice and squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212:435–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Umezu T (1999) Effects of psychoactive drugs in the Vogel conflict test in mice. Jpn J Pharmacol 80:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel JR, Beer B, Clody DE (1971) A simple and reliable conflict procedure for testing antianxiety agents. Psychopharmacologia 21:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Millan MJ, Brocco M (2003) The Vogel conflict test: procedural aspects, g-aminobutyric acid, glutamate and monoamines. Eur J Pharmacol 463:67–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Umezu T (1995) Assessment of anxiolytics (5) – Vogel-type conflict task in mice. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi 15:305–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrett JE, Witkin JM (1991) Buspirone in animal models of anxiety. In: Tunnicliff G, Eison AS, Taylor DP (eds) Buspirone: mechanisms and clinical aspects. Academic Press, New York, pp 37–79

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel JB, Malick JB (1980) Effects of isoproterenol and chlordiazepoxide on drinking and conflict behaviors in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:819–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Witkin JM, Morrow D, Li X (2004) A rapid experimental conflict procedure for detection of anxiolytic compounds in mice. Psychopharmacology 172:52–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eiler WJA 2nd, Gleason SD, Smith JL, Witkin JM (2019) A medium throughput rodent model of relapse from addiction with behavioral and pharmacological specificity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 183:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2019.06.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH, Perry C, Luikinga S, Zbukvic I, Brown RM, Lawrence AJ (2015) Extinction of a cocaine-taking context that protects against drug-primed reinstatement is dependent on the metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor. Addict Biol 20(3):482–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harro J (2019) Animal models of depression: pros and cons. Cell Tissue Res 377(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2973-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelleher RT, Morse WH (1968) Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol 60:1–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Witkin JM, Katz JL (1990) Analysis of behavioral effects of drugs. Drug Dev Res 20:389–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gleason SD, Witkin JM (2007) A parametric analysis of punishment frequency as a determinant of the response to chlordiazepoxide in the Vogel conflict test in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 87(3):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2007.05.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisu C, Pira L, Pani L (2010) Quetiapine anxiolytic-like effect in the Vogel conflict test is serotonin dependent. Behav Pharmacol 21:649–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbano MF, Castañé A, Martín-García E, Maldonado R (2009) Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances food reinforcement in a mouse operant conflict test. Psychopharmacology 205:475–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Borsini F, Podhorna J, Marazziti D (2002) Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology 163:121–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Witkin JM, Smith JL (2022) Marble-burying in mice. In: Harro J (ed) Psychiatric vulnerability, and mood and anxiety disorders – tests and models in mice and rats. Humana Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  22. Witkin JM (2011) A Vogel conflict test using food reinforcement in mice. In: Gould T (ed) Mood and anxiety related phenotypes in mice, vol 2: characterization using behavioral tests. Humana Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eiler WJ 2nd, Chen Y, Slieker LJ, Ardayfio PA, Statnick MA, Witkin JM (2017) Consequences of constitutive deletion of melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptors for feeding and foraging behaviors of mice. Behav Brain Res 316:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balcer OM, Seager MA, Gleason SD, Li X et al (2019) Evaluation of 5-HT7 receptor antagonism for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia through the use of receptor-deficient mice. Behav Brain Res 360:270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Witkin, J.M., Smith, J.L. (2023). A Vogel Conflict Test Using Food Reinforcement in Mice. In: Harro, J. (eds) Psychiatric Vulnerability, Mood, and Anxiety Disorders. Neuromethods, vol 190. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2748-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2748-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2747-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2748-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics