Abstract
Cell dissociation is an important technique for the study of tissue phenotypes. The method chosen to harvest cells from solid tissues profoundly influences the types of cells recovered. Methodology also shapes any biases that are introduced that can act upon cell surface protein phenotypes or gene expression. Here we describe examples of cell surface phenotypic changes and typical yields, under 4 different isolation conditions (enzymatic/non-enzymatic), using the axolotl spleen, and the regenerating limb. We describe simple methods for evaluating the liberation of viable cells and the downstream characterization of cell diversity using a live-cell flow cytometry approach. Of note, the cellular composition of dissociated cells and surface antigen detection vary with each condition. TrypLE and “no enzyme” protocols give the highest surface marker expression, but poor liberation of non-immune cells in the blastema. Liberase-DH and Liberase-TL have alternative neutral proteases and both give acceptable dissociation of diverse cell types in the blastema. Liberase-TL provides the highest yield of all cell sizes and a larger non-immune fraction. Matching dissociation times between limb blastemas and spleens, we demonstrate the effect of “over-digestion” in soft tissues. In the spleen, the Liberase enzyme cocktails produced the lowest yields, worst viability, and the greatest loss of immune cell surface markers, when compared with non-enzymatic and TrypLE dissociation. These examples provide a template for optimizing protocols for individual tissues while achieving the balance between cell recovery and the mitigation of cellular changes appropriate for downstream applications such as single-cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry.
Key words
- Cell dissociation
- Single cells
- Phenotyping
- RNAseq
- Regeneration
- Salamander
- Axolotl
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Takeichi M (1990) Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. Annu Rev Biochem 59:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.001321
Kumar A, Godwin JW (2010) Preparation and culture of limb blastema stem cells from regenerating larval and adult salamanders. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010(1):pdb.prot5367-pdb.prot5367. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5367
Aronowitz JA, Lockhart RA, Hakakian CS (2015) Mechanical versus enzymatic isolation of stromal vascular fraction cells from adipose tissue. Springerplus 4:713. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1509-2
Schneeberger EE, Lynch RD (1992) Structure, function, and regulation of cellular tight junctions. Am J Phys 262(6 Pt 1):L647–L661. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1992.262.6.L647
Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM (2010) The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 123(Pt 24):4195–4200. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.023820
Halper J, Kjaer M (2014) Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: elastin, fibrillin, fibulins, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, tenascins and thrombospondins. Adv Exp Med Biol 802:31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7893-1_3
Loganathan G, Balamurugan AN, Venugopal S (2020) Human pancreatic tissue dissociation enzymes for islet isolation: advances and clinical perspectives. Diabetes Metab Syndr 14(2):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.010
Rawlings ND, Salvesen G (2013) Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. 3rd ed, Elsevier/AP, Amsterdam
Autengruber A, Gereke M, Hansen G, Hennig C, Bruder D (2012) Impact of enzymatic tissue disintegration on the level of surface molecule expression and immune cell function. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2(2):112–120. https://doi.org/10.1556/EuJMI.2.2012.2.3
Stremnitzer C, Manzano-Szalai K, Willensdorfer A, Starkl P, Pieper M, Konig P, Mildner M, Tschachler E, Reichart U, Jensen-Jarolim E (2015) Papain degrades tight junction proteins of human keratinocytes in vitro and sensitizes C57BL/6 mice via the skin independent of its enzymatic activity or TLR4 activation. J Invest Dermatol 135(7):1790–1800. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.58
Price PA (1975) The essential role of Ca2+ in the activity of bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease. J Biol Chem 250(6):1981–1986
Dolmans MM, Michaux N, Camboni A, Martinez-Madrid B, Van Langendonckt A, Nottola SA, Donnez J (2006) Evaluation of Liberase, a purified enzyme blend, for the isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod 21(2):413–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei320
Tsuji K, Ojima M, Otabe K, Horie M, Koga H, Sekiya I, Muneta T (2017) Effects of different cell-detaching methods on the viability and cell surface antigen expression of synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant 26(6):1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368917X694831
Dono K, Gotoh M, Monden M, Kanai T, Fukuzaki T, Mori T (1994) Low temperature collagenase digestion for islet isolation from 48-hour cold-preserved rat pancreas. Transplantation 57(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199401000-00005
Hidvegi NC, Sales KM, Izadi D, Ong J, Kellam P, Eastwood D, Butler PE (2006) A low temperature method of isolating normal human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartil 14(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.08.007
Mascotti K, McCullough J, Burger SR (2000) HPC viability measurement: trypan blue versus acridine orange and propidium iodide. Transfusion 40(6):693–696. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40060693.x
Debuque RJ, Godwin JW (2015) Methods for axolotl blood collection, intravenous injection, and efficient leukocyte isolation from peripheral blood and the regenerating limb. Methods Mol Biol 1290(Chapter 17):205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2495-0_17
Sobkow L, Epperlein HH, Herklotz S, Straube WL, Tanaka EM (2006) A germline GFP transgenic axolotl and its use to track cell fate: dual origin of the fin mesenchyme during development and the fate of blood cells during regeneration. Dev Biol 290(2):386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.037
Kerfourn F, Guillet F, Charlemagne J, Tournefier A (1992) T-cell-specific membrane antigens in the Mexican axolotl (urodele amphibian). Dev Immunol 2(3):237–248
Acknowledgments
“Research reported in this publication was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant numbers P20GM103423 and P20GM104318.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Johnson, G., Dastagir, N., Beal, Z., Hart, A., Godwin, J. (2023). Cell Dissociation Techniques in Salamanders. In: Seifert, A.W., Currie, J.D. (eds) Salamanders. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2562. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2659-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2659-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2658-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2659-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols